Abstract
New methods are required for identifying membranes in subcellular fractions with respect to their origin, if such preparations are to be evaluated morphometrically. One method is freeze-fracturing which reveals intramembrane particles whose size, pattern, and numerical density differ for various membrane types. The question is examined whether the differences in numerical particle density per square micrometer of membrane (alpha) can be used to differentiate membrane vesicles found in microsomal fractions from liver cells with respect to their origin in the hepatocytes. It is found that the range of alpha for the protoplasmic face (PF) of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane (1,900 less than alpha less than 3,250) is intermediate between those for plasma and mitochondrial membranes. Since PF(ER) should appear in the outer leaflet of microsomal vesicles, alpha was estimated on concave profiles of freeze-fracture preparations; the numerical frequency distribution of vesicles with respect to alpha was trimodal, with a major peak around 2,900/micrometer2 and 66% of the vesicles in the range determined for PF(ER). Using a new stereological method, it was calculated that 63% of the membrane surface in these microsomal fractions was of ER origin by this criterion. On the same preparations, an attempt was made to label the ER-derived membranes cytochemically for glucose-6-phosphatase. A line intersection count revealed 62% of the membrane surface to be of ER origin on the basis of marker enzyme labeling. These findings indicate a smaller part of ER membranes in microsomal fractions than would be predicted from biochemical data (77%). The possible reasons for such discrepancies are discussed; shifts in particle densities due to the preparation procedure could lead to an underestimate by freeze-fracturing, whereas the prediction from biochemical data could be overestimates if marker enzymes were not homogeneously distributed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.2 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- APPELMANS F., WATTIAUX R., DE DUVE C. Tissue fractionation studies. 5. The association of acid phosphatase with a special class of cytoplasmic granules in rat liver. Biochem J. 1955 Mar;59(3):438–445. doi: 10.1042/bj0590438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baudhuin P., Beaufay H., Rahman-Li Y., Sellinger O. Z., Wattiaux R., Jacques P., De Duve C. Tissue fractionation studies. 17. Intracellular distribution of monoamine oxidase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, D-amino acid oxidase and catalase in rat-liver tissue. Biochem J. 1964 Jul;92(1):179–184. doi: 10.1042/bj0920179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baudhuin P., Evrard P., Berthet J. Electron microscopic examination of subcellular fractions. I. The preparation of representative samples from suspensions of particles. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jan;32(1):181–191. doi: 10.1083/jcb.32.1.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beaufay H., Amar-Costesec A., Thinès-Sempoux D., Wibo M., Robbi M., Berthet J. Analytical study of microsomes and isolated subcellular membranes from rat liver. 3. Subfractionation of the microsomal fraction by isopycnic and differential centrifugation in density gradients. J Cell Biol. 1974 Apr;61(1):213–231. doi: 10.1083/jcb.61.1.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blouin A., Bolender R. P., Weibel E. R. Distribution of organelles and membranes between hepatocytes and nonhepatocytes in the rat liver parenchyma. A stereological study. J Cell Biol. 1977 Feb;72(2):441–455. doi: 10.1083/jcb.72.2.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolender R. P., Paumgartner D., Losa G., Muellener D., Weibel E. R. Intergrated stereological and biochemical studies of hepatocytic membranes. I. Membrane recoveries in subcellular fractions. J Cell Biol. 1978 May;77(2):565–583. doi: 10.1083/jcb.77.2.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Branton D., Bullivant S., Gilula N. B., Karnovsky M. J., Moor H., Mühlethaler K., Northcote D. H., Packer L., Satir B., Satir P. Freeze-etching nomenclature. Science. 1975 Oct 3;190(4209):54–56. doi: 10.1126/science.1166299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Branton D. Freeze-etching studies of membrane structure. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1971 May 27;261(837):133–138. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1971.0043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chalcroft J. P., Bullivant S. An interpretation of liver cell membrane and junction structure based on observation of freeze-fracture replicas of both sides of the fracture. J Cell Biol. 1970 Oct;47(1):49–60. doi: 10.1083/jcb.47.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duppel W., Dahl G. Effect of phase transition on the distribution of membrane-associated particles in microsomes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Mar 19;426(3):408–417. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90386-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duppel W., Ullrich V. Membrane effects on drug monooxygenation activity in hepatic microsomes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Mar 19;426(3):399–407. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90385-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EMMELOT P., BOS C. J., BENEDETTI E. L., RUEMKE P. STUDIES ON PLASMA MEMBRANES. I. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND ENZYME CONTENT OF PLASMA MEMBRANES ISOLATED FROM RAT LIVER. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Jul 15;90:126–145. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(64)90125-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodenough D. A., Revel J. P. A fine structural analysis of intercellular junctions in the mouse liver. J Cell Biol. 1970 May;45(2):272–290. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.2.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hackenbrock C. R. States of activity and structure in mitochondrial membranes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1972 Jun 20;195:492–505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melnick R. L., Packer L. Freeze-fracture faces of inner and outer membranes of mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1971 Dec 7;253(2):503–508. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(71)90057-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moor H. Freeze-etching. Int Rev Cytol. 1969;25:391–412. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60209-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mühlethaler K. Studies on freeze-etching of cell membranes. Int Rev Cytol. 1971;31:1–19. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60055-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Orci L., Matter A., Rouiller C. A comparative study of freeze-etch replicas and thin sections of rat liver. J Ultrastruct Res. 1971 Apr;35(1):1–19. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(71)80140-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Packer L. Functional organization of intramembrane particles of mitochondrial inner membranes. J Bioenerg. 1972 May;3(1):115–127. doi: 10.1007/BF01516002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reddy J. K., Tewari J. P., Svoboda D. J., Malhotra S. K. Identification of the hepatic microbody membrane in freeze-fracture replicas. Lab Invest. 1974 Sep;31(3):268–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weibel E. R., Losa G., Bolender R. P. Stereological method for estimating relative membrane surface area in freeze-fracture preparations of subcellular fractions. J Microsc. 1976 Aug;107(3):255–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1976.tb02447.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weibel E. R., Paumgartner D. Integrated stereological and biochemical studies on hepatocytic membranes. II. Correction of section thickness effect on volume and surface density estimates. J Cell Biol. 1978 May;77(2):584–597. doi: 10.1083/jcb.77.2.584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]