Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1978 Oct 1;79(1):97–109. doi: 10.1083/jcb.79.1.97

Fractionation of nucleosomes by salt elution from micrococcal nuclease- digested nuclei

PMCID: PMC2110209  PMID: 701381

Abstract

The solubilization of nucleosomes and histone H1 with increasing concentrations of NaCl has been investigated in rat liver nuclei that had been digested with micrococcal nuclease under conditions that did not substantially alter morphological properties with respect to differences in the extent of chromatin condensation. The pattern of nucleosome and H1 solubilization was gradual and noncoordinate and at least three different types of nucleosome packing interactions could be distinguished from the pattern. A class of nucleosomes containing 13-- 17% of the DNA and comprising the chromatin structures most available for micrococcal nuclease attack was eluted by 0.2 M NaCl. This fraction was solubilized with an acid-soluble protein of apparent molecular weight of 20,000 daltons and no histone H1. It differed from the nucleosomes released at higher NaCl concentrations in content of nonhistone chromosomal proteins. 40--60% of the nucleosomes were released by 0.3 M NaCl with 30% of the total nuclear histone H1 bound. The remaining nucleosomes and H1 were solublized by 0.4 M or 0.6 M NaCl. H1 was not nucleosome bound at these ionic strengths, and these fractions contained, respectively, 1.5 and 1.8 times more H1 per nucleosome than the population released by 0.3 M NaCl. These fractions contained the DNA least available for micrococcal nuclease attach. The strikingly different macromolecular composition, availability for nuclease digestion, and strength of the packing interactions of the nucleosomes released by 0.2 M NaCl suggest that this population is involved in a special function.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alfageme C. R., Zweidler A., Mahowald A., Cohen L. H. Histones of Drosophila embryos. Electrophoretic isolation and structural studies. J Biol Chem. 1974 Jun 25;249(12):3729–3736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Axel R., Cedar H., Felsenfield G. The structure of the globin genes in chromatin. Biochemistry. 1975 Jun 3;14(11):2489–2495. doi: 10.1021/bi00682a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradbury E. M., Carpenter B. G., Rattle H. W. Magnetic resonance studies of deoxyribonucleoprotein. Nature. 1973 Jan 12;241(5385):123–126. doi: 10.1038/241123a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Finch J. T., Klug A. Solenoidal model for superstructure in chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jun;73(6):1897–1901. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.1897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Levy W B., Wong N. C., Dixon G. H. Selective association of the trout-specific H6 protein with chromatin regions susceptible to DNase I and DNase II: possible location of HMG-T in the spacer region between core nucleosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jul;74(7):2810–2814. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.7.2810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Levy B., Dixon G. H. Renaturation kinetics of cDNA complementary to cytoplamic polyadenylated RNA from rainbow trout testis. Accessibility of transcribed genes to pancreatic DNase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977 Apr;4(4):883–898. doi: 10.1093/nar/4.4.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mazia D. THE PARTICULATE ORGANIZATION OF THE CHROMOSOME. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1954 Jun;40(6):521–527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.40.6.521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Noll M. Internal structure of the chromatin subunit. Nucleic Acids Res. 1974 Nov;1(11):1573–1578. doi: 10.1093/nar/1.11.1573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Olins A. L., Olins D. E. Spheroid chromatin units (v bodies). Science. 1974 Jan 25;183(4122):330–332. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4122.330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Olins D. E., Olins A. L. Physical studies of isolated eucaryotic nuclei. J Cell Biol. 1972 Jun;53(3):715–736. doi: 10.1083/jcb.53.3.715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Renz M., Day L. A. Transition from noncooperative to cooperative and selective binding of histone H1 to DNA. Biochemistry. 1976 Jul 27;15(15):3220–3228. doi: 10.1021/bi00660a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sanders M. M., Hsu J. T. Fractionation of purified nucleosomes on the basis of aggregation properties. Biochemistry. 1977 Apr 19;16(8):1690–1695. doi: 10.1021/bi00627a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Van Holde K. E., Sahasrabuddhe C. G., Shaw B. R. A model for particulate structure in chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 1974 Nov;1(11):1579–1586. doi: 10.1093/nar/1.11.1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES