Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1979 Feb 1;80(2):465–480. doi: 10.1083/jcb.80.2.465

The role of actin in temperature-dependent gel-sol transformation of extracts of Ehrlich ascites tumor cells

PMCID: PMC2110333  PMID: 457753

Abstract

Ehrlich ascites tumor cell extracts form a gel when warmed to 25 degrees C at pH 7.0 in sucrose solution, and the gel rapidly becomes a sol when cooled to 0 degrees C. This gel-sol transformation was studied quantitatively by determining the volume or the total protein of pellets of gel obtained by low-speed centrifugation. The gelation depended on nucleotide triphosphates, Mg2+, KCl, and a reducing agent. Gelation was inhibited reversibly by 0.5 microM free Ca2+, and 25--50 ng/ml of either cytochalasin B or D, but it was not affected by 10 mM colchicine. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis demonstrated that the gel was composed of six major proteins with mol wt greater than 300,000, 270,000, 89,000, 51,000, 48,000, and 42,000 daltons. The last component was identified as cell actin because it had the same molecular weight as muscle actin and bound with muscle myosin and tropomyosin. The role of actin in gelation was studied by use of actin-inhibitors. Gelation was inhibited by a chemically modified subfragment-1 of myosin, which binds with F-actin even in the presence of ATP, and by bovine pancreatic DNase I, which tightly binds with G- actin. Muscle G-actin neutralized the inhibitory effect of DNase I when added at an equimolar ratio to the latter, and it also restored gelation after its inhibition by DNase I. These findings suggest that gelation depends on actin. However, the extracts showed temperature- dependent, cytochalasin-sensitive, and Ca2+-regulated gelation as did the original extracts when the cell actin in the extracts was replaced by muscle actin, suggesting that components other than cell actin might be responsible for these characteristics of the gelation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hitchcock S. E. Regulation of motility in nonmuscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jul;74(1):1–15. doi: 10.1083/jcb.74.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Inoue A., Tonomura Y. Separation of subfragment-1 of H-meromyosin into two equimolar fractions with and without formation of the reactive enzyme-phosphate-ADP complex. J Biochem. 1976 Feb;79(2):419–434. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a131085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ishiura M., Shibata-Sekiya K., Kato T., Tonomura Y. A chemically modified subfragment-1 of myosin from skeletal muscle as a novel tool for identifying the function of actomyosin in non-muscle cells. J Biochem. 1977 Jul;82(1):105–115. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a131658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Taylor D. L., Rhodes J. A., Hammond S. A. The contractile basis of ameboid movement. II. Structure and contractility of motile extracts and plasmalemma-ectoplasm ghosts. J Cell Biol. 1976 Jul;70(1):123–143. doi: 10.1083/jcb.70.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES