Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1979 Mar 1;80(3):674–691. doi: 10.1083/jcb.80.3.674

Role of spindle microtubules in the control of cell cycle timing

PMCID: PMC2110356  PMID: 572367

Abstract

Sea urchin eggs are used to investigate the involvement of spindle microtubules in the mechanisms that control the timing of cell cycle events. Eggs are treated for 4 min with Colcemid at prophase of the first mitosis. No microtubules are assembled for at least 3 h, and the eggs do not divide. These eggs show repeated cycles of nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB) and nuclear envelope reformation (NER). Mitosis (NEB to NER) is twice as long in Colcemid-treated eggs as in the untreated controls. Interphase (NER to NEB) is the same in both. Thus, each cycle is prolonged entirely in mitosis. The chromosomes of treated eggs condense and eventually split into separate chromatids which do not move apart. This "canaphase" splitting is substantially delayed relative to anaphase onset in the control eggs. Treated eggs are irradiated after NEB with 366-nm light to inactivate the Colcemid. This allows the eggs to assemble normal spindles and divide. Up to 14 min after NEB, delays in the start of microtubule assembly give equal delays in anaphase onset, cleavage, and the events of the following cell cycle. Regardless of the delay, anaphase follows irradiation by the normal prometaphase duration. The quantity of spindle microtubules also influences the timing of mitotic events. Short Colcemid treatments administered in prophase of second division cause eggs to assemble small spindles. One blastomere is irradiated after NEB to provide a control cell with a normal-sized spindle. Cells with diminished spindles always initiate anaphase later than their controls. Telophase events are correspondingly delayed. This work demonstrates that spindle microtubules are involved in the mechanisms that control the time when the cell will initiate anaphase, finish mitosis, and start the next cell cycle.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aronson J. F. Demonstration of a colcemid-sensitive attractive force acting between the nucleus and a center. J Cell Biol. 1971 Nov;51(21):579–583. doi: 10.1083/jcb.51.2.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BAJER A. Cine-micrographic studies on chromosome movements in beta-irradiated cell. Chromosoma. 1958;9(4):319–331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borisy G. G., Olmsted J. B., Marcum J. M., Allen C. Microtubule assembly in vitro. Fed Proc. 1974 Feb;33(2):167–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brinkley B. R., Stubblefield E., Hsu T. C. The effects of colcemid inhibition and reversal on the fine structure of the mitotic apparatus of Chinese hamster cells in vitro. J Ultrastruct Res. 1967 Jul;19(1):1–18. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(67)80057-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CARLSON J. G. On the mitotic movements of chromosomes. Science. 1956 Aug 3;124(3214):203–206. doi: 10.1126/science.124.3214.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carlson J. G. Mitotic Behavior of Induced Chromosomal Fragments Lacking Spindle Attachments in the Neuroblasts of the Grasshopper. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1938 Nov;24(11):500–507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.24.11.500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deysson G. Autimitotic substances. Int Rev Cytol. 1968;24:99–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garland D., Teller D. C. A reexamination of the reaction between colchicine and tubulin. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;253:232–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb19202.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HELL E., COX D. G. Effects of colchicine and colchemid on synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid in the skin of the guinea pig's ear in vitro. Nature. 1963 Jan 19;197:287–288. doi: 10.1038/197287a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Holm G., Bajer A. Cine micrographic studies on mitotic spiralization cycle. Hereditas. 1966;54(3):356–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1966.tb02027.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Inoué S., Sato H. Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):259–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Masters M., Pardee A. B. Sequence of enzyme synthesis and gene replication during the cell cycle of Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Jul;54(1):64–70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.1.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mazia D., Harris P. J., Bibring T. The Multiplicity of the Mitotic Centers and the Time-Course of Their Duplication and Separation. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Feb 1;7(1):1–20. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McGill M., Brinkley B. R. Human chromosomes and centrioles as nucleating sites for the in vitro assembly of microtubules from bovine brain tubulin. J Cell Biol. 1975 Oct;67(1):189–199. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.1.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mizel S. B., Wilson L. Nucleoside transport in mammalian cells. Inhibition by colchicine. Biochemistry. 1972 Jul 4;11(14):2573–2578. doi: 10.1021/bi00764a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Raff R. A., Kaumeyer J. F. Soluble microtubule proteins of the sea urchin embryo: partial characterization of the proteins and behavior of the pool in early development. Dev Biol. 1973 Jun;32(2):309–320. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90243-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rosenbaum J. L., Carlson K. Cilia regeneration in Tetrahymena and its inhibition by colchicine. J Cell Biol. 1969 Feb;40(2):415–425. doi: 10.1083/jcb.40.2.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Salmon E. D. Spindle microtubules: thermodynamics of in vivo assembly and role in chromosome movement. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;253:383–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb19216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sato H., Ellis G. W., Inoué S. Microtubular origin of mitotic spindle form birefringence. Demonstration of the applicability of Wiener's equation. J Cell Biol. 1975 Dec;67(3):501–517. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.3.501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sluder G. Experimental manipulation of the amount of tubulin available for assembly into the spindle of dividing sea urchin eggs. J Cell Biol. 1976 Jul;70(1):75–85. doi: 10.1083/jcb.70.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stubblefield E., Klevecz R., Deaven L. Synchronized mammalian cell cultures. I. Cell replication cycle and macromolecular synthesis following brief colcemid arrest of mitosis. J Cell Physiol. 1967 Jun;69(3):345–353. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040690311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stubblefield E., Klevecz R. Synchronization of Chinese hamster cells by reversal of colcemid inhibition. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Dec;40(3):660–664. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90244-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. TAYLOR E. W. THE MECHANISM OF COLCHICINE INHIBITION OF MITOSIS. I. KINETICS OF INHIBITION AND THE BINDING OF H3-COLCHICINE. J Cell Biol. 1965 Apr;25:SUPPL–SUPPL:160. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.1.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wilson L., Bamburg J. R., Mizel S. B., Grisham L. M., Creswell K. M. Interaction of drugs with microtubule proteins. Fed Proc. 1974 Feb;33(2):158–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wilson L., Friedkin M. The biochemical events of mitosis. II. The in vivo and in vitro binding of colchicine in grasshopper embryos and its possible relation to inhibition of mitosis. Biochemistry. 1967 Oct;6(10):3126–3135. doi: 10.1021/bi00862a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wilson L. Microtubules as drug receptors: pharmacological properties of microtubule protein. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;253:213–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb19201.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zimmerman A. M., Zimmerman S. Action of colcemid in sea urchin eggs. J Cell Biol. 1967 Aug;34(2):483–488. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.2.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES