Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1979 Jul 1;82(1):150–173. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.1.150

Organization of acetylcholine receptors in quick-frozen, deep-etched, and rotary-replicated Torpedo postsynaptic membrane

PMCID: PMC2110412  PMID: 479296

Abstract

The receptor-rich postsynaptic membrane of the elasmobranch electric organ was fixed by quick-freezing and then viewed by freeze-fracture, deep-etching and rotary-replication. Traditional freeze-fracture revealed a distinct, geometrical pattern of shallow 8.5-nm bumps on the E fracture-face, similar to the lattice which has been seen before in chemically fixed material, but seen less clearly than after quick- freezing. Fracture plus deep-etching brought into view on the true outside of this membrane a similar geometrical pattern of 8.5-nm projections rising out of the membrane surface. The individual projections looked like structures that have been seen in negatively stained or deep-etched membrane fragments and have been identified as individual acetylcholine receptor molecules. The surface protrusions were twice as abundant as the large intramembrane particles that characterize the fracture faces of this membrane, which have also been considered to be receptor molecules. Particle counts have always been too low to match the estimates of postsynaptic receptor density derived from physiological and biochemical studies; counts of surface projections, however, more closely matched these estimates. Rotary- replication of quick-frozen, etched postsynaptic membranes enhanced the visibility of these surface protuberances and illustrated that they often occur in dimers, tetramers, and ordered rows. The variations in these surface patterns suggested that in vivo, receptors in the postsynaptic membrane may tend to pack into "liquid crystals" which constantly appear, flow, and disappear in the fluid environment of the membrane. Additionally, deep-etching revealed a distinct web of cytoplasmic filaments beneath the postsynaptic membrane, and revealed the basal lamina above it; and delineated possible points of contact between these structures and the membrane proper.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson M. J., Cohen M. W. Fluorescent staining of acetylcholine receptors in vertebrate skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1974 Mar;237(2):385–400. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson M. J., Cohen M. W. Nerve-induced and spontaneous redistribution of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;268(3):757–773. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Axelrod D., Ravdin P., Koppel D. E., Schlessinger J., Webb W. W., Elson E. L., Podleski T. R. Lateral motion of fluorescently labeled acetylcholine receptors in membranes of developing muscle fibers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Dec;73(12):4594–4598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.12.4594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bachmann L., Abermann R., Zingsheim H. P. Hochauflösende Gefrierätzung. Histochemie. 1969;20(2):133–142. doi: 10.1007/BF00268707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Betz W., Sakmann B. Effects of proteolytic enzymes on function and structure of frog neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol. 1973 May;230(3):673–688. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brockes J. P., Hall Z. W. Acetylcholine receptors in normal and denervated rat diaphragm muscle. II. Comparison of junctional and extrajunctional receptors. Biochemistry. 1975 May 20;14(10):2100–2106. doi: 10.1021/bi00681a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cartaud J., Benedetti E. L. A morphological study of the cholinergic receptor protein from Torpedo marmorata in its membrane environment and in its detergent-extracted purified form. J Cell Sci. 1978 Feb;29:313–337. doi: 10.1242/jcs.29.1.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cartaud J., Bon S., Massoulié J. Electrophorus acetylcholinesterase. Biochemical and electron microscope characterization of low ionic strength aggregates. J Cell Biol. 1978 May;77(2):315–322. doi: 10.1083/jcb.77.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Edidin M., Fambrough D. Fluidity of the surface of cultured muscle fibers. Rapid lateral diffusion of marked surface antigens. J Cell Biol. 1973 Apr;57(1):27–37. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodenough D. A., Paul D. L., Culbert K. E. Correlative gap junction ultrastructure. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1978;14(2):83–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gross H., Bas E., Moor H. Freeze-fracturing in ultrahigh vacuum at -196 degrees C. J Cell Biol. 1978 Mar;76(3):712–728. doi: 10.1083/jcb.76.3.712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall Z. W., Kelly R. B. Enzymatic detachment of endplate acetylcholinesterase from muscle. Nat New Biol. 1971 Jul 14;232(28):62–63. doi: 10.1038/newbio232062a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Heuser J. E., Reese T. S., Dennis M. J., Jan Y., Jan L., Evans L. Synaptic vesicle exocytosis captured by quick freezing and correlated with quantal transmitter release. J Cell Biol. 1979 May;81(2):275–300. doi: 10.1083/jcb.81.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Heuser J. E., Reese T. S., Landis D. M. Functional changes in frog neuromuscular junctions studied with freeze-fracture. J Neurocytol. 1974 Mar;3(1):109–131. doi: 10.1007/BF01111936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Heuser J. E., Reese T. S., Landis D. M. Preservation of synaptic structure by rapid freezing. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1976;40:17–24. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1976.040.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Karlin A., Holtzman E., Valderrama R., Damle V., Hsu K., Reyes F. Binding of antibodies to acetylcholine receptors in Electrophorus and Torpedo electroplax membranes. J Cell Biol. 1978 Mar;76(3):577–592. doi: 10.1083/jcb.76.3.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Karlin A., Weill C. L., McNamee M. G., Valderrama R. Facets of the structures of acetylcholine receptors from Electrophorus and Torpedo. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1976;40:203–210. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1976.040.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Katz B., Miledi R. The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665–699. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kistler J., Kellenberger E. Collapse phenomena in freeze-drying. J Ultrastruct Res. 1977 Apr;59(1):70–75. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(77)80029-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lindstrom J., Einarson B., Merlie J. Immunization of rats with polypeptide chains from torpedo acetylcholine receptor causes an autoimmune response to receptors in rat muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Feb;75(2):769–773. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.2.769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lwebuga-Mukasa J. S., Lappi S., Taylor P. Molecular forms of acetylcholinesterase from Torpedo californica: their relationship to synaptic membranes. Biochemistry. 1976 Apr 6;15(7):1425–1434. doi: 10.1021/bi00652a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Margaritis L. H., Elgsaeter A., Branton D. Rotary replication for freeze-etching. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jan;72(1):47–56. doi: 10.1083/jcb.72.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. McMahan U. J., Sanes J. R., Marshall L. M. Cholinesterase is associated with the basal lamina at the neuromuscular junction. Nature. 1978 Jan 12;271(5641):172–174. doi: 10.1038/271172a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Misra D. N., Das Gupta N. N. Distortion in dimensions produced by shadowing for electron microscopy. J R Microsc Soc. 1965 Sep;84(3):373–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mooseker M. S., Tilney L. G. Organization of an actin filament-membrane complex. Filament polarity and membrane attachment in the microvilli of intestinal epithelial cells. J Cell Biol. 1975 Dec;67(3):725–743. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.3.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nickel E., Potter L. T. Ultrastructure of isolated membranes of Torpedo electric tissue. Brain Res. 1973 Jul 27;57(2):508–517. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90158-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Peng H. B., Nakajima Y. Membrane particle aggregates in innervated and noninnervated cultures of Xenopus embryonic muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jan;75(1):500–504. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.1.500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Peper K., Dreyer F., Müller K. D. Analysis of cooperativity of drug-receptor interaction by quantitative iontophoresis at frog motor end plates. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1976;40:187–192. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1976.040.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Peper K., Dreyer F., Sandri C., Akert K., Moor H. Structure and ultrastructure of the frog motor endplate. A freeze-etching study. Cell Tissue Res. 1974 Jun 24;149(4):437–455. doi: 10.1007/BF00223024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Peracchia C. Gap junctions. Structural changes after uncoupling procedures. J Cell Biol. 1977 Mar;72(3):628–641. doi: 10.1083/jcb.72.3.628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Popot J. L., Sugiyama H., Changeux J. P. Studies on the electrogenic action of acetylcholine with Torpedo marmorata electric organ. II. The permeability response of the receptor-rich membrane fragments to cholinergic agonists in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1976 Sep 25;106(3):469–483. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90247-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Potter L. T., Smith D. S. Postsynaptic membranes in the electric tissue of Narcine: I. Organization and innervation of electric cells. Fine structure of nicotinic receptor-channel molecules revealed by transmission microscopy. Tissue Cell. 1977;9(4):585–594. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(77)90028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Raftery M. A., Vandlen R. L., Reed K. L., Lee T. Characterization of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor: its subunit composition and ligand-binding properties. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1976;40:193–202. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1976.040.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rash J. E., Ellisman M. H. Studies of excitable membranes. I. Macromolecular specializations of the neuromuscular junction and the nonjunctional sarcolemma. J Cell Biol. 1974 Nov;63(2 Pt 1):567–586. doi: 10.1083/jcb.63.2.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rosenbluth J. Synaptic membrane structure in Torpedo electric organ. J Neurocytol. 1975 Dec;4(6):697–712. doi: 10.1007/BF01181631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ross M. J., Klymkowsky M. W., Agard D. A., Stroud R. M. Structural studies of a membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. J Mol Biol. 1977 Nov;116(4):635–659. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90264-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Salpeter M. M., Elderfrawi M. E. Sizes of end plate compartments, densities of acetylcholine receptor and other quantitative aspects of neuromuscular transmission. J Histochem Cytochem. 1973 Sep;21(9):769–778. doi: 10.1177/21.9.769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sobel A., Weber M., Changeux J. P. Large-scale purification of the acetylcholine-receptor protein in its membrane-bound and detergent-extracted forms from Torpedo marmorata electric organ. Eur J Biochem. 1977 Oct 17;80(1):215–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11874.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES