Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1979 Oct 1;83(1):109–115. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.1.109

Isolation and characterization of two forms of a cytoskeleton

PMCID: PMC2110439  PMID: 574512

Abstract

Isolated petaloid coelomocytes from the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis transform to a filopodial morphology in hypotonic media. Electron micrographs of negatively stained Triton-insoluble cytoskeletons show that the petaloid form consists of a loose net of microfilaments while the filopodial form consists of paracrystalline bundles of microfilaments. Actin is the major protein of both forms of the cytoskeleton. Additional polypeptides have molecular weights of approximately 220,000, 64,000, 57,000, and 27,000 daltons. Relative to actin the filopodial cytoskeletons have an average of 2.5 times as much 57k polypeptide as the petaloid cytoskeletons. Treatment with 0.25 M NaCl dissociates the filament bundles into individual actin filaments free of the actin-associated polypeptides. Thus, one or more of these actin-associated polypeptides may be responsible for crosslinking the actin filaments into bundles and maintaining the three-dimensional nature of the cytoskeletons.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (645.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Begg D. A., Rodewald R., Rebhun L. I. The visualization of actin filament polarity in thin sections. Evidence for the uniform polarity of membrane-associated filaments. J Cell Biol. 1978 Dec;79(3):846–852. doi: 10.1083/jcb.79.3.846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown S., Levinson W., Spudich J. A. Cytoskeletal elements of chick embryo fibroblasts revealed by detergent extraction. J Supramol Struct. 1976;5(2):119–130. doi: 10.1002/jss.400050203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryan J., Kane R. E. Separation and interaction of the major components of sea urchin actin gel. J Mol Biol. 1978 Oct 25;125(2):207–224. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90345-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buckley I. K., Porter K. R. Cytoplasmic fibrils in living cultured cells. A light and electron microscope study. Protoplasma. 1967;64(4):349–380. doi: 10.1007/BF01666538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burgess D. R., Schroeder T. E. Polarized bundles of actin filaments within microvilli of fertilized sea urchin eggs. J Cell Biol. 1977 Sep;74(3):1032–1037. doi: 10.1083/jcb.74.3.1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DeRosier D., Mandelkow E., Silliman A. Structure of actin-containing filaments from two types of non-muscle cells. J Mol Biol. 1977 Jul 15;113(4):679–695. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90230-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edds K. T. Dynamic aspects of filopodial formation by reorganization of microfilaments. J Cell Biol. 1977 May;73(2):479–491. doi: 10.1083/jcb.73.2.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fairbanks G., Steck T. L., Wallach D. F. Electrophoretic analysis of the major polypeptides of the human erythrocyte membrane. Biochemistry. 1971 Jun 22;10(13):2606–2617. doi: 10.1021/bi00789a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Herman I. M., Pollard T. D. Comparison of purified anti-actin and fluorescent-heavy meromyosin staining patterns in dividing cells. J Cell Biol. 1979 Mar;80(3):509–520. doi: 10.1083/jcb.80.3.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ishikawa H., Bischoff R., Holtzer H. Formation of arrowhead complexes with heavy meromyosin in a variety of cell types. J Cell Biol. 1969 Nov;43(2):312–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kane R. E. Actin polymerization and interaction with other proteins in temperature-induced gelation of sea urchin egg extracts. J Cell Biol. 1976 Dec;71(3):704–714. doi: 10.1083/jcb.71.3.704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lazarides E., Weber K. Actin antibody: the specific visualization of actin filaments in non-muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jun;71(6):2268–2272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.6.2268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mooseker M. S., Tilney L. G. Organization of an actin filament-membrane complex. Filament polarity and membrane attachment in the microvilli of intestinal epithelial cells. J Cell Biol. 1975 Dec;67(3):725–743. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.3.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Osborn M., Weber K. The detertent-resistant cytoskeleton of tissue culture cells includes the nucleus and the microfilament bundles. Exp Cell Res. 1977 May;106(2):339–349. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(77)90179-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stossel T. P., Hartwig J. H. Interactions between actin, myosin, and an actin-binding protein from rabbit alveolar macrophages. Alveolar macrophage myosin Mg-2+-adenosine triphosphatase requires a cofactor for activation by actin. J Biol Chem. 1975 Jul 25;250(14):5706–5712. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tilney L. G. Actin filaments in the acrosomal reaction of Limulus sperm. Motion generated by alterations in the packing of the filaments. J Cell Biol. 1975 Feb;64(2):289–310. doi: 10.1083/jcb.64.2.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Trotter J. A., Foerder B. A., Keller J. M. Intracellular fibres in cultured cells: analysis by scanning and transmission electron microscopy and by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J Cell Sci. 1978 Jun;31:369–392. doi: 10.1242/jcs.31.1.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weber K., Pringle J. R., Osborn M. Measurement of molecular weights by electrophoresis on SDS-acrylamide gel. Methods Enzymol. 1972;26:3–27. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(72)26003-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES