Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1979 Aug 1;82(2):542–554. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.2.542

Micromanipulation studies of chromosome movement. II. Birefringent chromosomal fibers and the mechanical attachment of chromosomes to the spindle

PMCID: PMC2110473  PMID: 479316

Abstract

The degree of mechanical coupling of chromosomes to the spindles of Nephrotoma and Trimeratropis primary spermatocytes varies with the stage of meiosis and the birefringent retardation of the chromosomal fibers. In early prometaphase, before birefringent chromosomal fibers have formed, a bivalent can be displaced toward a spindle pole by a single, continuous pull with a microneedle. Resistance to poleward displacement increases with increased development of the chromosomal fibers, reaching a maximum at metaphase. At this stage kinetochores cannot be displaced greater than 1 micrometer toward either spindle pole, even by a force which is sufficient to displace the entire spindle within the cell. The abolition of birefringence with either colcemid or vinblastine results in the loss of chromosome-spindle attachment. In the absence of birefringent fibers a chromosome can be displaced anywhere within the cell. The photochemical inactivation of colcemid by irradiation with 366-nm light results in the reformation of birefringent chromosomal fibers and the concomitant re-establishment of chromosome attachment to the spindle. These results support the hypothesis that the birefringent chromosomal fibers anchor the chromosomes to the spindle and transmit the force for anaphase chromosome movement.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aronson J., Inoué S. Reversal by light of the action of N-methyl N-desacetyl colchicine on mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1970 May;45(2):470–477. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.2.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Begg D. A., Ellis G. W. Micromanipulation studies of chromosome movement. I. Chromosome-spindle attachment and the mechanical properties of chromosomal spindle fibers. J Cell Biol. 1979 Aug;82(2):528–541. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.2.528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Byers H. R., Porter K. R. Transformations in the structure of the cytoplasmic ground substance in erythrophores during pigment aggregation and dispersion. I. A study using whole-cell preparations in stereo high voltage electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1977 Nov;75(2 Pt 1):541–558. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.2.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dietz R. Bau ud Fnktion des Spindelapparats. Naturwissenschaften. 1969 May;56(5):237–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00633917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Forer A. Characterization of the mitotic traction system, and evidence that birefringent spindle fibers neither produce nor transmit force for chromosome movement. Chromosoma. 1966;19(1):44–98. doi: 10.1007/BF00332793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fujiwara K., Pollard T. D. Simultaneous localization of myosin and tubulin in human tissue culture cells by double antibody staining. J Cell Biol. 1978 Apr;77(1):182–195. doi: 10.1083/jcb.77.1.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fuseler J. W. Temperature dependence of anaphase chromosome velocity and microtubule depolymerization. J Cell Biol. 1975 Dec;67(3):789–800. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.3.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldman R. D., Rebhun L. I. The structure and some properties of the isolated mitotic apparatus. J Cell Sci. 1969 Jan;4(1):179–209. doi: 10.1242/jcs.4.1.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Inoué S., Ritter H., Jr Dynamics of mitotic spindle organization and function. Soc Gen Physiol Ser. 1975;30:3–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Inoué S., Sato H. Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):259–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Malawista S. E., Sato H., Bensch K. G. Vinblastine and griseofulvin reversibly disrupt the living mitotic spindle. Science. 1968 May 17;160(3829):770–772. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3829.770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mc2ntosh J. R., Cande Z., Snyder J., Vanderslice K. Studies on the mechanism of mitosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;253:407–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb19217.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McIntosh J. R., Cande W. Z., Snyder J. A. Structure and physiology of the mammalian mitotic spindle. Soc Gen Physiol Ser. 1975;30:31–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nicklas R. B. Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis. Chromosoma. 1967;21(1):17–50. doi: 10.1007/BF00330545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nicklas R. B., Staehly C. A. Chromosome micromanipulation. I. The mechanics of chromosome attachment to the spindle. Chromosoma. 1967;21(1):1–16. doi: 10.1007/BF00330544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Osborn M., Webster R. E., Weber K. Individual microtubules viewed by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy in the same PtK2 cell. J Cell Biol. 1978 Jun;77(3):R27–R34. doi: 10.1083/jcb.77.3.r27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rebhun L. I., Sander G. Ultrastructure and birefringence of the isolated mitotic apparatus of marine eggs. J Cell Biol. 1967 Sep;34(3):859–883. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.3.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ritter H., Jr, Inoué S., Kubai D. Mitosis in Barbulanympha. I. Spindle structure, formation, and kinetochore engagement. J Cell Biol. 1978 Jun;77(3):638–654. doi: 10.1083/jcb.77.3.638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Salmon E. D. Pressure-induced depolymerization of spindle microtubules. I. Changes in birefringence and spindle length. J Cell Biol. 1975 Jun;65(3):603–614. doi: 10.1083/jcb.65.3.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Salmon E. D. Spindle microtubules: thermodynamics of in vivo assembly and role in chromosome movement. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;253:383–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb19216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sato H., Ellis G. W., Inoué S. Microtubular origin of mitotic spindle form birefringence. Demonstration of the applicability of Wiener's equation. J Cell Biol. 1975 Dec;67(3):501–517. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.3.501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Weber K., Rathke P. C., Osborn M. Cytoplasmic microtubular images in glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue culture cells by electron microscopy and by immunofluorescence microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Apr;75(4):1820–1824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.4.1820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilson L. Microtubules as drug receptors: pharmacological properties of microtubule protein. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;253:213–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb19201.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES