Abstract
Mammalian cells in culture (BHK-21, PtK2, Friend, human flia, and glioma cells) have been observed by reflection contrast microscopy. Images of cells photographed at two different wavelengths (546 and 436 nm) or at two different angles of incidence allowed discrimination between reflected light and light that was both reflected and modulated by interference. Interference is involved when a change in reflected intensity (relative to glass/medium background reflected intensity) occurs on changing either the illumination wavelength or the reflection incidence angle. In cases where interference occurs, refractive indices can be determined at points where the optical path difference is known, by solving the given interference equation. Where cells are at least 50 nm distant from the glass substrate, intensities are also influenced by that distance as well as by the light's angle of incidence and wavelength. The reflected intensity at the glass/medium interface is used as a standard in calculating the refractive index of the cortical cytoplasm. Refractive indices were found to be higher (1.38--1.40) at points of focal contact, where stress fibers terminate, than in areas of close contact (1.354--1.368). In areas of the cortical cytoplasm, between focal contacts, not adherent to the glass substrate, refractive indices between 1.353 and 1.368 were found. This was thought to result from a microfilamentous network within the cortical cytoplasm. Intimate attachment of cells to their substrate is assumed to be characterized by a lack of an intermediate layer of culture medium.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ALLEN R. D., COWDEN R. R. Syneresis in ameboid movement: its localization by interference microscopy and its significance. J Cell Biol. 1962 Jan;12:185–189. doi: 10.1083/jcb.12.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- AMBROSE E. J., JONES P. C. Surface-contact microscopy. Studies in cell movements. Med Biol Illus. 1961 Apr;11:104–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bereiter-Hahn J. A model for microtubular rigidity. Cytobiologie. 1978 Jun;17(1):298–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CURTIS A. S. THE MECHANISM OF ADHESION OF CELLS TO GLASS. A STUDY BY INTERFERENCE REFLECTION MICROSCOPY. J Cell Biol. 1964 Feb;20:199–215. doi: 10.1083/jcb.20.2.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forer A., Goldman R. D. The concentrations of dry matter in mitotic apparatuses in vivo and after isolation from sea-urchin zygotes. J Cell Sci. 1972 Mar;10(2):387–418. doi: 10.1242/jcs.10.2.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friend C., Scher W., Holland J. G., Sato T. Hemoglobin synthesis in murine virus-induced leukemic cells in vitro: stimulation of erythroid differentiation by dimethyl sulfoxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Feb;68(2):378–382. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.2.378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldman R. D., Berg G., Bushnell A., Chang C. M., Dickerman L., Hopkins N., Miller M. L., Pollack R., Wang E. Fibrillar systems in cell motility. Ciba Found Symp. 1973;14:83–107. doi: 10.1002/9780470719978.ch5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldman R. D. The role of three cytoplasmic fibers in BHK-21 cell motility. I. Microtubules and the effects of colchicine. J Cell Biol. 1971 Dec;51(3):752–762. doi: 10.1083/jcb.51.3.752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heath J. P., Dunn G. A. Cell to substratum contacts of chick fibroblasts and their relation to the microfilament system. A correlated interference-reflexion and high-voltage electron-microscope study. J Cell Sci. 1978 Feb;29:197–212. doi: 10.1242/jcs.29.1.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ingram V. M. A side view of moving fibroblasts. Nature. 1969 May 17;222(5194):641–644. doi: 10.1038/222641a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Izzard C. S., Lochner L. R. Cell-to-substrate contacts in living fibroblasts: an interference reflexion study with an evaluation of the technique. J Cell Sci. 1976 Jun;21(1):129–159. doi: 10.1242/jcs.21.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lazarides E., Weber K. Actin antibody: the specific visualization of actin filaments in non-muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jun;71(6):2268–2272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.6.2268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ludueña M. A., Wessells N. K. Cell locomotion, nerve elongation, and microfilaments. Dev Biol. 1973 Feb;30(2):427–440. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90100-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osborn M., Franke W. W., Weber K. Visualization of a system of filaments 7-10 nm thick in cultured cells of an epithelioid line (Pt K2) by immunofluorescence microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jun;74(6):2490–2494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.6.2490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pollard T. D. Functional implications of the biochemical and structural properties of cytoplasmic contractile proteins. Soc Gen Physiol Ser. 1975;30:259–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rees D. A., Lloyd C. W., Thom D. Control of grip and stick in cell adhesion through lateral relationships of membrane glycoproteins. Nature. 1977 May 12;267(5607):124–128. doi: 10.1038/267124a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Revel J. P., Wolken K. Electronmicroscope investigations of the underside of cells in culture. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Mar 30;78(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90031-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weber K., Pollack R., Bibring T. Antibody against tuberlin: the specific visualization of cytoplasmic microtubules in tissue culture cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Feb;72(2):459–463. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.2.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wessells N. K., Spooner B. S., Ludueña M. A. Surface movements, microfilaments and cell locomotion. Ciba Found Symp. 1973;14:53–82. doi: 10.1002/9780470719978.ch4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]