Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1980 Jan 1;84(1):203–210. doi: 10.1083/jcb.84.1.203

Aggregation-dependent turnover of flagellar adhesion molecules in chlamydomonas gametes

WJ Snell, WS Moore
PMCID: PMC2110524  PMID: 7350168

Abstract

Previous studies on flagellar adhesion in chlamydomonas (Snell, W. and S. Roseman. 1979. J. Biol. Chem. 254:10820-10829.) have shown that as gametes adhere to flagella isolated from gametes of the opposite mating type, the adhsiveness of the added flagella but not of the gametes is lost. The studies reported here show that the addition of protein synthesis inhibitors (cycloheximide [CH] or anisomycin) to the medium of such cell- flagella mixtures causes the cells to lose their adhesiveness. This loss, however, occurs only after the cells have interacted with 4-8 flagella/cell and does not occur if the cells are kept in CH (7 h) without aggregating. The availability of an impotent (imp) mating type plus (MT(+)) mutant (provided by U.W. Goodenough), which adheres but is unable to undergo the fusion that normally follows adhesion, made it possible to determine whether a similar loss of adhesiveness occurs in mixtures of matting type minus (mt(-)) and imp mt(+) gametes. In the absence of inhibitor, mt(-) and imp mt(+) gametes adhered to each other (without fusing) for several hours; however, in the presence of CH or anisomycin, the gametes began to de-adhere 35 min after mixing, and, by 90 min, 100 percent of the cells were single again. This effect was reversible, and the rapid turnover of cells were single again. This effect was reversible, and the rapid turnover of molecules involved in adhesion occurred only during adhesion inasmuch as gametes pretreated for 4 h with CH were able to aggregate in CH for the same length of time as nonpretreated cells aggregated in CH. By the addition of CH at various times after the mt(-) and imp mt(+) gametes were mixed, measurements were made of the “pool size” of the molecules involved in adhesion. The pool reached a minimum after 25 min of aggregation, rapidly increased for the next 25 min, and then leveled off at the premixing level. These results suggest that flagellar adhesion in chlamydomonas causes modification of surface molecules (receptors, ligands), which brings about their inactivation and stimulates their replacement.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (620.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bloodgood R. A., Leffler E. M., Bojczuk A. T. Reversible inhibition of Chlamydomonas flagellar surface motility. J Cell Biol. 1979 Sep;82(3):664–674. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.3.664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloodgood R. A. Motility occurring in association with the surface of the Chlamydomonas flagellum. J Cell Biol. 1977 Dec;75(3):983–989. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.3.983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chiang K. S., Kates J. R., Jones R. F., Sueoka N. On the formation of a homogeneous zygotic population in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Dev Biol. 1970 Aug;22(4):655–669. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(70)90174-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chua N. H., Gillham N. W. The sites of synthesis of the principal thylakoid membrane polypeptides in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Cell Biol. 1977 Aug;74(2):441–452. doi: 10.1083/jcb.74.2.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Claes H. Autolyse der Zellwand bei den Gemeten von Chlamydomonas reinhardii. Arch Mikrobiol. 1971;78(2):180–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodenough U. W., Hwang C., Martin H. Isolation and genetic analysis of mutant strains of Chlamydomonas reinhardi defective in gametic differentiation. Genetics. 1976 Feb;82(2):169–186. doi: 10.1093/genetics/82.2.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodenough U. W., Jurivich D. Tipping and mating-structure activation induced in Chlamydomonas gametes by flagellar membrane antisera. J Cell Biol. 1978 Dec;79(3):680–693. doi: 10.1083/jcb.79.3.680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lefebvre P. A., Nordstrom S. A., Moulder J. E., Rosenbaum J. L. Flagellar elongation and shortening in Chlamydomonas. IV. Effects of flagellar detachment, regeneration, and resorption on the induction of flagellar protein synthesis. J Cell Biol. 1978 Jul;78(1):8–27. doi: 10.1083/jcb.78.1.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McLean R. J., Brown R. M. Cell surface differentiation of Chlamydomonas during gametogenesis. I. Mating and concanavalin A agglutinability. Dev Biol. 1974 Feb;36(2):279–285. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(74)90051-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roseman S. The synthesis of complex carbohydrates by multiglycosyltransferase systems and their potential function in intercellular adhesion. Chem Phys Lipids. 1970 Oct;5(1):270–297. doi: 10.1016/0009-3084(70)90024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rosenbaum J. L., Moulder J. E., Ringo D. L. Flagellar elongation and shortening in Chlamydomonas. The use of cycloheximide and colchicine to study the synthesis and assembly of flagellar proteins. J Cell Biol. 1969 May;41(2):600–619. doi: 10.1083/jcb.41.2.600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SAGER R., GRANICK S. Nutritional control of sexuality in Chlamydomonas reinhardi. J Gen Physiol. 1954 Jul 20;37(6):729–742. doi: 10.1085/jgp.37.6.729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Snell W. J., Dentler W. L., Haimo L. T., Binder L. I., Rosenbaum J. L. Assembly of chick brain tubulin onto isolated basal bodies of Chlamydomonas reinhardi. Science. 1974 Jul 26;185(4148):357–360. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4148.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Snell W. J. Mating in Chlamydomonas: a system for the study of specific cell adhesion. I. Ultrastructural and electrophoretic analyses of flagellar surface components involved in adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1976 Jan;68(1):48–69. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.1.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Snell W. J. Mating in Chlamydomonas: a system for the study of specific cell adhesion. II. A radioactive flagella-binding assay for quantitation of adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1976 Jan;68(1):70–79. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.1.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Snell W. J., Roseman S. Kinetics of adhesion and de-adhesion of Chlamydomonas gametes. J Biol Chem. 1979 Nov 10;254(21):10820–10829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Umbreit J., Roseman S. A requirement for reversible binding between aggregating embryonic cells before stable adhesion. J Biol Chem. 1975 Dec 25;250(24):9360–9368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Weeks D. P., Collis P. S. Induction of microtubule protein synthesis in Chlamydomonas reinhardi during flagellar regeneration. Cell. 1976 Sep;9(1):15–27. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90048-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Witman G. B., Carlson K., Berliner J., Rosenbaum J. L. Chlamydomonas flagella. I. Isolation and electrophoretic analysis of microtubules, matrix, membranes, and mastigonemes. J Cell Biol. 1972 Sep;54(3):507–539. doi: 10.1083/jcb.54.3.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES