Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1974 Nov 1;63(2):567–586. doi: 10.1083/jcb.63.2.567

STUDIES OF EXCITABLE MEMBRANES

I. Macromolecular Specializations of the Neuromuscular Junction and the Nonjunctional Sarcolemma

John E Rash 1, Mark H Ellisman 1
PMCID: PMC2110927  PMID: 4138515

Abstract

The neuromuscular junctions and nonjunctional sarcolemmas of mammalian skeletal muscle fibers were studied by conventional thin-section electron microscopy and freeze-fracture techniques. A modified acetylcholinesterase staining procedure that is compatible with light microscopy, conventional thin-section electron microscopy, and freeze-fracture techniques is described. Freeze-fracture replicas were utilized to visualize the internal macromolecular architecture of the nerve terminal membrane, the chemically excitable neuromuscular junction postsynaptic folds, and the electrically excitable nonjunctional sarcolemma. The nerve terminal membrane is characterized by two parallel rows of 100–110-Å particles which may be associated with synpatic vesicle fusion and release. On the postsynpatic folds, irregular rows of densely packed 110–140-Å particles were observed and evidence is assembled which indicates that these large transmembrane macromolecules may represent the morphological correlate for functional acetylcholine receptor activity in mammalian motor endplates. Differences in the size and distribution of particles in mammalian as compared with amphibian and fish postsynaptic junctional membranes are correlated with current biochemical and electron micrograph autoradiographic data. Orthogonal arrays of 60-Å particles were observed in the split postsynaptic sarcolemmas of many diaphragm myofibers. On the basis of differences in the number and distribution of these "square" arrays within the sarcolemmas, two classes of fibers were identified in the diaphragm. Subsequent confirmation of the fiber types as fast- and slow-twitch fibers (Ellisman et al. 1974. J. Cell Biol. 63[2, Pt. 2]:93 a. [Abstr.]) may indicate a possible role for the square arrays in the electrogenic mechanism. Experiments in progress involving specific labeling techniques are expected to permit positive identification of many of these intriguing transmembrane macromolecules.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albuquerque E. X., Barnard E. A., Chiu T. H., Lapa A. J., Dolly J. O., Jansson S. E., Daly J., Witkop B. Acetylcholine receptor and ion conductance modulator sites at the murine neuromuscular junction: evidence from specific toxin reactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Mar;70(3):949–953. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.3.949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albuquerque E. X., Barnard E. A., Porter C. W., Warnick J. E. The density of acetylcholine receptors and their sensitivity in the postsynaptic membrane of muscle endplates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jul;71(7):2818–2822. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.7.2818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albuquerque E. X., Daly J. W., Witkop B. Batrachotoxin: chemistry and pharmacology. Science. 1971 Jun 4;172(3987):995–1002. doi: 10.1126/science.172.3987.995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Albuquerque E. X., Kuba K., Daly J. Effect of histrionicotoxin on the ionic conductance modulator of the cholinergic receptor: a quantitative analysis of the end-plate current. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1974 May;189(2):513–524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Albuquerque E. X., Sokoll M. D., Sonesson B., Thesleff S. Studies on the nature of the cholinergic receptor. Eur J Pharmacol. 1968 Aug;4(1):40–46. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(68)90007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Albuquerque E. X., Thesleff S. A comparative study of membrane properties of innervated and chronically denervated fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat. Acta Physiol Scand. 1968 Aug;73(4):471–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-201x.1968.tb10886.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Albuquerque E. X., Warnick J. E., Sansone F. M. The pharmacology of batrachotoxin. II. Effect on electrical properties of the mammalian nerve and skeletal muscle membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1971 Mar;176(3):511–528. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. BIRKS R., HUXLEY H. E., KATZ B. The fine structure of the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1960 Jan;150:134–144. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Baker P. F., Meves H., Ridgway E. B. Effects of manganese and other agents on the calcium uptake that follows depolarization of squid axons. J Physiol. 1973 Jun;231(3):511–526. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Baker P. F., Willis J. S. Binding of the cardiac glycoside ouabain to intact cells. J Physiol. 1972 Jul;224(2):441–462. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bertaud W. S., Rayns D. G., Simpson F. O. Freeze-etch studies on fish skeletal muscle. J Cell Sci. 1970 Mar;6(2):537–557. doi: 10.1242/jcs.6.2.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Betz W., Sakmann B. "Disjunction" of frog neuromuscular synapses by treatment with proteolytic enzymes. Nat New Biol. 1971 Jul 21;232(29):94–95. doi: 10.1038/newbio232094a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Betz W., Sakmann B. Effects of proteolytic enzymes on function and structure of frog neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol. 1973 May;230(3):673–688. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bourgeois J. -P., Ryter A., Menez A., Fromageot P., Boquet P., Changeux J. -P. Localization of the cholinergic receptor protein in Electrophorus electroplax by high resolution autoradiography. FEBS Lett. 1972 Sep 1;25(1):127–133. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(72)80469-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Branton D. Fracture faces of frozen membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 May;55(5):1048–1056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.55.5.1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cartaud J., Benedetti E. L., Cohen J. B., Meunier J. C., Changeux J. P. Presence of a lattice structure in membrane fragments rich in nicotinic receptor protein from the electric organ of Torpedo marmorata. FEBS Lett. 1973 Jun 15;33(1):109–113. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(73)80171-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chipperfield A. R., Whittam R. Reconstitution of the sodium pump from protein and phosphatidylserine: features of ouabain binding. J Physiol. 1973 Apr;230(2):467–476. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chiu T. H., Dolly J. O., Barnard E. A. Solubilization from skeletal muscle of two components that specifically bind -bungarotoxin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1973 Mar 5;51(1):205–213. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(73)90529-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chiu T. H., Lapa A. J., Barnard E. A., Albuquerque E. X. Binding of D-tubocurarine and alpha-bungarotoxin in normal and denervated mouse muscles. Exp Neurol. 1974 May;43(2):399–413. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(74)90180-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dreyer F., Peper K., Akert K., Sandri C., Moor H. Ultrastructure of the "active zone" in the frog neuromuscular junction. Brain Res. 1973 Nov 23;62(2):373–380. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90699-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dudai Y., Herzberg M., Silman I. Molecular structures of acetylcholinesterase from electric organ tissue of the electric eel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Sep;70(9):2473–2476. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.9.2473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Eldefrawi M. E., Eldefrawi A. T. Purification and molecular properties of the acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo electroplax. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1973 Nov;159(1):362–373. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(73)90462-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fambrough D. M., Hartzell H. C. Acetylcholine receptors: number and distribution at neuromuscular junctions in rat diaphragm. Science. 1972 Apr 14;176(4031):189–191. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4031.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fambrough D., Rash J. E. Development of acetylcholine sensitivity during myogenesis. Dev Biol. 1971 Sep;26(1):55–68. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(71)90107-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fertuck H. C., Salpeter M. M. Localization of acetylcholine receptor by 125I-labeled alpha-bungarotoxin binding at mouse motor endplates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1376–1378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Grundfest H. Heterogeneity of excitable membrane: electrophysiological and pharmacological evidence and some consequences. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jul 14;137(2):901–949. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50208.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. HAGGIS G. H. Electron microscope replicas from the surface of a fracture through frozen cells. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Apr;9:841–852. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.4.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. HODGKIN A. L., HUXLEY A. F. Currents carried by sodium and potassium ions through the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo. J Physiol. 1952 Apr;116(4):449–472. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hall Z. W., Kelly R. B. Enzymatic detachment of endplate acetylcholinesterase from muscle. Nat New Biol. 1971 Jul 14;232(28):62–63. doi: 10.1038/newbio232062a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Heitzmann H. Rhodopsin is the predominant protein of rod outer segment membranes. Nat New Biol. 1972 Jan 26;235(56):114–114. doi: 10.1038/newbio235114a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hubbard J. I. Microphysiology of vertebrate neuromuscular transmission. Physiol Rev. 1973 Jul;53(3):674–723. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1973.53.3.674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. KARNOVSKY M. J., ROOTS L. A "DIRECT-COLORING" THIOCHOLINE METHOD FOR CHOLINESTERASES. J Histochem Cytochem. 1964 Mar;12:219–221. doi: 10.1177/12.3.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. KOELLE G. B. The elimination of enzymatic diffusion artifacts in the histochemical localization of cholinesterases and a survey of their cellular distributions. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1951 Oct;103(2):153–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Katz B., Miledi R. The binding of acetylcholine to receptors and its removal from the synaptic cleft. J Physiol. 1973 Jun;231(3):549–574. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kemp G., Dolly J. O., Barnard E. A., Wenner C. E. Reconstitution of a partially purified endplate acetylcholine receptor preparation in lipid bilayer membranes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1973 Sep 18;54(2):607–613. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(73)91466-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Landis D. M., Reese T. S. Arrays of particles in freeze-fractured astrocytic membranes. J Cell Biol. 1974 Jan;60(1):316–320. doi: 10.1083/jcb.60.1.316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Meunier J. C., Olsen R. W., Changeux J. P. Studies on the cholinergic receptor protein from Electrophorus electricus. Effect of detergents on some hydrodynamic properties of the receptor protein in solution. FEBS Lett. 1972 Jul 15;24(1):63–68. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(72)80827-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Napolitano L., Lebaron F., Scaletti J. Preservation of myelin lamellar structure in the absence of lipid. A correlated chemical and morphological study. J Cell Biol. 1967 Sep;34(3):817–826. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.3.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Narahashi T. Mechanism of action of tetrodotoxin and saxitoxin on excitable membranes. Fed Proc. 1972 May-Jun;31(3):1124–1132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pinto da Silva P., Douglas S. D., Branton D. Localization of A antigen sites on human erythrocyte ghosts. Nature. 1971 Jul 16;232(5307):194–196. doi: 10.1038/232194a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Porter C. W., Barnard E. A., Chiu T. H. The ultrastructural localization and quantitation of cholinergic receptors at the mouse motor endplate. J Membr Biol. 1973;14(4):383–402. doi: 10.1007/BF01868086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Raftery M. A., Schmidt J., Clark D. G. Specificity of -bungarotoxin binding to Torpedo californica electroplax. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1972 Oct;152(2):882–886. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(72)90285-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rash J. E., Staehelin L. A., Ellisman M. H. Rectangular arrays of particles on freeze-cleaved plasma membranes are not gap junctions. Exp Cell Res. 1974 May;86(1):187–190. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90670-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rayns D. G., Simpson F. O., Bertaud W. S. Surface features of striated muscle. I. Guinea-pig cardiac muscle. J Cell Sci. 1968 Dec;3(4):467–474. doi: 10.1242/jcs.3.4.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Reuter H. Divalent cations as charge carriers in excitable membranes. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1973;26:1–43. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(73)90016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rosenbluth J. Membrane specialization at an insect myoneural junction. J Cell Biol. 1973 Oct;59(1):143–149. doi: 10.1083/jcb.59.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. STEERE R. L. Electron microscopy of structural detail in frozen biological specimens. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957 Jan 25;3(1):45–60. doi: 10.1083/jcb.3.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. STEMPAK J. G., WARD R. T. AN IMPROVED STAINING METHOD FOR ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. J Cell Biol. 1964 Sep;22:697–701. doi: 10.1083/jcb.22.3.697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Salpeter M. M., Elderfrawi M. E. Sizes of end plate compartments, densities of acetylcholine receptor and other quantitative aspects of neuromuscular transmission. J Histochem Cytochem. 1973 Sep;21(9):769–778. doi: 10.1177/21.9.769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Singer S. J., Nicolson G. L. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science. 1972 Feb 18;175(4023):720–731. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4023.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Staehelin L. A. Three types of gap junctions interconnecting intestinal epithelial cells visualized by freeze-etching. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 May;69(5):1318–1321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.5.1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Streit P., Akert K., Sandri C., Livingston R. B., Moor H. Dynamic ultrastructure of presynaptic membranes at nerve terminals in the spinal cord of rats. Anesthetized and unanesthetized preparations compared. Brain Res. 1972 Dec 24;48:11–26. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90168-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. VENABLE J. H., COGGESHALL R. A SIMPLIFIED LEAD CITRATE STAIN FOR USE IN ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. J Cell Biol. 1965 May;25:407–408. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.2.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. WERMAN R. Electrical inexcitability of the frog neuromuscular synapse. J Gen Physiol. 1963 Jan;46:517–531. doi: 10.1085/jgp.46.3.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. WERMAN R. Electrical inexcitability of the synaptic membrane in the frog skeletal muscle fibre. Nature. 1960 Oct 8;188:149–150. doi: 10.1038/188149a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wilson B. W., Nieberg P. S., Walker C. R., Linkhart T. A., Fry D. M. Production and release of acetylcholinesterase by cultured chick embryo muscle. Dev Biol. 1973 Aug;33(2):285–299. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90138-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES