Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1980 Jun 1;85(3):823–838. doi: 10.1083/jcb.85.3.823

Protease effects on the structure of acetylcholine receptor membranes from Torpedo californica

PMCID: PMC2111471  PMID: 6993498

Abstract

Protease digestion of acetylcholine receptor-rich membranes derived from Torpedo californica electroplaques by homogenization and isopycnic centrifugation results in degradation of all receptor subunits without any significant effect on the appearance in electron micrographs, the toxin binding ability, or the sedimentation value of the receptor molecule. Such treatment does produce dramatic changes in the morphology of the normally 0.5- to 2-microns-diameter spherical vesicles when observed by either negative-stain or freeze-fracture electron microscopy. Removal of peripheral, apparently nonreceptor polypeptides by alkali stripping (Neubig et al. 1979, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76:690-694) results in increased sensitivity of the acetylcholine receptor membranes to the protease trypsin as indicated by SDS gel electrophoretic patterns and by the extent of morphologic change observed in vesicle structure. Trypsin digestion of alkali- stripped receptor membranes results in a limit degradation pattern of all four receptor subunits, whereupon all the vesicles undergo the morphological transformation to minivesicles. The protein-induced morphological transformation and the limit digestion pattern of receptor membranes are unaffected by whether the membranes are prepared so as to preserve the receptor as a disulfide bridged dimer, or prepared so as to generate monomeric receptor.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carroll R. C., Eldefrawi M. E., Edelstein S. J. Studies on the structure of the acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1973 Dec 10;55(3):864–872. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(73)91224-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cartaud J., Benedetti E. L. A morphological study of the cholinergic receptor protein from Torpedo marmorata in its membrane environment and in its detergent-extracted purified form. J Cell Sci. 1978 Feb;29:313–337. doi: 10.1242/jcs.29.1.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cartaud J., Benedetti E. L., Cohen J. B., Meunier J. C., Changeux J. P. Presence of a lattice structure in membrane fragments rich in nicotinic receptor protein from the electric organ of Torpedo marmorata. FEBS Lett. 1973 Jun 15;33(1):109–113. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(73)80171-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang H. W., Bock E. Molecular forms of acetylcholine receptor. Effects of calcium ions and a sulfhydryl reagent on the occurrence of oligomers. Biochemistry. 1977 Oct 4;16(20):4513–4520. doi: 10.1021/bi00639a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Claudio T., Raftery M. A. Immunological comparison of acetylcholine receptors and their subunits from species of electric ray. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1977 Jun;181(2):484–489. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(77)90254-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coakley W. T., Bater A. J., Deeley J. O. Vesicle production of heated and stressed erythrocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Sep 22;512(2):318–330. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(78)90256-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Duguid J. R., Raftery M. A. Fractionation and partial characterization of membrane particles from Torpedo californica electroplax. Biochemistry. 1973 Sep 11;12(19):3593–3597. doi: 10.1021/bi00743a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dupont Y., Cohen J. B., Changeux J. P. X-ray diffraction study of membrane fragments rich in acetylcholine receptor protein prepared from the electric organ of Torpedo marmorata. FEBS Lett. 1974 Mar 15;40(1):130–133. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(74)80910-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elliott J., Dunn S. M., Blanchard S. G., Raftery M. A. Specific binding of perhydrohistrionicotoxin to Torpedo acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jun;76(6):2576–2579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.6.2576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fambrough D. M. Control of acetylcholine receptors in skeletal muscle. Physiol Rev. 1979 Jan;59(1):165–227. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1979.59.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Froehner S. C., Rafto S. Comparison of the subunits of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor by peptide mapping. Biochemistry. 1979 Jan 23;18(2):301–307. doi: 10.1021/bi00569a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamilton S. L., McLaughlin M., Karlin A. Disulfide bond cross-linked dimer in acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1977 Dec 7;79(3):692–699. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(77)91167-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hamilton S. L., McLaughlin M., Karlin A. Formation of disulfide-linked oligomers of acetylcholine receptor in membrane from torpedo electric tissue. Biochemistry. 1979 Jan 9;18(1):155–163. doi: 10.1021/bi00568a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hartig P. R., Raftery M. A. Preparation of right-side-out, acetylcholine receptor enriched intact vesicles from Torpedo californica electroplaque membranes. Biochemistry. 1979 Apr 3;18(7):1146–1150. doi: 10.1021/bi00574a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Heidmann T., Changeux J. P. Structural and functional properties of the acetylcholine receptor protein in its purified and membrane-bound states. Annu Rev Biochem. 1978;47:317–357. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.47.070178.001533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Heuser J. E., Reese T. S., Dennis M. J., Jan Y., Jan L., Evans L. Synaptic vesicle exocytosis captured by quick freezing and correlated with quantal transmitter release. J Cell Biol. 1979 May;81(2):275–300. doi: 10.1083/jcb.81.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Heuser J. E., Salpeter S. R. Organization of acetylcholine receptors in quick-frozen, deep-etched, and rotary-replicated Torpedo postsynaptic membrane. J Cell Biol. 1979 Jul;82(1):150–173. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.1.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hucho F., Bandini G., Suárez-Isla B. A. The acetylcholine receptor as part of a protein complex in receptor-enriched membrane fragments from Torpedo californica electric tissue. Eur J Biochem. 1978 Feb;83(2):335–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1978.tb12099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kalderon N., Silman I. Water-soluble acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. Solubilization, purification and characterization. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Mar 1;465(2):331–340. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(77)90082-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Klymkowsky M. W., Stroud R. M. Immunospecific identification and three-dimensional structure of a membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. J Mol Biol. 1979 Mar 5;128(3):319–334. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90091-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Koeppe R. E., Krieger M., Stroud R. M. The effect of pre-incubation on trypsin kinetics at low pH. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Apr 12;481(2):617–621. doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(77)90294-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Margaritis L. H., Elgsaeter A., Branton D. Rotary replication for freeze-etching. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jan;72(1):47–56. doi: 10.1083/jcb.72.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Matsudaira P. T., Burgess D. R. SDS microslab linear gradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Anal Biochem. 1978 Jul 1;87(2):386–396. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90688-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meunier J. C., Sealock R., Olsen R., Changeux J. P. Purification and properties of the cholinergic receptor protein from Electrophorus electricus electric tissue. Eur J Biochem. 1974 Jun 15;45(2):371–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03563.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Neubig R. R., Krodel E. K., Boyd N. D., Cohen J. B. Acetylcholine and local anesthetic binding to Torpedo nicotinic postsynaptic membranes after removal of nonreceptor peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Feb;76(2):690–694. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.2.690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nickel E., Potter L. T. Ultrastructure of isolated membranes of Torpedo electric tissue. Brain Res. 1973 Jul 27;57(2):508–517. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90158-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nishi Y., Takesue Y. Localization of intestinal sucrase-isomaltase complex on the microvillous membrane by electron microscopy using nonlabeled antibodies. J Cell Biol. 1978 Nov;79(2 Pt 1):516–525. doi: 10.1083/jcb.79.2.516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Potter L. T., Smith D. S. Postsynaptic membranes in the electric tissue of Narcine: I. Organization and innervation of electric cells. Fine structure of nicotinic receptor-channel molecules revealed by transmission microscopy. Tissue Cell. 1977;9(4):585–594. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(77)90028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Reed K., Vandlen R., Bode J., Duguid J., Raftery M. A. Characterization of acetylcholine receptor-rich and acetylcholinesterase-rich membrane particles from Torpedo californica electroplax. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1975 Mar;167(1):138–144. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(75)90449-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ross M. J., Klymkowsky M. W., Agard D. A., Stroud R. M. Structural studies of a membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. J Mol Biol. 1977 Nov;116(4):635–659. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90264-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schiebler W., Hucho F. Membranes rich in acetylcholine receptor: characterization and reconstitution to excitable membranes from exogenous lipids. Eur J Biochem. 1978 Apr;85(1):55–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1978.tb12211.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shamoo A. E., Eldefrawi M. E. Carbamylcholine and acetylcholine-sensitive, cation-selective ionophore as part of the purified acetylcholine receptor. J Membr Biol. 1975 Dec 4;25(1-2):47–63. doi: 10.1007/BF01868567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sobel A., Weber M., Changeux J. P. Large-scale purification of the acetylcholine-receptor protein in its membrane-bound and detergent-extracted forms from Torpedo marmorata electric organ. Eur J Biochem. 1977 Oct 17;80(1):215–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11874.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stroud R. M., Kay L. M., Dickerson R. E. The structure of bovine trypsin: electron density maps of the inhibited enzyme at 5 Angstrom and at 2-7 Angstron resolution. J Mol Biol. 1974 Feb 25;83(2):185–208. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90387-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Suarez-Isla B. A., Hucho F. Acetylcholine receptor: SH group reactivity as indicator of conformational changes and functional states. FEBS Lett. 1977 Mar 15;75(1):65–69. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(77)80054-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Witzemann V., Raftery M. Specific molecular aggregates or Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Apr 14;81(3):1025–1031. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(78)91453-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES