Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1977 Dec 1;75(3):743–768. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.3.743

Surface distribution of LETS protein in relation to the cytoskeleton of normal and transformed cells

PMCID: PMC2111579  PMID: 925079

Abstract

The organization of LETS protein on the surface of NIL8 hamster cells has been examined by immunofluorescence staining. The distribution of LETS protein was found to depend on the culture conditions; in subconfluent, low-serum arrested cultures the LETS protein is predominantly located at the cell-substrate interface and also in regions of cell-cell contact, whereas in dense cultures the cells are surrounded by a network of LETS protein fibrils. Transformed derivatives of these cells exhibit only sporadic staining for LETS protein, in the form of short intercellular bridges. Agents that cause alterations in cell shape and cytoplasmic filaments have been used to explore the relationship of LETS protein to the internal cytoskeletal elements. Reciprocally, perturbations of the cell surface were examined for their effects on internal filaments. The arrangement of microtubules seems to be unrelated to the presence of LETS protein in the cells studied. Actin microfilament bundles and LETS protein respond in a coordinate fashion to some perturbants but independently with respect to others. The patterns of staining for LETS protein are consistent with an involvement in cell-to-cell and cell-to-substrate adhesion.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (9.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abercrombie M. Contact inhibition in tissue culture. In Vitro. 1970 Sep-Oct;6(2):128–142. doi: 10.1007/BF02616114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. IV. Electron microscopy of the leading lamella. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Aug;67(2):359–367. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90420-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ali I. U., Mautner V., Lanza R., Hynes R. O. Restoration of normal morphology, adhesion and cytoskeleton in transformed cells by addition of a transformation-sensitive surface protein. Cell. 1977 May;11(1):115–126. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90322-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blumberg P. M., Robbins P. W. Effect of proteases on activation of resting chick embryo fibroblasts and on cell surface proteins. Cell. 1975 Oct;6(2):137–147. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(75)90004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brinkley B. R., Fuller E. M., Highfield D. P. Cytoplasmic microtubules in normal and transformed cells in culture: analysis by tubulin antibody immunofluorescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Dec;72(12):4981–4985. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.12.4981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burger M. M. Proteolytic enzymes initiating cell division and escape from contact inhibition of growth. Nature. 1970 Jul 11;227(5254):170–171. doi: 10.1038/227170a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen L. B., Gallimore P. H., McDougall J. K. Correlation between tumor induction and the large external transformation sensitive protein on the cell surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Oct;73(10):3570–3574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.10.3570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Culp L. A. Electrophoretic analysis of substrate-attached proteins from normal and virus-transformed cells. Biochemistry. 1976 Sep 7;15(18):4094–4104. doi: 10.1021/bi00663a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Edelman G. M., Yahara I. Temperature-sensitive changes in surface modulating assemblies of fibroblasts transformed by mutants of Rous sarcoma virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jun;73(6):2047–2051. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.2047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Edidin M., Weiss A. Antigen cap formation in cultured fibroblasts: a reflection of membrane fluidity and of cell motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2456–2459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Frankel F. R. Organization and energy-dependent growth of microtubules in cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Aug;73(8):2798–2802. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.8.2798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fuller G. M., Brinkley B. R., Boughter J. M. Immunofluorescence of mitotic spindles by using monospecific antibody against bovine brain tubulin. Science. 1975 Mar 14;187(4180):948–950. doi: 10.1126/science.1096300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Graham J. M., Hynes R. O., Davidson E. A., Bainton D. F. The location of proteins labeled by the 125I-lactoperoxidase system in the NIL 8 hamster fibroblast. Cell. 1975 Apr;4(4):353–365. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(75)90156-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Helenius A., Simons K. Solubilization of membranes by detergents. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Mar 25;415(1):29–79. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(75)90016-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hogg N. M. A comparison of membrane proteins of normal and transformed cells by lactoperoxidase labeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Feb;71(2):489–492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.2.489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hynes R. O. Alteration of cell-surface proteins by viral transformation and by proteolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Nov;70(11):3170–3174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.11.3170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hynes R. O., Bye J. M. Density and cell cycle dependence of cell surface proteins in hamster fibroblasts. Cell. 1974 Oct;3(2):113–120. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(74)90114-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hynes R. O. Cell surface proteins and malignant transformation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Apr 30;458(1):73–107. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(76)90015-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hynes R. O., Destree A. Extensive disulfide bonding at the mammalian cell surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jul;74(7):2855–2859. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.7.2855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Martz E., Phillips H. M., Steinberg M. S. Contact inhibitions of overlapping and differential cell adhesion: a sufficient model for the control of certain cell culture morphologies. J Cell Sci. 1974 Nov;16(2):401–419. doi: 10.1242/jcs.16.2.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McNutt N. S., Culp L. A., Black P. H. Contact-inhibited revertant cell lines isolated from SV 40-transformed cells. IV. Microfilament distribution and cell shape in untransformed, transformed, and revertant Balb-c 3T3 cells. J Cell Biol. 1973 Feb;56(2):412–428. doi: 10.1083/jcb.56.2.412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McNutt N. S., Culp L. A., Black P. H. Contact-inhibited revertant cell lines isolated from SV40-transformed cells. II. Ultrastructural study. J Cell Biol. 1971 Sep;50(3):691–708. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.3.691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nicolson G. L., Smith J. R., Poste G. Effects of local anesthetics on cell morphology and membrane-associated cytoskeletal organization in BALB/3T3 cells. J Cell Biol. 1976 Feb;68(2):395–402. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.2.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Noonan K. D. Role of serum in protease-induced stimulation of 3T3 cell division past the monolayer stage. Nature. 1976 Feb 19;259(5544):573–576. doi: 10.1038/259573a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pearlstein E., Hynes R. O., Franks L. M., Hemmings V. J. Surface proteins and fibrinolytic activity of cultured mammalian cells. Cancer Res. 1976 Apr;36(4):1475–1480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pollack R., Osborn M., Weber K. Patterns of organization of actin and myosin in normal and transformed cultured cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Mar;72(3):994–998. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.3.994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. RODRIGUEZ J., DEINHARDT F. Preparation of a semipermanent mounting medium for fluorescent antibody studies. Virology. 1960 Oct;12:316–317. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(60)90205-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Revel J. P., Hoch P., Ho D. Adhesion of culture cells to their substratum. Exp Cell Res. 1974 Mar 15;84(1):207–218. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90398-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Robbins P. W., Wickus G. G., Branton P. E., Gaffney B. J., Hirschberg C. B., Fuchs P., Blumberg P. The chick fibroblast cell surface after transformation by Rous sarcoma virus. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1975;39(Pt 2):1173–1180. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.039.01.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Singer S. J., Nicolson G. L. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science. 1972 Feb 18;175(4023):720–731. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4023.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Vaheri A., Ruoslahti E. Disappearance of a major cell-type specific surface glycoprotein antigen (SF) after transformation of fibroblasts by Rous sarcoma virus. Int J Cancer. 1974 May 15;13(5):579–586. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910130502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wartiovaara J., Linder E., Ruoslahti E., Vaheri A. Distribution of fibroblast surface antigen: association with fibrillar structures of normal cells and loss upon viral transformation. J Exp Med. 1974 Dec 1;140(6):1522–1533. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.6.1522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Weber K., Lazarides E., Goldman R. D., Vogel A., Pollack R. Localization and distribution of actin fibers in normal transformed and revertant cells. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1975;39(Pt 1):363–369. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.039.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Willingham M. C., Yamada K. M., Yamada S. S., Pouysségur J., Pastan I. Microfilament bundles and cell shape are related to adhesiveness to substratum and are dissociable from growth control in cultured fibroblasts. Cell. 1977 Mar;10(3):375–380. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yamada K. M., Ohanian S. H., Pastan I. Cell surface protein decreases microvilli and ruffles on transformed mouse and chick cells. Cell. 1976 Oct;9(2):241–245. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90115-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yamada K. M., Yamada S. S., Pastan I. Cell surface protein partially restores morphology, adhesiveness, and contact inhibition of movement to transformed fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Apr;73(4):1217–1221. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.4.1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zetter B. R., Chen L. B., Buchanan J. M. Effects of protease treatment on growth, morphology, adhesion, and cell surface proteins of secondary chick embryo fibroblasts. Cell. 1976 Mar;7(3):407–412. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90170-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES