Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1975 Dec 1;67(3):538–550. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.3.538

Study on the reinitiation of transcription in 37 RC cells after actinomycin D inhibition. Spectrum of major RNA species resynthesized after maximal suppression by the drug

PMCID: PMC2111666  PMID: 811670

Abstract

The reinitiation of the synthesis of major RNA species has been studied in 37 RC cells after maximal inhibition of RNA synthesis by actinomycin D (AMD). During the period of recovery from AMD, resynthesized RNA (rec- RNA) is initially composed of almost exclusively light (4-14S) heterogeneous RNA species. All normal species of RNA can be detected in the rec-RNA spectrum as early as 3 h after AMD removal. The synthesis of low molecular weight methylated RNA species increases slightly during the early period after AMD removal, while the increase of low molecular weight unmethylated species is more significant during the same period. Much of the radioactivity in the polyribosomal fraction is EDTA and puromycin sensitive. Since polysomal, puromycin-sensitive RNA is polyadenylated (as evidenced by the binding of poly-U filters), and is heterogenous in size, it belongs to the m-RNA class. The synthesis of m-RNA increases immediately after AMD removal, whereas the reinitiation of the r-RNA synthesis occurs after a lag period of about 2 h. The kinetics of recovery of the synthesis of major RNA species from AMD inhibition show a size dependency comparable to the size- related sensitivity to AMD inhibition in other cellular systems. This dependency is most clearly seen in HnRNA, the AMD sensitivity of which is measured by the length of the lag period between AMD removal and the appearance of HnRNA fractions in a sucrose density gradient. Low molecular weight HnRNA reappears first, whereas heavier fractions of HnRNA appear in the spectrum after a lag period, the length of which is in direct relation to the position of the HnRNA fraction in the gradient.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (872.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benedetto A., Cassone A. Inhibition of uridine transport in cultured mammalian cells by theophylline. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1974 Apr 27;349(1):53–60. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(74)90008-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benedetto A., Djaczenko W. 37RC cells rapidly recover their RNA synthesis after inhibition with high doses of actinomycin D. J Cell Biol. 1972 Jan;52(1):171–174. doi: 10.1083/jcb.52.1.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bleyman M., Woese C. "Transcriptional mapping". I. Introduction to the method and the use of actinomycin D as a transcriptional mapping agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Jun;63(2):532–539. doi: 10.1073/pnas.63.2.532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Darnell J. E., Jelinek W. R., Molloy G. R. Biogenesis of mRNA: genetic regulation in mammalian cells. Science. 1973 Sep 28;181(4106):1215–1221. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4106.1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Firtel R. A., Lodish H. F. A small nuclear precursor of messenger RNA in the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. J Mol Biol. 1973 Sep 15;79(2):295–314. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldstein E. S., Penman S. Regulation of protein synthesis in mammalian cells. V. Further studies on the effect of actinomycin D on translation control in HeLa cells. J Mol Biol. 1973 Oct 25;80(2):243–254. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90170-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Perry R. P., Kelley D. E. Inhibition of RNA synthesis by actinomycin D: characteristic dose-response of different RNA species. J Cell Physiol. 1970 Oct;76(2):127–139. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040760202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Perry R. P., Kelley D. E. Persistent synthesis of 5S RNA when production of 28S and 18S ribosomal RNA is inhibited by low doses of actinomycin D. J Cell Physiol. 1968 Dec;72(3):235–246. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040720311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. REICH E., FRANKLIN R. M., SHATKIN A. J., TATUM E. L. Effect of actinomycin D on cellular nucleic acid synthesis and virus production. Science. 1961 Aug 25;134(3478):556–557. doi: 10.1126/science.134.3478.556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Roberts W. K., Newman J. F. Use of low concentrations of actinomycin D in the study of RNA synthesis in Ehrlich ascites cells. J Mol Biol. 1966 Sep;20(1):63–73. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(66)90117-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. SCHERRER K., DARNELL J. E. Sedimentation characteristics of rapidly labelled RNA from HeLa cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1962 Jun 4;7:486–490. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(62)90341-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sawicki S. G., Godman G. C. On the differential cytotoxicity of actinomycin D. J Cell Biol. 1971 Sep;50(3):746–761. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.3.746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schluederberg A., Hendel R. C., Chavanich S. Actinomycin D; renewed RNA synthesis after removal from mammalian cells. Science. 1971 May 7;172(3983):577–579. doi: 10.1126/science.172.3983.577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schwochau M. E., Hadwiger L. A. Regulation of gene expression by actinomycin D and other compounds which change the conformation of DNA. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1969 Oct;134(1):34–41. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(69)90247-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sheldon R., Jurale C., Kates J. Detection of polyadenylic acid sequences in viral and eukaryotic RNA(polu(U)-cellulose columns-poly(U) filters-fiberglass-HeLa cells-bacteriophage T4). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Feb;69(2):417–421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.2.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Singer R. H., Penman S. Messenger RNA in HeLa cells: kinetics of formation and decay. J Mol Biol. 1973 Aug 5;78(2):321–334. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90119-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Williams J. G., Macpherson I. A. The differential effect of actinomycin D in normal and virus-transformed cells. J Cell Biol. 1973 Apr;57(1):148–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.1.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Williams J. G., Macpherson I. A. The uptake of actinomycin D by normal and virus transformed BHK 21 hamster cells. Exp Cell Res. 1975 Mar 15;91(2):237–246. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(75)90100-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES