Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1981 Feb 1;88(2):373–379. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.2.373

Heterogeneous binding of high mobility group chromosomal proteins to nuclei

JS Gordon, J Bruno, JJ Lucas
PMCID: PMC2111745  PMID: 7204499

Abstract

A dramatic difference is observed in the intracellular distribution of the high mobility group (HMG) proteins when chicken embryo fibroblasts are fractionated into nucleus and cytoplasm by either mass enucleation of cytochalasin-B-treated cells or by differential centrifugation of mechanically disrupted cells. Nuclei (karyoplasts) obtained by cytochalasin B treatment of cells contain more than 90 percent of the HMG 1, while enucleated cytoplasts contain the remainder. A similar distribution between karyoplasts and cytoplasts is observed for the H1 histones and the nucleosomal core histones as anticipated. The presence of these proteins, in low amounts, in the cytoplast preparation can be accounted for by the small percentage of unenucleated cells present. In contrast, the nuclei isolated from mechanically disrupted cells contain only 30-40 percent of the total HMGs 1 and 2, the remainder being recovered in the cytosol fraction. No histone is observed in the cytosol fraction. Unike the higher molecular weight HMGs, most of the HMGs 14 and 17 sediment with the nuclei after cell lysis by mechanical disruption. The distribution of HMGs is unaffected by incubating cells with cytochalasin B and mechanically fractionating rather than enucleating them. Therefore, the dramatic difference in HMG 1 distribution observed using the two fractionation techniques cannot be explained by a cytochalasin-B-induced redistribution. On reextraction and sedimentation of isolated nuclei obtained by mechanical cell disruption, only 8 percent of the HMG 1 is released to the supernate. Thus, the majority of the HMG 1 originally isolated with these nuclei, representing 35 percent of the total HMG 1, is stably bound, as is all the HMGs 14 and 17. The remaining 65 percent of the HMGs 1 and 2 is unstably bound and leaks to the cytosol fraction under the conditions of mechanical disruption. It is suggested that the unstably bound HMGs form a protein pool capable of equilibrating between cytoplasm and stably bound HMGs.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (698.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bustin M., Hopkins R. B., Isenberg I. Immunological relatedness of high mobility group chromosomal proteins from calf thymus. J Biol Chem. 1978 Mar 10;253(5):1694–1699. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bustin M., Neihart N. K. Antibodies against chromosomal HMG proteins stain the cytoplasm of mammalian cells. Cell. 1979 Jan;16(1):181–189. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Comings D. E., Harris D. C. Nuclear proteins. II. Similarity of nonhistone proteins in nuclear sap and chromatin, and essential absence of contractile proteins from mouse liver nuclei. J Cell Biol. 1976 Aug;70(2 Pt 1):440–452. doi: 10.1083/jcb.70.2.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Garel A., Axel R. Selective digestion of transcriptionally active ovalbumin genes from oviduct nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Nov;73(11):3966–3970. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.11.3966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Garrard W. T., Pearson W. R., Wake S. K., Bonner J. Stoichiometry of chromatin proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1974 May 7;58(1):50–57. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(74)90889-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodwin G. H., Walker J. M., Johns E. W. Studies on the degradation of high mobility group non-histone chromosomal proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Jun 22;519(1):233–242. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(78)90076-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gordon J. S., Rosenfeld B. I., Kaufman R., Williams D. L. Evidence for a quantitative tissue-specific distribution of high mobility group chromosomal proteins. Biochemistry. 1980 Sep 16;19(19):4395–4402. doi: 10.1021/bi00560a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herrick G., Spear B. B., Veomett G. Intracellular localization of mouse DNA polymerase-alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Apr;73(4):1136–1139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.4.1136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Javaherian K., Amini S. Conformational study of calf thymus HMG14 nonhistone protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Dec 29;85(4):1385–1391. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(78)91157-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Javaherian K., Amini S. Physicochemical studies of non-histone protein HMG17 with DNA. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Oct 4;478(3):295–304. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(77)90147-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Javaherian K., Liu J. F., Wang J. C. Nonhistone proteins HMG1 and HMG2 change the DNA helical structure. Science. 1978 Mar 24;199(4335):1345–1346. doi: 10.1126/science.628842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KISSANE J. M., ROBINS E. The fluorometric measurement of deoxyribonucleic acid in animal tissues with special reference to the central nervous system. J Biol Chem. 1958 Jul;233(1):184–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kuehl L. Isolation of skeletal muscle nuclei. Exp Cell Res. 1975 Mar 15;91(2):441–448. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(75)90125-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Levy W B., Wong N. C., Dixon G. H. Selective association of the trout-specific H6 protein with chromatin regions susceptible to DNase I and DNase II: possible location of HMG-T in the spacer region between core nucleosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jul;74(7):2810–2814. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.7.2810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Levy-Wilson B., Dixon G. H. Limited action of micrococcal nuclease on trout testis nuclei generates two mononucleosome subsets enriched in transcribed DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Apr;76(4):1682–1686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.4.1682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Levy B. W., Connor W., Dixon G. H. A subset of trout testis nucleosomes enriched in transcribed DNA sequences contains high mobility group proteins as major structural components. J Biol Chem. 1979 Feb 10;254(3):609–620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Levy B., Dixon G. H. Renaturation kinetics of cDNA complementary to cytoplamic polyadenylated RNA from rainbow trout testis. Accessibility of transcribed genes to pancreatic DNase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977 Apr;4(4):883–898. doi: 10.1093/nar/4.4.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lipsich L. A., Lucas J. J., Kates J. R. Cell cycle dependence of the reactivation of chick erythrocyte nuclei after transplantation into mouse L929 cell cytoplasts. J Cell Physiol. 1978 Nov;97(2):199–207. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040970209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lucas J. J., Kates J. R. The construction of viable nuclear-cytoplasmic hybrid cells by nuclear transplantation. Cell. 1976 Mar;7(3):397–405. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90169-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lucas J. J., Szekely E., Kates J. R. The regeneration and division of mouse L-cell karyoplasts. Cell. 1976 Jan;7(1):115–122. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90261-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mardian J. K., Paton A. E., Bunick G. J., Olins D. E. Nucleosome cores have two specific binding sites for nonhistone chromosomal proteins HMG 14 and HMG 17. Science. 1980 Sep 26;209(4464):1534–1536. doi: 10.1126/science.7433974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Panyim S., Bilek D., Chalkley R. An electrophoretic comparison of vertebrate histones. J Biol Chem. 1971 Jul 10;246(13):4206–4215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Peterson J. L., McConkey E. H. Non-histone chromosomal proteins from HeLa cells. A survey by high resolution, two-dimensional electrophoresis. J Biol Chem. 1976 Jan 25;251(2):548–554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Prescott D. M., Myerson D., Wallace J. Enucleation of mammalian cells with cytochalasin B. Exp Cell Res. 1972;71(2):480–485. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90322-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rechsteiner M., Kuehl L. Microinjection of the nonhistone chromosomal protein HMG1 into bovine fibroblasts and HeLa cells. Cell. 1979 Apr;16(4):901–908. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90105-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Roeder R. G., Rutter W. J. Specific nucleolar and nucleoplasmic RNA polymerases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Mar;65(3):675–682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.65.3.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. SANTOIANNI P., AYALA M. FLUOROMETRIC ULTRAMICROANALYSIS OF DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID IN HUMAN SKIN. J Invest Dermatol. 1965 Aug;45:99–103. doi: 10.1038/jid.1965.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith B. J., Robertson D., Birbeck M. S., Goodwin G. H., Johns E. W. Immunochemical studies of high mobility group non-histone chromatin proteins HMG 1 and HMG 2. Exp Cell Res. 1978 Sep;115(2):420–423. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(78)90298-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vidali G., Boffa L. C., Allfrey V. G. Selective release of chromosomal proteins during limited DNAase 1 digestion of avian erythrocyte chromatin. Cell. 1977 Oct;12(2):409–415. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90117-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Weintraub H., Groudine M. Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science. 1976 Sep 3;193(4256):848–856. doi: 10.1126/science.948749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Weisbrod S., Groudine M., Weintraub H. Interaction of HMG 14 and 17 with actively transcribed genes. Cell. 1980 Jan;19(1):289–301. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90410-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Weisbrod S., Weintraub H. Isolation of a subclass of nuclear proteins responsible for conferring a DNase I-sensitive structure on globin chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Feb;76(2):630–634. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.2.630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wigle D. T., Dixon G. H. A new histone from trout testis. J Biol Chem. 1971 Sep 25;246(18):5636–5644. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zorn G. A., Lucas J. J., Kates J. R. Purification and characterization of regenerating mouse L929 karyoplasts. Cell. 1979 Nov;18(3):659–672. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90121-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES