Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1981 Jul 1;90(1):55–62. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.1.55

Quantitative analysis of intercellular adhesive specificity in freshly explanted and cultured cells

PMCID: PMC2111821  PMID: 6166626

Abstract

A new method is presented for the quantitative analysis of intercellular adhesive specificity. In this assay, two cell types are mixed, one unlabeled and the other labeled with the fluorescent dye, fluorescamine [4-phenylspiro(feran-2[3H],1'-phthalan)-3,3'-dione]. The resulting aggregates are analyzed by fluorescence microscopy to determine the number of labeled and unlabeled cells per aggregate. Random (nonspecific) aggregation was characterized by a binomial distribution, and adhesive specificity was accordingly quantified by the deviation (as determined by a chi-square test) from the calculated binomial distribution. The labeling procedure was simple and rapid, and experiments with 18 different cell types showed that it did not affect cell viability, morphology, rate and extent of adhesion, plating efficiency, and the capability of myogenic cells to undergo terminal differentiation. Most important, assays with morphologically identifiable cell pairs indicated that the fluorescent label neither induced apparent nor destroyed existing adhesive specificity. The most pronounced adhesive specificities were observed with freshly explanted cells from adult tissues and also with mixtures of simian virus 40- transformed and nontransformed BALB/c 3T3 cells. A glucosamine-6- phosphate N-acetylase-deficient mutant 3T3 line (AD6), however, aggregated randomly with parental 3T3 cells. Lectin-resistant mutant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells displayed marginal adhesive specificity when mixed with normal CHO cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (947.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Björntorp P., Karlsson M., Pertoft H., Pettersson P., Sjöström L., Smith U. Isolation and characterization of cells from rat adipose tissue developing into adipocytes. J Lipid Res. 1978 Mar;19(3):316–324. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bozzaro S., Gerisch G. Contact sites in aggregating cells of Polysphondylium pallidum. J Mol Biol. 1978 Apr 5;120(2):265–279. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90067-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cifone M. A., Hynes R. O., Baker R. M. Characteristics of concanavalin A-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cells and certain revertants. J Cell Physiol. 1979 Jul;100(1):39–54. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041000105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Conn P. M., Tsuruhara T., Dufau M., Catt K. J. Isolation of highly purified Leydig cells by density gradient centrifugation. Endocrinology. 1977 Aug;101(2):639–642. doi: 10.1210/endo-101-2-639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Curtis A. S. The specific control of cell positioning. Arch Biol (Liege) 1974;85(1):105–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DULBECCO R., FREEMAN G. Plaque production by the polyoma virus. Virology. 1959 Jul;8(3):396–397. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(59)90043-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dorsey J. K., Roth S. Adhesive specificity in normal and transformed mouse fibroblasts. Dev Biol. 1973 Aug;33(2):249–256. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90135-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edelman G. M., Rutishauser U., Millette C. F. Cell fractionation and arrangement on fibers, beads, and surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Sep;68(9):2153–2157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.9.2153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FOLCH J., LEES M., SLOANE STANLEY G. H. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957 May;226(1):497–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Frazier W., Glaser L. Surface components and cell recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 1979;48:491–523. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.48.070179.002423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gershman H., Drumm J., Culp L. Sorting out of normal and virus-transformed cells in cellular aggregates. J Cell Biol. 1976 Feb;68(2):276–286. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.2.276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grady S. R., McGuire E. J. Intercellular adhesive selectivity. III. Species selectivity of embryonic liver intercellular adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1976 Oct;71(1):96–106. doi: 10.1083/jcb.71.1.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hawkes S. P., Meehan T. D., Bissell M. J. The use of fluorescamine as a probe for labeling the outer surface of the plasma membrane. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976 Feb 23;68(4):1226–1233. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(76)90328-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Krag S. S. A concanavalin A-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cell line is deficient in the synthesis of [3H]glucosyl oligosaccharide-lipid. J Biol Chem. 1979 Sep 25;254(18):9167–9177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Loewe H., Urbanietz J. Basisch substituierte 2,6-Bis-benzimidazolderivate, eine neue chemotherapeutisch aktive Körperklasse. Arzneimittelforschung. 1974 Dec;24(12):1927–1933. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marchase R. B., Vosbeck K., Roth S. Intercellular adhesive specificity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Dec 14;457(3-4):385–416. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(76)90005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Neufeld E. J., Pastan I. A mutant fibroblast cell line defective in glycoprotein synthesis due to a deficiency of glucosamine phosphate acetyltransferase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1978 Jun;188(2):323–327. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9861(78)80016-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Obrink B., Kuhlenschmidt M. S., Roseman S. Adhesive specificity of juvenile rat and chicken liver cells and membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Mar;74(3):1077–1081. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.3.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pouysségur J. M., Pastan I. Mutants of Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts defective in adhesiveness to substratum: evidence for alteration in cell surface proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Feb;73(2):544–548. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.2.544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pouysségur J., Pastan I. Mutants of mouse fibroblasts altered in the synthesis of cell surface glycoproteins. Preliminary evidence for a defect in the acetylation of glucosamine 6-phosphate. J Biol Chem. 1977 Mar 10;252(5):1639–1646. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pouysségur J., Willingham M., Pastan I. Role of cell surface carbohydrates and proteins in cell behavior: studies on the biochemical reversion of an N-acetylglucosamine-deficient fibroblast mutant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jan;74(1):243–247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.1.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Roseman S. The synthesis of complex carbohydrates by multiglycosyltransferase systems and their potential function in intercellular adhesion. Chem Phys Lipids. 1970 Oct;5(1):270–297. doi: 10.1016/0009-3084(70)90024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Roth S., McGuire E. J., Roseman S. An assay for intercellular adhesive specificity. J Cell Biol. 1971 Nov;51(21):525–535. doi: 10.1083/jcb.51.2.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rothblat G. H., DeMartinis F. D. Release of lipoprotein lipase from rat adipose tissue cells grown in culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1977 Sep 9;78(1):45–50. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(77)91219-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. STEINBERG M. S. Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Some morphogenetic tissue movements and the sorting out of embryonic cells may have a common explanation. Science. 1963 Aug 2;141(3579):401–408. doi: 10.1126/science.141.3579.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Seglen P. O. Preparation of isolated rat liver cells. Methods Cell Biol. 1976;13:29–83. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61797-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sims P. J., Waggoner A. S., Wang C. H., Hoffman J. F. Studies on the mechanism by which cyanine dyes measure membrane potential in red blood cells and phosphatidylcholine vesicles. Biochemistry. 1974 Jul 30;13(16):3315–3330. doi: 10.1021/bi00713a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Springer W. R., Barondes S. H. Direct measurement of species-specific cohesion in cellular slime molds. J Cell Biol. 1978 Sep;78(3):937–942. doi: 10.1083/jcb.78.3.937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stanley P., Caillibot V., Siminovitch L. Selection and characterization of eight phenotypically distinct lines of lectin-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cell. Cell. 1975 Oct;6(2):121–128. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(75)90002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stanners C. P., Eliceiri G. L., Green H. Two types of ribosome in mouse-hamster hybrid cells. Nat New Biol. 1971 Mar 10;230(10):52–54. doi: 10.1038/newbio230052a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Steinberg M. S., Armstrong P. B., Granger R. E. On the recovery of adhesiveness by trypsin-dissociated cells. J Membr Biol. 1973;13(2):97–128. doi: 10.1007/BF01868223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Takeichi M., Ozaki H. S., Tokunaga K., Okada T. S. Experimental manipulation of cell surface to affect cellular recognition mechanisms. Dev Biol. 1979 May;70(1):195–205. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(79)90016-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Turner D. C. Differentiation in cultures derived from embryonic chicken muscle: the postmitotic, fusion-capable myoblast as a distinct cell type. Differentiation. 1978 Mar 13;10(2):81–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1978.tb00949.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Udenfriend S., Stein S., Böhlen P., Dairman W., Leimgruber W., Weigele M. Fluorescamine: a reagent for assay of amino acids, peptides, proteins, and primary amines in the picomole range. Science. 1972 Nov 24;178(4063):871–872. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4063.871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Umbreit J., Roseman S. A requirement for reversible binding between aggregating embryonic cells before stable adhesion. J Biol Chem. 1975 Dec 25;250(24):9360–9368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Van R. L., Bayliss C. E., Roncari D. A. Cytological and enzymological characterization of adult human adipocyte precursors in culture. J Clin Invest. 1976 Sep;58(3):699–704. doi: 10.1172/JCI108516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vosbeck K., Roth S. Assay of intercellular adhesiveness using cell-coated Sephadex beads as collecting particles. J Cell Sci. 1976 Dec;22(3):657–670. doi: 10.1242/jcs.22.3.657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Walther B. T., Ohman R., Roseman S. A quantitative assay for intercellular adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 May;70(5):1569–1573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.5.1569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Weber K., Rathke P. C., Osborn M. Cytoplasmic microtubular images in glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue culture cells by electron microscopy and by immunofluorescence microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Apr;75(4):1820–1824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.4.1820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES