Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1982 Mar 1;92(3):616–621. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.3.616

Studies of the mechanism of the electrical polyspermy block using voltage clamp during cross-species fertilization

PMCID: PMC2112040  PMID: 7085751

Abstract

Prevention of polyspermic fertilization in sea urchins (Jaffe, 1976, Nature (Lond.). 261:68-71) and the worm Urechis (Gould-Somero, Jaffe, and Holland, 1979, J. Cell Biol. 82:426-440) involves an electrically mediated fast block. The fertilizing sperm causes a positive shift in the egg's membrane potential; this fertilization potential prevents additional sperm entries. Since in Urechis the egg membrane potential required to prevent fertilization is more positive than in the sea urchin, we tested whether in a cross-species fertilization the blocking voltage is determined by the species of the egg or by the species of the sperm. With some sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) females, greater than or equal to 90% of the eggs were fertilized by Urechis sperm; a fertilization potential occurred, the fertilization envelope elevated, and sometimes decondensing Urechis sperm nuclei were found in the egg cytoplasm. After insemination of sea urchin eggs with Urechis sperm during voltage clamp at +50 mV, fertilization (fertilization envelope elevation) occurred in only nine of twenty trials, whereas, at +20 mV, fertilization occurred in ten of ten trials. With the same concentration of sea urchin sperm, fertilization of sea urchin eggs occurred, in only two of ten trials at +20 mV. These results indicate that the blocking voltage for fertilization in these crosses is determined by the sperm species, consistent with the hypothesis that the fertilization potential may block the translocation within the egg membrane of a positively charged component of the sperm.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (787.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blumenthal R., Klausner R. D., Weinstein J. N. Voltage-dependent translocation of the asialoglycoprotein receptor across lipid membranes. Nature. 1980 Nov 27;288(5789):333–338. doi: 10.1038/288333a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chambers E. L., Pressman B. C., Rose B. The activation of sea urchin eggs by the divalent ionophores A23187 and X-537A. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1974 Sep 9;60(1):126–132. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(74)90181-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cross N. L., Elinson R. P. A fast block to polyspermy in frogs mediated by changes in the membrane potential. Dev Biol. 1980 Mar;75(1):187–198. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90154-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Donovan J. J., Simon M. I., Draper R. K., Montal M. Diphtheria toxin forms transmembrane channels in planar lipid bilayers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):172–176. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Epel D., Weaver A. M., Mazia D. Methods for revoval of the vitelline membrane of sea urchin eggs. I. Use of dithiothreitol (Cleland Reagent). Exp Cell Res. 1970 Jul;61(1):64–68. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90257-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gould-Somero M., Holland L. Fine structural investigation of the insemination response in Urechis caupo. Dev Biol. 1975 Oct;46(2):358–369. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(75)90112-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gould-Somero M., Holland L., Paul M. Cytochalasin B inhibits sperm penetration into eggs of Urechis caupo (Echiura). Dev Biol. 1977 Jul 1;58(1):11–22. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90071-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gould-Somero M., Jaffe L. A., Holland L. Z. Electrically mediated fast polyspermy block in eggs of the marine worm, Urechis caupo. J Cell Biol. 1979 Aug;82(2):426–440. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.2.426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jaffe L. A. Fast block to polyspermy in sea urchin eggs is electrically mediated. Nature. 1976 May 6;261(5555):68–71. doi: 10.1038/261068a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jaffe L. A., Gould-Somero M., Holland L. Ionic mechanism of the fertilization potential of the marine worm, Urechis caupo (Echiura). J Gen Physiol. 1979 Apr;73(4):469–492. doi: 10.1085/jgp.73.4.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jaffe L. A., Hagiwara S., Kado R. T. The time course of cortical vesicle fusion in sea urchin eggs observed as membrane capacitance changes. Dev Biol. 1978 Nov;67(1):243–248. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(78)90314-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jaffe L. A., Robinson K. R. Membrane potential of the unfertilized sea urchin egg. Dev Biol. 1978 Jan;62(1):215–228. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(78)90103-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Longo F. J. An ultrastructural study of cross-fertilization (Arbacia female x Mytilus male). J Cell Biol. 1977 Apr;73(1):14–26. doi: 10.1083/jcb.73.1.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Miyazaki S., Hirai S. Fast polyspermy block and activation potential. Correlated changes during oocyte maturation of a starfish. Dev Biol. 1979 Jun;70(2):327–340. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(79)90031-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Paul M., Gould-Somero M. Evidence for a polyspermy block at the level of sperm-egg plasma membrane fusion in Urechis caupo. J Exp Zool. 1976 Apr;196(1):105–112. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401960110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Steinhardt R. A., Epel D. Activation of sea-urchin eggs by a calcium ionophore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 May;71(5):1915–1919. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.5.1915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Steinhardt R. A., Lundin L., Mazia D. Bioelectric responses of the echinoderm egg to fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Oct;68(10):2426–2430. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.10.2426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES