Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1982 Apr 1;93(1):33–48. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.1.33

Functional autonomy of monopolar spindle and evidence for oscillatory movement in mitosis

PMCID: PMC2112119  PMID: 7068758

Abstract

The oscillations of chromosomes associated with a single spindle pole in monocentric and bipolar spindles were analysed by time-lapse cinematography in mitosis of primary cultures of lung epithelium from the newt Taricha granulosa. Chromosomes oscillate toward and away from the pole in all stages of mitosis including anaphase. The duration, velocity, and amplitude of such oscillations are the same in all stages of mitosis. The movement away from the pole in monocentric spindle is rapid enough to suggest the existence of a previously unrecognized active component in chromosome movement, presumably resulting from a pushing action of the kinetochore fiber. During prometaphase oscillations, chromosomes may approach the pole even more closely than at the end of anaphase. Together, these observations demonstrate that a monopolar spindle is sufficient to generate the forces for chromosome transport, both toward and away from the pole. The coordination of the aster/centrosome migration in prophase with the development of the kinetochore fibers determines the course of mitosis. After the breaking of the nuclear envelope in normal mitosis, aster/centrosome separation is normally followed by the rapid formation of bipolar chromosomal fibers. There are two aberrant extremes that may result from a failure in coordination between these processes: (a) A monocentric spindle will arise when aster separation does not occur, and (b) an anaphaselike prometaphase will result if the aster/centrosomal complexes are already well-separated and bipolar chromosomal fibers do not form. In the latter case, the two monopolar prometaphase half-spindles migrate apart, each containing a random number of two chromatid (metaphase) monopolar-oriented chromosomes. This random segregation of prometaphase chromosome displays many features of a standard anaphase and may be followed by a false cleavage. The process of polar separation during prometaphase occurs without any visible interzonal structures. Aster/centrosomes and monopolar spindles migrate autonomously by an unknown mechanism. There are, however, firm but transitory connections between the aster center and the kinetochores as demonstrated by the occasional synchrony of centrosome-kinetochore movement. The data suggest that aster motility is important in the progress of both prometaphase and anaphase in normal mitosis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albrecht-Buehler G. Does the geometric design of centrioles imply their function? Cell Motil. 1981;1(2):237–245. doi: 10.1002/cm.970010206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aubin J. E., Osborn M., Weber K. Variations in the distribution and migration of centriole duplexes in mitotic PtK2 cells studied by immunofluorescence microscopy. J Cell Sci. 1980 Jun;43:177–194. doi: 10.1242/jcs.43.1.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bajer A. S., Molè-Bajer J. Asters, poles, and transport properties within spindlelike microtubule arrays. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1982;46(Pt 1):263–283. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1982.046.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenner S., Branch A., Meredith S., Berns M. W. The absence of centrioles from spindle poles of rat kangaroo (PtK2) cells undergoing meiotic-like reduction division in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1977 Feb;72(2):368–379. doi: 10.1083/jcb.72.2.368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Inoué S., Fuseler J., Salmon E. D., Ellis G. W. Functional organization of mitotic microtubules. Physical chemistry of the in vivo equilibrium system. Biophys J. 1975 Jul;15(7):725–744. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(75)85850-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Inoué S., Sato H. Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):259–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kubai D. F. The evolution of the mitotic spindle. Int Rev Cytol. 1975;43:167–227. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60069-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LEIBOVITZ A. THE GROWTH AND MAINTENANCE OF TISSUE-CELL CULTURES IN FREE GAS EXCHANGE WITH THE ATMOSPHERE. Am J Hyg. 1963 Sep;78:173–180. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LaFountain J. R., Jr Spindle shape changes as an indicator of force production in crane-fly spermatocytes. J Cell Sci. 1972 Jan;10(1):79–93. doi: 10.1242/jcs.10.1.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Margolis R. L., Wilson L., Keifer B. I. Mitotic mechanism based on intrinsic microtubule behaviour. Nature. 1978 Mar 30;272(5652):450–452. doi: 10.1038/272450a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mazia D., Paweletz N., Sluder G., Finze E. M. Cooperation of kinetochores and pole in the establishment of monopolar mitotic apparatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):377–381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nicklas R. B. Mitosis. Adv Cell Biol. 1971;2:225–297. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9588-5_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Paweletz N., Mazia D. Fine structure of the mitotic cycle of unfertilized sea urchin eggs activated by ammoniacal sea water. Eur J Cell Biol. 1979 Oct;20(1):37–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Petzelt C. Biochemistry of the mitotic spindle. Int Rev Cytol. 1979;60:53–92. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61259-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. ROSE G. G., POMERAT C. M., SHINDLER T. O., TRUNNELL J. B. A cellophane-strip technique for culturing tissue in multipurpose culture chambers. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1958 Nov 25;4(6):761–764. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.6.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rao P. N., Engelberg J. Mitotic non-disjunction of sister chromatids and anomalous mitosis induced by low temperatures in HeLa cells. Exp Cell Res. 1966 Sep;43(2):332–342. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(66)90060-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rattner J. B., Berns M. W. Distribution of microtubules during centriole separation in rat kangaroo (Potorous) cells. Cytobios. 1976;15(57):37–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Roos U. P. Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis. III. Patterns of chromosome behavior during prometaphase. Chromosoma. 1976 Mar 10;54(4):363–385. doi: 10.1007/BF00292816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Salmon E. D. Spindle microtubules: thermodynamics of in vivo assembly and role in chromosome movement. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;253:383–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb19216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sentein P. Nocodazole, an antitubulin substance, whose action is different from that of colchicine. Effects on segmentation mitoses. I.--Light microscopy. Arch Biol (Liege) 1979;90(4):459–479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Seto T., Kezer J., Pomerat C. M. A cinematographic study of meiosis in salamander spermatocytes in vitro. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1969;94(3):407–424. doi: 10.1007/BF00319185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tippit D. H., Pickett-Heaps J. D., Leslie R. Cell division in two large pennate diatoms Hantzschia and Nitzschia III. A new proposal for kinetochore function during prometaphase. J Cell Biol. 1980 Aug;86(2):402–416. doi: 10.1083/jcb.86.2.402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. URETZ R. B., BLOOM W., ZIRKLE R. E. Irradiation of parts of individual cells. II. Effects of an ultraviolet microbeam focused on parts of chromosomes. Science. 1954 Aug 6;120(3110):197–199. doi: 10.1126/science.120.3110.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wolf R. The cytaster, a colchicine-sensitive migration organelle of cleavage nuclei in an insect egg. Dev Biol. 1978 Feb;62(2):464–472. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(78)90228-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. ZIRKLE R. E. Partial-cell irradiation. Adv Biol Med Phys. 1957;5:103–146. doi: 10.1016/b978-1-4832-3111-2.50007-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zirkle R. E. Ultraviolet-microbeam irradiation of newt-cell cytoplasm: spindle destruction, false anaphase, and delay of true anaphase. Radiat Res. 1970 Mar;41(3):516–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES