Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1982 Jun 1;93(3):812–819. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.3.812

Acrosomal reaction of thyone sperm. I. Changes in the sperm head visualized by high resolution video microscopy

PMCID: PMC2112130  PMID: 6811599

Abstract

Structural changes inside the head of Thyone sperm undergoing the acrosomal reaction were followed with a high-resolution, differential interference contrast (DIC) video microscope. The beating sperm, adhering by their midpiece to the cover slip of a wedge perfusion chamber, were activated by a calcium ionophore (20 microM A23187) suspended in sea water containing 50 mM excess CaCl2. Before activation of the sperm, the acrosomal region appears as a 1.1-microM diameter sphere, slightly less dense than the rest of the sperm head. Upon activation, the acrosome pops; the acrosomal region suddenly swells and its refractive index drops. After approximately 1 s, a crescent-shaped periacrosomal cup appears behind the acrosomal vacuole. In the next several seconds, the cup loses more refractive index and expands forward as the acrosomal process extends. The acrosomal vacuole becomes smaller, but without appreciable drop in refractive index. These observations, coupled with the behavior of the extending acrosomal process reported in the companion paper, and in electron microscopy (EM) and early physiological studies, suggest that the acrosomal process is extended by a combination of the explosive polymerization of actin and the osmotic swelling of the periacrosomal cup material. In this paper, we also consider the meaning of the enhanced DIC image seen in the high-resolution video microscope, and discuss the reliability of measurements on small linear dimensions made with the DIC microscope.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AFZELIUS B. A., MURRAY A. The acrosomal reaction of spermatozoa during fertilization or treatment with egg water. Exp Cell Res. 1957 Apr;12(2):325–337. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(57)90146-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen R. D., Allen N. S., Travis J. L. Video-enhanced contrast, differential interference contrast (AVEC-DIC) microscopy: a new method capable of analyzing microtubule-related motility in the reticulopodial network of Allogromia laticollaris. Cell Motil. 1981;1(3):291–302. doi: 10.1002/cm.970010303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen R. D., David G. B., Nomarski G. The zeiss-Nomarski differential interference equipment for transmitted-light microscopy. Z Wiss Mikrosk. 1969 Nov;69(4):193–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. COLWIN L. H., COLWIN A. L. Changes in the spermatozoon during fertilization in Hydroides hexagonus (Annelida). I. Passage of the acrosomal region through the vitelline membrane. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Jun;10:231–254. doi: 10.1083/jcb.10.2.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DAN J., OHORI Y., KUSHIDA H. STUDIES ON THE ACROSOME. VII. FORMATION OF THE ACROSOMAL PROCESS IN SEA URCHIN SPERMATOZOA. J Ultrastruct Res. 1964 Dec;11:508–524. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(64)80079-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DAVIES H. G. The determination of mass and concentration by microscope in interferometry. Gen Cytochem Methods. 1958;1:55–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dan J. C., Hagiwara Y. Studies on the acrosome. IX. Course of acrosome reaction in the starfish. J Ultrastruct Res. 1967 Jun;18(5):562–579. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(67)80203-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dan J. C., Kakizawa Y., Kushida H., Fukita K. Acrosomal triggers. Exp Cell Res. 1972 May;72(1):60–68. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90567-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fuseler J. W. Mitosis in Tilia americana endosperm. J Cell Biol. 1975 Jan;64(1):159–171. doi: 10.1083/jcb.64.1.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Inoué S., Borisy G. G., Kiehart D. P. Growth and lability of Chaetopterus oocyte mitotic spindles isolated in the presence of porcine brain tubulin. J Cell Biol. 1974 Jul;62(1):175–184. doi: 10.1083/jcb.62.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Inoué S. Video image processing greatly enhances contrast, quality, and speed in polarization-based microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1981 May;89(2):346–356. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.2.346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moy G. W., Vacquier V. D. Immunoperoxidase localization of bindin during the adhesion of sperm to sea urchin eggs. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1979;13(Pt 1):31–44. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60688-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Padawer J. The Nomarski interference-contrast microscope. An experimental basis for image interpretation. J R Microsc Soc. 1968;88(3):305–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1968.tb00616.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tilney L. G. Actin, motility, and membranes. Soc Gen Physiol Ser. 1979;33:163–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tilney L. G., Inoué S. Acrosomal reaction of Thyone sperm. II. The kinetics and possible mechanism of acrosomal process elongation. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;93(3):820–827. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.3.820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tilney L. G., Kallenbach N. Polymerization of actin. VI. The polarity of the actin filaments in the acrosomal process and how it might be determined. J Cell Biol. 1979 Jun;81(3):608–623. doi: 10.1083/jcb.81.3.608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tilney L. G. The polymerization of actin. III. Aggregates of nonfilamentous actin and its associated proteins: a storage form of actin. J Cell Biol. 1976 Apr;69(1):73–89. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.1.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES