Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1983 Jan 1;96(1):204–216. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.1.204

Gap junction structures. IV. Asymmetric features revealed by low- irradiation microscopy

PMCID: PMC2112247  PMID: 6186671

Abstract

Micrographs of mouse liver gap junctions, isolated with detergents, and negatively stained with uranyl acetate, have been recorded by low- irradiation methods. Our Fourier-averaged micrographs of the hexagonal junction lattice show skewed, hexameric connexons with less stain at the threefold axis than at the six indentations between the lobes of the connexon image. These substructural features, not clearly observed previously, are acutely sensitive to irradiation. After an electron dose less than that normally used in microscopy, the image is converted to the familiar doughnut shape, with a darkly stained center and a smooth hexagonal outline, oriented with mirror symmetry in the lattice. Differences in appearance among 25 reconstructed images from our low- irradiation micrographs illustrate variation in staining of the connexon channel and the space between connexons. Consistently observed stain concentration at six symmetrically related sites approximately 34 A from the connexon center, 8 degrees to the right or left of the (1, 1) lattice vector may reveal an intrinsic asymmetric feature of the junction structure. The unexpected skewing of the six-lobed connexon image suggests that the pair of hexagonal membrane arrays that form the junction may not be structurally identical. Because the projected image of the connexon pair itself appears mirror symmetric, each pair may consist of two identical connexon hexamers related by local (noncrystallographic) twofold axes in the junctional plane at the middle of the gap. All connexons may be chemically identical, but their packing in the hexagonal arrays on the two sides of the junction appears to be nonequivalent.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker T. S., Amos L. A. Structure of the tubulin dimer in zinc-induced sheets. J Mol Biol. 1978 Jul 25;123(1):89–106. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90378-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett M. V., Goodenough D. A. Gap junctions, electrotonic coupling, and intercellular communication. Neurosci Res Program Bull. 1978 Sep;16(3):1–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dubochet J. High resolution dark-field electron microscopy. J Microsc. 1973 Aug;98(3):334–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1973.tb03837.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fallon R. F., Goodenough D. A. Five-hour half-life of mouse liver gap-junction protein. J Cell Biol. 1981 Aug;90(2):521–526. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.2.521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Finch J. T., Klug A. The structure of viruses of the papilloma-polyoma type 3. Structure of rabbit papilloma virus, with an appendix on the topography of contrast in negative-staining for electron-microscopy. J Mol Biol. 1965 Aug;13(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80075-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Friend D. S., Gilula N. B. Variations in tight and gap junctions in mammalian tissues. J Cell Biol. 1972 Jun;53(3):758–776. doi: 10.1083/jcb.53.3.758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodenough D. A., Revel J. P. A fine structural analysis of intercellular junctions in the mouse liver. J Cell Biol. 1970 May;45(2):272–290. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.2.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Henderson D., Eibl H., Weber K. Structure and biochemistry of mouse hepatic gap junctions. J Mol Biol. 1979 Aug 5;132(2):193–218. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90391-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Loewenstein W. R., Kanno Y., Socolar S. J. Quantum jumps of conductance during formation of membrane channels at cell-cell junction. Nature. 1978 Jul 13;274(5667):133–136. doi: 10.1038/274133a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Loewenstein W. R. Permeability of membrane junctions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jul 14;137(2):441–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50175.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Makowski L., Caspar D. L., Goodenough D. A., Phillips W. C. Gap Junction Structures: III. The Effect of Variations in the Isolation Procedure. Biophys J. 1982 Jan;37(1):189–191. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84663-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Makowski L., Caspar D. L., Phillips W. C., Goodenough D. A. Gap junction structures. II. Analysis of the x-ray diffraction data. J Cell Biol. 1977 Aug;74(2):629–645. doi: 10.1083/jcb.74.2.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Merk F. B., Botticelli C. R., Albright J. T. An intercellular response to estrogen by granulosa cells in the rat ovary; an electron microscope study. Endocrinology. 1972 Apr;90(4):992–1007. doi: 10.1210/endo-90-4-992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Moody M. F. Structure of the sheath of bacteriophage T4. I. Structure of the contracted sheath and polysheath. J Mol Biol. 1967 Apr 28;25(2):167–200. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90136-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moody M. F. Structure of the sheath of bacteriophage T4. II. Rearrangement of the sheath subunits during contraction. J Mol Biol. 1967 Apr 28;25(2):201–208. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90137-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nicholson B. J., Hunkapiller M. W., Grim L. B., Hood L. E., Revel J. P. Rat liver gap junction protein: properties and partial sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Dec;78(12):7594–7598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Raviola G., Raviola E. Intercellular junctions in the ciliary epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978 Oct;17(10):958–981. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rayment I., Baker T. S., Caspar D. L., Murakami W. T. Polyoma virus capsid structure at 22.5 A resolution. Nature. 1982 Jan 14;295(5845):110–115. doi: 10.1038/295110a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Salmon E. D., DeRosier D. A surveying optical diffractometer. J Microsc. 1981 Sep;123(Pt 3):239–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1981.tb02468.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Unwin P. N. Electron microscopy of the stacked disk aggregate of tobacco mosaic virus protein. II. The influence of electron irradiation of the stain distribution. J Mol Biol. 1974 Aug 25;87(4):657–670. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90076-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Unwin P. N., Henderson R. Molecular structure determination by electron microscopy of unstained crystalline specimens. J Mol Biol. 1975 May 25;94(3):425–440. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90212-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Unwin P. N., Zampighi G. Structure of the junction between communicating cells. Nature. 1980 Feb 7;283(5747):545–549. doi: 10.1038/283545a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zampighi G., Unwin P. N. Two forms of isolated gap junctions. J Mol Biol. 1979 Dec 5;135(2):451–464. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90446-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES