Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1983 Feb 1;96(2):386–392. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.2.386

Isolation and characterization of the erythroid progenitor cell: CFU-E

PMCID: PMC2112306  PMID: 6833361

Abstract

Erythroid progenitor cells, CFU-E (colony-forming-unit-erythroid), were isolated to practical homogeneity by a combination of three enrichment procedures. CFU-E were generated in large amounts in spleens of mice previously bled and treated with the erythropoiesis-suppressing drug thiamphenicol. The average CFU-E concentration in spleens from mice 4 d after the thiamphenicol-treatment was 10%. These CFU-E were separated from lymphocytes, erythrocytes, and granulocytes and their progenitor cells by centrifugal elutriation and Percoll density gradient centrifugation. A three- to five-fold enrichment was obtained by elutriation, leading to a CFU-E concentration of 45%. With the Percoll gradient another twofold enrichment was achieved, providing us with a 80-100% CFU-E cell population. The overall recovery of CFU-E was 60- 70%. This is a cheap, rapid, and highly efficient method of obtaining large quantities of viable CFU-E. The sequential formation of two-, four-, and eight-cell colonies from CFU-E cultured in vitro was studied. These cells enable us to study the biochemical changes occurring in the differentiation process of an erythroid progenitor cell induced by the hormone erythropoietin. The morphological and some physical and biological properties of these cells are presented.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burgess A. W., Metcalf D., Russell S. H., Nicola N. A. Granulocyte/macrophage-, megakaryocyte-, eosinophil- and erythroid-colony-stimulating factors produced by mouse spleen cells. Biochem J. 1980 Feb 1;185(2):301–314. doi: 10.1042/bj1850301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grabske R. J., Lake S., Gledhill B. L., Meistrich M. L. Centrifugal elutriation: separation of spermatogenic cells on the basis of sedimentation velocity. J Cell Physiol. 1975 Aug;86(1):177–189. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040860119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heath D. S., Axelrad A. A., McLeod D. L., Shreeve M. M. Separation of the erythropoietin-responsive progenitors BFU-E and CFU-E in mouse bone marrow by unit gravity sedimentation. Blood. 1976 May;47(5):777–792. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Iscove N. N., Sieber F. Erythroid progenitors in mouse bone marrow detected by macroscopic colony formation in culture. Exp Hematol. 1975 Jan;3(1):32–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnson G. R., Metcalf D. Nature of cells forming erythroid colonies in agar after stimulation by spleen conditioned medium. J Cell Physiol. 1978 Mar;94(3):243–252. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040940302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller R. G., Phillips R. A. Separation of cells by velocity sedimentation. J Cell Physiol. 1969 Jun;73(3):191–201. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040730305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Misiti J., Spivak J. L. Separation of erythroid progenitor cells in mouse bone marrow by isokinetic-gradient sedimentation. Blood. 1979 Jul;54(1):105–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Morstyn G., Nicola N. A., Metcalf D. Purification of hemopoietic progenitor cells from human marrow using a fucose-binding lectin and cell sorting. Blood. 1980 Nov;56(5):798–805. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nicola N. A., Metcalf D., von Melchner H., Burgess A. W. Isolation of murine fetal hemopoietic progenitor cells and selective fractionation of various erythroid precursors. Blood. 1981 Aug;58(2):376–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nijhof W., Wierenga P. K., Goldwasser E. The regeneration of stem cells after a bone marrow depression induced by thiamphenicol. Exp Hematol. 1982 Jan;10(1):36–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nijhof W., Wierenga P. K., Kardaun S. The effect of thiamphenicol on the production of immature red blood cells under anaemic conditions. Br J Haematol. 1977 May;36(1):29–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1977.tb05752.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nijhof W., Wierenga P. K. Thiamphenicol as an inhibitor of early red cell differentiation. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1980 Sep;361(9):1371–1379. doi: 10.1515/bchm2.1980.361.2.1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ogawa M., Parmley R. T., Bank H. L., Spicer S. S. Human marrow erythropoiesis in culture. I. Characterization of methylcellulose colony assay. Blood. 1976 Sep;48(3):407–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Till J. E., McCulloch E. A. Hemopoietic stem cell differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 Nov 26;605(4):431–459. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(80)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wagemaker G., Visser T. P. Analysis of the cell cycle of late erythroid progenitor cells by sedimentation at unit gravity. Stem Cells. 1981;1(1):5–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. van Bekkum D. W., van Noord M. J., Maat B., Dicke K. A. Attempts at identification of hemopoietic stem cell in mouse. Blood. 1971 Nov;38(5):547–558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van den Engh G., Visser J., Bol S., Trask B. Concentration of hemopoietic stem cells using a light-activated cell sorter. Blood Cells. 1980;6(4):609–623. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES