Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1982 Oct 1;95(1):205–222. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.1.205

Immunoelectron microscopic studies of the sites of cell-substratum and cell-cell contacts in cultured fibroblasts

PMCID: PMC2112341  PMID: 6815205

Abstract

Our object was to obtain information about the molecular structures present at cell-substratum and cell-cell contact sites formed by cultured fibroblasts. We have carried out double immunoelectron- microscopic labeling experiments on ultrathin frozen sections cut through such contact sites to determine the absolute and relative dispositions of the three proteins fibronectin, vinculin, and alpha- actinin with respect to these sites. (a) Three types of cell-substratum and cell-cell contact sites familiar from plastic sections could also be discriminated in the frozen sections by morphological criteria alone, i.e., the gap distances between the two surfaces, and the presence of submembranous densities. These types were: (i) focal adhesions (FA); (ii) close contacts (CC); and (iii) extracellular matrix contacts (ECM). This morphological typing of the contact sites allowed us to recognize and assign distinctive immunolabeling patterns for the three proteins to each type of site on the frozen sections. (b) FA sites were immunolabeled intracellularly for vinculin and alpha- actinin, with vinculin labeling situated closer to the membrane than alpha-actinin. Fibronectin was not labeled in the narrow gap between the cell surface and the substratum, or between two cells, at FA sites. Control experiments showed that this could not be ascribed to inaccessibility of the FA narrow gap to the immunolabeling reagents but indicated an absence or severe depletion of fibronectin from these sites. (c) CC sites were labeled intracellularly for alpha-actinin but not vinculin and were labeled extracellularly for fibronectin. (d) ECM sites were characterized by large separations (often greater than 100 nm) between the cell and substratum or between two cells, which were connected by long cables of extracellular matrix components, including fibronectin. In late (24-36 h) cultures, ECM contacts predominated over the other types. ECM sites appeared to be of two kinds, one labeled intracellularly for both alpha-actinin and vinculin, the other for alpha-actinin alone. (e) From these and other results, a coherent but tentative scheme is proposed for the molecular ultrastructure of these contacts sites, and specific functional roles are suggested for fibronectin, vinculin, and alpha-actinin in cell adhesion and in the linkage of intracellular microfilaments to membranes at the different types of contact sites.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (9.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abercrombie M., Dunn G. A. Adhesions of fibroblasts to substratum during contact inhibition observed by interference reflection microscopy. Exp Cell Res. 1975 Apr;92(1):57–62. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(75)90636-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. IV. Electron microscopy of the leading lamella. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Aug;67(2):359–367. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90420-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ali I. U., Mautner V., Lanza R., Hynes R. O. Restoration of normal morphology, adhesion and cytoskeleton in transformed cells by addition of a transformation-sensitive surface protein. Cell. 1977 May;11(1):115–126. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90322-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Avnur Z., Geiger B. The removal of extracellular fibronectin from areas of cell-substrate contact. Cell. 1981 Jul;25(1):121–132. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90236-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Begg D. A., Rodewald R., Rebhun L. I. The visualization of actin filament polarity in thin sections. Evidence for the uniform polarity of membrane-associated filaments. J Cell Biol. 1978 Dec;79(3):846–852. doi: 10.1083/jcb.79.3.846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bereiter-Hahn J., Fox C. H., Thorell B. Quantitative reflection contrast microscopy of living cells. J Cell Biol. 1979 Sep;82(3):767–779. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.3.767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergmann J. E., Tokuyasu K. T., Singer S. J. Passage of an integral membrane protein, the vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein, through the Golgi apparatus en route to the plasma membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Mar;78(3):1746–1750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.3.1746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Birchmeier C., Kreis T. E., Eppenberger H. M., Winterhalter K. H., Birchmeier W. Corrugated attachment membrane in WI-38 fibroblasts: alternating fibronectin fibers and actin-containing focal contacts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jul;77(7):4108–4112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.7.4108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bornstein P., Ash J. F. Cell surface-associated structural proteins in connective tissue cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jun;74(6):2480–2484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.6.2480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Burridge K., Feramisco J. R. Microinjection and localization of a 130K protein in living fibroblasts: a relationship to actin and fibronectin. Cell. 1980 Mar;19(3):587–595. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(80)80035-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. CURTIS A. S. THE MECHANISM OF ADHESION OF CELLS TO GLASS. A STUDY BY INTERFERENCE REFLECTION MICROSCOPY. J Cell Biol. 1964 Feb;20:199–215. doi: 10.1083/jcb.20.2.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen L. B., Murray A., Segal R. A., Bushnell A., Walsh M. L. Studies on intercellular LETS glycoprotein matrices. Cell. 1978 Jun;14(2):377–391. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90123-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen W. T. Mechanism of retraction of the trailing edge during fibroblast movement. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jul;90(1):187–200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.1.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen W. T., Singer S. J. Fibronectin is not present in the focal adhesions formed between normal cultured fibroblasts and their substrata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Dec;77(12):7318–7322. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.12.7318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Couchman J. R., Rees D. A. The behaviour of fibroblasts migrating from chick heart explants: changes in adhesion, locomotion and growth, and in the distribution of actomyosin and fibronectin. J Cell Sci. 1979 Oct;39:149–165. doi: 10.1242/jcs.39.1.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dutton A. H., Tokuyasu K. T., Singer S. J. Iron-dextran antibody conjugates: General method for simultaneous staining of two components in high-resolution immunoelectron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jul;76(7):3392–3396. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fox C. H., Cottler-Fox M. H., Yamada K. M. The distribution of fibronectin in attachment sites of chick fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1980 Dec;130(2):477–481. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(80)90031-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Furcht L. T., Mosher D. F., Wendelschafer-Crabb G. Immunocytochemical localization of fibronectin (LETS proteins) on the surface of L6 myoblasts: light and electron microscopic studies. Cell. 1978 Feb;13(2):263–271. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90195-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Furcht L. T., Wendelschafer-Crabb G., Mosher D. F., Foidart J. M. An axial periodic fibrillar arrangement of antigenic determinants for fibronectin and procollagen on ascorbate treated human fibroblasts. J Supramol Struct. 1980;13(1):15–33. doi: 10.1002/jss.400130103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Geiger B. A 130K protein from chicken gizzard: its localization at the termini of microfilament bundles in cultured chicken cells. Cell. 1979 Sep;18(1):193–205. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90368-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Geiger B., Dutton A. H., Tokuyasu K. T., Singer S. J. Immunoelectron microscope studies of membrane-microfilament interactions: distributions of alpha-actinin, tropomyosin, and vinculin in intestinal epithelial brush border and chicken gizzard smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1981 Dec;91(3 Pt 1):614–628. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Geiger B., Singer S. J. The participation of alpha-actinin in the capping of cell membrane components. Cell. 1979 Jan;16(1):213–222. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90202-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Geiger B., Tokuyasu K. T., Dutton A. H., Singer S. J. Vinculin, an intracellular protein localized at specialized sites where microfilament bundles terminate at cell membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jul;77(7):4127–4131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.7.4127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Geiger B., Tokuyasu K. T., Singer S. J. Immunocytochemical localization of alpha-actinin in intestinal epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jun;76(6):2833–2837. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.6.2833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Geuze H. J., Slot J. W., van der Ley P. A., Scheffer R. C. Use of colloidal gold particles in double-labeling immunoelectron microscopy of ultrathin frozen tissue sections. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jun;89(3):653–665. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.3.653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Greve J. M., Gottlieb D. I. Monoclonal antibodies which alter the morphology of cultured chick myogenic cells. J Cell Biochem. 1982;18(2):221–229. doi: 10.1002/jcb.1982.240180209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Grinnell F., Bennett M. H. Fibroblast adhesion on collagen substrata in the presence and absence of plasma fibronectin. J Cell Sci. 1981 Apr;48:19–34. doi: 10.1242/jcs.48.1.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Harris A. Location of cellular adhesions to solid substrata. Dev Biol. 1973 Nov;35(1):97–114. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90009-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Heath J. P., Dunn G. A. Cell to substratum contacts of chick fibroblasts and their relation to the microfilament system. A correlated interference-reflexion and high-voltage electron-microscope study. J Cell Sci. 1978 Feb;29:197–212. doi: 10.1242/jcs.29.1.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. Early contacts between fibroblasts. An ultrastructural study. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Mar 30;78(1):71–78. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. Early contacts between normal fibroblasts and mouse sarcoma cells. An ultrastructural study. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Apr;78(2):479–481. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90098-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hedman K., Vaheri A., Wartiovaara J. External fibronectin of cultured human fibroblasts is predominantly a matrix protein. J Cell Biol. 1978 Mar;76(3):748–760. doi: 10.1083/jcb.76.3.748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Heggeness M. H., Ash J. F., Singer S. J. Transmembrane linkage of fibronectin to intracellular actin-containing filaments in cultured human fibroblasts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1978 Jun 20;312:414–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1978.tb16822.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hynes R. O., Bye J. M. Density and cell cycle dependence of cell surface proteins in hamster fibroblasts. Cell. 1974 Oct;3(2):113–120. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(74)90114-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hynes R. O., Destree A. T. Relationships between fibronectin (LETS protein) and actin. Cell. 1978 Nov;15(3):875–886. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90272-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hynes R. O., Destree A. T., Wagner D. D. Relationships between microfilaments, cell-substratum adhesion, and fibronectin. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1982;46(Pt 2):659–670. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1982.046.01.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Izzard C. S., Lochner L. R. Cell-to-substrate contacts in living fibroblasts: an interference reflexion study with an evaluation of the technique. J Cell Sci. 1976 Jun;21(1):129–159. doi: 10.1242/jcs.21.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Izzard C. S., Lochner L. R. Formation of cell-to-substrate contacts during fibroblast motility: an interference-reflexion study. J Cell Sci. 1980 Apr;42:81–116. doi: 10.1242/jcs.42.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kishida Y., Olsen B. R., Berg R. A., Prockop D. J. Two improved methods for preparing ferritin-protein conjugates for electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1975 Feb;64(2):331–339. doi: 10.1083/jcb.64.2.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Knudsen K. A., Rao P. E., Damsky C. H., Buck C. A. Membrane glycoproteins involved in cell--substratum adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Oct;78(10):6071–6075. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.10.6071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lazarides E., Burridge K. Alpha-actinin: immunofluorescent localization of a muscle structural protein in nonmuscle cells. Cell. 1975 Nov;6(3):289–298. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(75)90180-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Little C. D., Chen W. T. Masking of extracellular collagen and the co-distribution of collagen and fibronectin during matrix formation by cultured embryonic fibroblasts. J Cell Sci. 1982 Jun;55:35–50. doi: 10.1242/jcs.55.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pinto da Silva P., Gilula N. B. Gap junctions in normal and transformed fibroblasts in culture. Exp Cell Res. 1972;71(2):393–401. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90309-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Polinger I. S. Separation of cell types in embryonic heart cell cultures. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Nov;63(1):78–82. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90333-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Revel J. P., Wolken K. Electronmicroscope investigations of the underside of cells in culture. Exp Cell Res. 1973 Mar 30;78(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(73)90031-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Singer I. I., Paradiso P. R. A transmembrane relationship between fibronectin and vinculin (130 kd protein): serum modulation in normal and transformed hamster fibroblasts. Cell. 1981 May;24(2):481–492. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90339-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Singer I. I. The fibronexus: a transmembrane association of fibronectin-containing fibers and bundles of 5 nm microfilaments in hamster and human fibroblasts. Cell. 1979 Mar;16(3):675–685. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90040-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Small J. V., Isenberg G., Celis J. E. Polarity of actin at the leading edge of cultured cells. Nature. 1978 Apr 13;272(5654):638–639. doi: 10.1038/272638a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Terry A. H., Culp L. A. Substrate-attached glycoproteins from normal and virus-transformed cells. Biochemistry. 1974 Jan 29;13(3):414–425. doi: 10.1021/bi00700a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tokuyasu K. T. A technique for ultracryotomy of cell suspensions and tissues. J Cell Biol. 1973 May;57(2):551–565. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.2.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tokuyasu K. T., Dutton A. H., Geiger B., Singer S. J. Ultrastructure of chicken cardiac muscle as studied by double immunolabeling in electron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Dec;78(12):7619–7623. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Tokuyasu K. T., Singer S. J. Improved procedures for immunoferritin labeling of ultrathin frozen sections. J Cell Biol. 1976 Dec;71(3):894–906. doi: 10.1083/jcb.71.3.894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Vaheri A., Kurkinen M., Lehto V. P., Linder E., Timpl R. Codistribution of pericellular matrix proteins in cultured fibroblasts and loss in transformation: fibronectin and procollagen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Oct;75(10):4944–4948. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.10.4944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wehland J., Osborn M., Weber K. Cell-to-substratum contacts in living cells: a direct correlation between interference-reflexion and indirect-immunofluorescence microscopy using antibodies against actin and alpha-actinin. J Cell Sci. 1979 Jun;37:257–273. doi: 10.1242/jcs.37.1.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wilkins J. A., Lin S. High-affinity interaction of vinculin with actin filaments in vitro. Cell. 1982 Jan;28(1):83–90. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90377-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Willingham M. C., Yamada K. M., Yamada S. S., Pouysségur J., Pastan I. Microfilament bundles and cell shape are related to adhesiveness to substratum and are dissociable from growth control in cultured fibroblasts. Cell. 1977 Mar;10(3):375–380. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yamada K. M., Olden K. Fibronectins--adhesive glycoproteins of cell surface and blood. Nature. 1978 Sep 21;275(5677):179–184. doi: 10.1038/275179a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES