Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1983 Mar 1;96(3):783–795. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.3.783

Distribution of alpha-actinin in single isolated smooth muscle cells

PMCID: PMC2112412  PMID: 6403554

Abstract

In order to probe the organization of the contractile machinery in smooth muscle, we have studied the distribution of alpha-actinin, a protein present in high concentration in dense bodies, structures apparently analogous to the Z-disks of striated muscle. Localization of alpha-actinin in single isolated smooth muscle cells of the stomach muscularis of Bufo marinus was determined by analysis of the pattern of anti-alpha-actinin staining in single fluorescence photomicrographs, stereo pair micrographs, and computerized three-dimensional reconstructions from multiple image planes. The distribution of anti- alpha-actinin and antitubulin staining was compared in contracted and relaxed cells. The studies revealed that alpha-actinin is present in high concentrations in fusiform elements (mean axial ratio = 4.82) throughout the cytoplasm and in larger, more irregularly shaped plaques along the cell margins. Many of the fusiform-stained elements are organized into stringlike arrays characterized by a regular repeating pattern (mean center-to-center interspace = 2.2 +/- 0.1 micron). These linear arrays appear to terminate at the anti-alpha-actinin stained larger plaques along the cell margin; several of these strings often run in parallel with their elements in lateral register. While this general pattern of organization is maintained in cells during contraction, the distance between successive stained elements in stringlike arrays is decreased. We suggest that the decrease in the distance between elements in these strings results from shortening of materials that constitute these linear arrays. We do not believe that the shortening within these arrays reflects compression by forces generated elsewhere within the cell, as the reorganization of noncontractile microtubules is qualitatively different from the changes in the pattern of anti-alpha-actinin staining.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (5.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashton F. T., Somlyo A. V., Somlyo A. P. The contractile apparatus of vascular smooth muscle: intermediate high voltage stereo electron microscopy. J Mol Biol. 1975 Oct 15;98(1):17–29. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80098-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bagby R. M. Double-immunofluorescent staining of isolated smooth muscle cells. I. preparation of anti-chicken gizzard alpha-actinin and its use with anti-chicken gizzard myosin for co-localization of alpha-actinin and myosin in chicken gizzard cells. Histochemistry. 1980;69(2):113–130. doi: 10.1007/BF00533128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bagby R. M., Pepe F. A. Striated myofibrils in anti-myosin stained, isolated chicken gizzard smooth muscle cells. Histochemistry. 1978 Dec 1;58(3):219–235. doi: 10.1007/BF00495721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooke P. H., Fay F. S. Thick myofilaments in contracted and relaxed mammalian smooth muscle cells. Exp Cell Res. 1972;71(2):265–272. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90292-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Devine C. E., Somlyo A. P. Thick filaments in vascular smooth muscle. J Cell Biol. 1971 Jun;49(3):636–649. doi: 10.1083/jcb.49.3.636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fay F. S., Delise C. M. Contraction of isolated smooth-muscle cells--structural changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Mar;70(3):641–645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.3.641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fay F. S., Hoffmann R., Leclair S., Merriam P. Preparation of individual smooth muscle cells from the stomach of Bufo marinus. Methods Enzymol. 1982;85(Pt B):284–292. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(82)85027-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fay F. S., Singer J. J. Characteristics of response of isolated smooth muscle cells to cholinergic drugs. Am J Physiol. 1977 Mar;232(3):C144–C154. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1977.232.3.C144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fisher B. A., Bagby R. M. Reorientation of myofilaments during contraction of a vertebrate smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1977 Jan;232(1):C5–14. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1977.232.1.C5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fujiwara K., Pollard T. D. Simultaneous localization of myosin and tubulin in human tissue culture cells by double antibody staining. J Cell Biol. 1978 Apr;77(1):182–195. doi: 10.1083/jcb.77.1.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fujiwara K., Porter M. E., Pollard T. D. Alpha-actinin localization in the cleavage furrow during cytokinesis. J Cell Biol. 1978 Oct;79(1):268–275. doi: 10.1083/jcb.79.1.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goli D. E., Suzuki A., Temple J., Holmes G. R. Studies on purified -actinin. I. Effect of temperature and tropomyosin on the -actinin-F-actin interaction. J Mol Biol. 1972 Jun 28;67(3):469–488. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90464-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gröschel-Stewart U., Chamley J. H., Campbell G. R., Burnstock G. Changes in myosin distribution in dedifferentiating and redifferentiating smooth muscle cells in tissue culture. Cell Tissue Res. 1975 Dec 29;165(1):13–22. doi: 10.1007/BF00222796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gröschel-Stewart U., Chamley J. H., McConnell J. D., Burnstock G. Comparison of the reaction of cultured smooth and cardiac muscle cells and fibroblasts to specific antibodies to myosin. Histochemistry. 1975 Jun 5;43(3):215–224. doi: 10.1007/BF00499702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lazarides E. Intermediate filaments as mechanical integrators of cellular space. Nature. 1980 Jan 17;283(5744):249–256. doi: 10.1038/283249a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Osborn M., Born T., Koitsch H. J., Weber K. Stereo immunofluorescence microscopy: I. Three-dimensional arrangement of microfilaments, microtubules and tonofilaments. Cell. 1978 Jul;14(3):477–488. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90234-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. PEASE D. C., MOLINARI S. Electron microscopy of muscular arteries; pial vessels of43 the cat and monkey. J Ultrastruct Res. 1960 Jun;3:447–468. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(60)90022-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rice R. V., Moses J. A., McManus G. M., Brady A. C., Blasik L. M. The organization of contractile filaments in a mammalian smooth muscle. J Cell Biol. 1970 Oct;47(1):183–196. doi: 10.1083/jcb.47.1.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SOROKIN S. Centrioles and the formation of rudimentary cilia by fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1962 Nov;15:363–377. doi: 10.1083/jcb.15.2.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Small J. V. Contractile units in vertebrate smooth muscle cells. Nature. 1974 May 24;249(455):324–327. doi: 10.1038/249324a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Small J. V. Studies on isolated smooth muscle cells: The contractile apparatus. J Cell Sci. 1977 Apr;24:327–349. doi: 10.1242/jcs.24.1.327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Suzuki A., Goll D. E., Singh I., Allen R. E., Robson R. M., Stromer M. H. Some properties of purified skeletal muscle alpha-actinin. J Biol Chem. 1976 Nov 10;251(21):6860–6870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tucker R. W., Pardee A. B., Fujiwara K. Centriole ciliation is related to quiescence and DNA synthesis in 3T3 cells. Cell. 1979 Jul;17(3):527–535. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90261-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES