Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1983 Sep 1;97(3):838–848. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.3.838

High mobility group proteins of amphibian oocytes: a large storage pool of a soluble high mobility group-1-like protein and involvement in transcriptional events

PMCID: PMC2112546  PMID: 6224801

Abstract

Oocytes of several amphibian species (Xenopus laevis, Rana temporaria, and Pleurodeles waltlii) contained a relatively large pool of nonchromatin-bound, soluble high mobility group (HMG) protein with properties similar to those of calf thymus proteins HMG-1 and HMG-2 (protein HMG-A; A, amphibian). About half of this soluble HMG-A was located in the nuclear sap, the other half was recovered in enucleated ooplasms. This protein was identified by its mobility on one- and two- dimensional gel electrophoresis, by binding of antibodies to calf thymus HMG-1 to polypeptides electrophoretically separated and blotted on nitrocellulose paper, and by tryptic peptide mapping of radioiodinated polypeptides. Most, if not all, of the HMG-A in the soluble nuclear protein fraction, preparatively defined as supernatant obtained after centrifugation at 100,000 g for 1 h, was in free monomeric form, apparently not bound to other proteins. On gel filtration it eluted with a mean peak corresponding to an apparent molecular weight of approximately 25,000; on sucrose gradient centrifugation it appeared with a very low S value (2-3 S), and on isoelectric focusing it appeared in fractions ranging from pH approximately 7 to 9. This soluble HMG-A was retained on DEAE-Sephacel but could be eluted already at moderate salt concentrations (0.2 M KCl). In oocytes of various stages of oogenesis HMG-A was accumulated in the nucleus up to concentrations of approximately 14 ng per nucleus (in Xenopus), corresponding to approximately 0.2 mg/ml, similar to those of the nucleosomal core histones. This nuclear concentration is also demonstrated using immunofluorescence microscopy. When antibodies to bovine HMG-1 were microinjected into nuclei of living oocytes of Pleurodeles the lateral loops of the lampbrush chromosomes gradually retracted and the whole chromosomes condensed. As shown using electron microscopy of spread chromatin from such injected oocyte nuclei, this process of loop retraction was accompanied by the appearance of variously-sized and irregularly-spaced gaps within transcriptional units of chromosomal loops but not of nucleoli, indicating that the transcription of non-nucleolar genes was specifically inhibited by this treatment and hence involved an HMG-1-like protein. These data show that proteins of the HMG-1 and -2 category, which are usually chromatin- bound components, can exist, at least in amphibian oocytes, in a free soluble monomeric form, apparently not bound to other molecules. The possible role of this large oocyte pool of soluble HMG-A in early embryogenesis is discussed as well as the possible existence of soluble HMG proteins in other cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adamson E. D., Woodland H. R. Histone synthesis in early amphibian development: histone and DNA syntheses are not co-ordinated. J Mol Biol. 1974 Sep 15;88(2):263–285. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90481-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhullar B. S., Hewitt J., Candido E. P. The large high mobility group proteins of rainbow trout are localized predominantly in the nucleus and nucleoli of a cultured trout cell line. J Biol Chem. 1981 Aug 25;256(16):8801–8806. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bidney D. L., Reeck G. R. Purification from cultured hepatoma cells of two nonhistone chromatin proteins with preferential affinity for single-stranded DNA: apparent analogy with calf thymus HMG proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Dec 14;85(3):1211–1218. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(78)90671-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bona M., Scheer U., Bautz E. K. Antibodies of RNA polymerase II (B) inhibit transcription in Lampbrush chromosomes after microinjection into living amphibian oocytes. J Mol Biol. 1981 Sep 5;151(1):81–99. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90222-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruder G., Heid H., Jarasch E. D., Keenan T. W., Mather I. H. Characteristics of membrane-bound and soluble forms of xanthine oxidase from milk and endothelial cells of capillaries. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982 Mar 4;701(3):357–369. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(82)90239-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bustin M., Dunn B., Gillette R., Mendelsohn E., Soares N. Antigenic determinants of high mobility group chromosomal proteins 1 and 2. Biochemistry. 1982 Dec 21;21(26):6773–6777. doi: 10.1021/bi00269a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bustin M., Hopkins R. B., Isenberg I. Immunological relatedness of high mobility group chromosomal proteins from calf thymus. J Biol Chem. 1978 Mar 10;253(5):1694–1699. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bustin M., Neihart N. K. Antibodies against chromosomal HMG proteins stain the cytoplasm of mammalian cells. Cell. 1979 Jan;16(1):181–189. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dabauvalle M. C., Franke W. W. Karyophilic proteins: polypeptides synthesized in vitro accumulate in the nucleus on microinjection into the cytoplasm of amphibian oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Sep;79(17):5302–5306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.17.5302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dumont J. N. Oogenesis in Xenopus laevis (Daudin). I. Stages of oocyte development in laboratory maintained animals. J Morphol. 1972 Feb;136(2):153–179. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051360203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Elder J. H., Pickett R. A., 2nd, Hampton J., Lerner R. A. Radioiodination of proteins in single polyacrylamide gel slices. Tryptic peptide analysis of all the major members of complex multicomponent systems using microgram quantities of total protein. J Biol Chem. 1977 Sep 25;252(18):6510–6515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gabrielli F., Hancock R., Faber A. J. Characterisation of a chromatin fraction bearing pulse-labelled RNA. 2. Quantification of histones and high-mobility-group proteins. Eur J Biochem. 1981 Nov;120(2):363–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb05713.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Georgieva E. I., Pashev I. G., Tsanev R. G. Distribution of high mobility group and other acid-soluble proteins in fractionated chromatin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Jan 29;652(1):240–244. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(81)90228-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gigi O., Geiger B., Eshhar Z., Moll R., Schmid E., Winter S., Schiller D. L., Franke W. W. Detection of a cytokeratin determinant common to diverse epithelial cells by a broadly cross-reacting monoclonal antibody. EMBO J. 1982;1(11):1429–1437. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01334.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin G. H., Johns E. W. Are the high mobility group non-histone chromosomal proteins associated with 'active' chromatin? Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Jun 22;519(1):279–284. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(78)90081-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodwin G. H., Woodhead L., Johns E. W. The presence of high mobility group non-histone chromatin proteins in isolated nucleosomes. FEBS Lett. 1977 Jan 15;73(1):85–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gordon J. S., Bruno J., Lucas J. J. Heterogeneous binding of high mobility group chromosomal proteins to nuclei. J Cell Biol. 1981 Feb;88(2):373–379. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.2.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Isackson P. J., Bidney D. L., Reeck G. R., Neihart N. K., Bustin M. High mobility group chromosomal proteins isolated from muclei and cytosol of cultured hepatoma cells are similar. Biochemistry. 1980 Sep 16;19(19):4466–4471. doi: 10.1021/bi00560a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Isackson P. J., Fishback J. L., Bidney D. L., Reeck G. R. Preferential affinity of high molecular weight high mobility group non-histone chromatin proteins for single-stranded DNA. J Biol Chem. 1979 Jul 10;254(13):5569–5572. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jackson J. B., Pollock J. M., Jr, Rill R. L. Chromatin fractionation procedure that yields nucleosomes containing near-stoichiometric amounts of high mobility group nonhistone chromosomal proteins. Biochemistry. 1979 Aug 21;18(17):3739–3748. doi: 10.1021/bi00584a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Javaherian K., Liu J. F., Wang J. C. Nonhistone proteins HMG1 and HMG2 change the DNA helical structure. Science. 1978 Mar 24;199(4335):1345–1346. doi: 10.1126/science.628842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kleinschmidt J. A., Franke W. W. Soluble acidic complexes containing histones H3 and H4 in nuclei of Xenopus laevis oocytes. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):799–809. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90442-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Krohne G., Franke W. W. A major soluble acidic protein located in nuclei of diverse vertebrate species. Exp Cell Res. 1980 Sep;129(1):167–189. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(80)90341-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Krohne G., Franke W. W. Immunological identification and localization of the predominant nuclear protein of the amphibian oocyte nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Feb;77(2):1034–1038. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.2.1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Krohne G., Stick R., Kleinschmidt J. A., Moll R., Franke W. W., Hausen P. Immunological localization of a major karyoskeletal protein in nucleoli of oocytes and somatic cells of Xenopus laevis. J Cell Biol. 1982 Sep;94(3):749–754. doi: 10.1083/jcb.94.3.749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuehl L., Lyness T., Dixon G. H., Levy-Wilson B. Distribution of high mobility group proteins among domains of trout testis chromatin differing in their susceptibility to micrococcal nuclease. J Biol Chem. 1980 Feb 10;255(3):1090–1095. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Laskey R. A., Mills A. D., Morris N. R. Assembly of SV40 chromatin in a cell-free system from Xenopus eggs. Cell. 1977 Feb;10(2):237–243. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90217-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Levy W. B., Dixon G. H. A study of the localization of high mobility group proteins in chromatin. Can J Biochem. 1978 Jun;56(6):480–491. doi: 10.1139/o78-075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mathew C. G., Goodwin G. H., Johns E. W. Studies on the association of the high mobility group non-histone chromatin proteins with isolated nucleosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Jan;6(1):167–179. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.1.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mathis D., Oudet P., Chambon P. Structure of transcribing chromatin. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1980;24:1–55. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60670-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Merriam R. W., Hill R. J. The germinal vesicle nucleus of Xenopus laevis oocytes as a selective storage receptacle for proteins. J Cell Biol. 1976 Jun;69(3):659–668. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.3.659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rechsteiner M., Kuehl L. Microinjection of the nonhistone chromosomal protein HMG1 into bovine fibroblasts and HeLa cells. Cell. 1979 Apr;16(4):901–908. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90105-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Romani M., Vidali G., Tahourdin C. S., Bustin M. Solid phase radioimmunoassay for chromosomal components. J Biol Chem. 1980 Jan 25;255(2):468–474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Salik J., Herlands L., Hoffmann H. P., Poccia D. Electrophoretic analysis of the stored histone pool in unfertilized sea urchin eggs: quantification and identification by antibody binding. J Cell Biol. 1981 Aug;90(2):385–395. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.2.385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Scalenghe F., Buscaglia M., Steinheil C., Crippa M. Large scale isolation of nuclei and nucleoli from vitellogenic oocytes of Xenopus laevis. Chromosoma. 1978 May 16;66(4):299–308. doi: 10.1007/BF00328531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Scheer U., Franke W. W., Trendelenburg M. F., Spring H. Classification of loops of lampbrush chromosomes according to the arrangement of transcriptional complexes. J Cell Sci. 1976 Dec;22(3):503–519. doi: 10.1242/jcs.22.3.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Scheer U., Sommerville J., Bustin M. Injected histone antibodies interfere with transcription of lampbrush chromosome loops in oocytes of Pleurodeles. J Cell Sci. 1979 Dec;40:1–20. doi: 10.1242/jcs.40.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Scheer U., Trendelenburg M. F., Krohne G., Franke W. W. Lengths and patterns of transcriptional units in the amplified nucleoli of oocytes of Xenopus laevis. Chromosoma. 1977 Mar 16;60(2):147–167. doi: 10.1007/BF00288462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith B. J., Robertson D., Birbeck M. S., Goodwin G. H., Johns E. W. Immunochemical studies of high mobility group non-histone chromatin proteins HMG 1 and HMG 2. Exp Cell Res. 1978 Sep;115(2):420–423. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(78)90298-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Switzer R. C., 3rd, Merril C. R., Shifrin S. A highly sensitive silver stain for detecting proteins and peptides in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1979 Sep 15;98(1):231–237. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90732-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4350–4354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Vidali G., Boffa L. C., Allfrey V. G. Selective release of chromosomal proteins during limited DNAase 1 digestion of avian erythrocyte chromatin. Cell. 1977 Oct;12(2):409–415. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90117-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Walker J. M., Gooderham K., Hastings J. R., Mayes E., Johns E. W. The primary structures of non-histone chromosomal proteins HMG 1 and 2. FEBS Lett. 1980 Dec 29;122(2):264–270. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80453-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Walker J. M., Goodwin G. H., Johns E. W. The primary structure of the nucleosome-associated chromosomal protein HMG 14. FEBS Lett. 1979 Apr 15;100(2):394–398. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(79)80378-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Walker J. M., Goodwin G. H., Johns E. W. The similarity between the primary structures of two non-histone chromosomal proteins. Eur J Biochem. 1976 Mar 1;62(3):461–469. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1976.tb10179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Walker J. M., Hastings J. R., Johns E. W. The primary structure of a non-histone chromosomal protein. Eur J Biochem. 1977 Jun 15;76(2):461–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11616.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Weintraub H., Groudine M. Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science. 1976 Sep 3;193(4256):848–856. doi: 10.1126/science.948749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Weisbrod S., Groudine M., Weintraub H. Interaction of HMG 14 and 17 with actively transcribed genes. Cell. 1980 Jan;19(1):289–301. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90410-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Weisbrod S., Wickens M. P., Whytock S., Gurdon J. B. Active chromatin of oocytes injected with somatic cell nuclei or cloned DNA. Dev Biol. 1982 Nov;94(1):216–229. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90085-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Woodland H. R., Adamson E. D. The synthesis and storage of histones during the oogenesis of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1977 May;57(1):118–135. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90359-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu L., Rechsteiner M., Kuehl L. Comparative studies on microinjected high-mobility-group chromosomal proteins, HMG1 and HMG2. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):488–496. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES