Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1982 May 1;93(2):470–478. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.2.470

Changes in contractile proteins during differentiation of myeloid leukemia cells. II. Purification and characterization of actin

K Nagata, J Sagara, Y Ichikawa
PMCID: PMC2112838  PMID: 6124548

Abstract

A myeloid leukemia cell line, M1, differentiates to macrophage and gains locomotive and phagocytic activity when incubated with conditioned medium (CM) from a fibroblast culture and bacterial endotoxin. To characterize the actin molecules before and after differentiation, the actin was purified through three sequential steps: DEAE-sephadex A- 50, polymerization/depolymerization, and sephadex G-150 chromatography. There were no essential differences between the inhibitory activity of actins from control M1 cells and CM-treated M1 cells on both DNase I and heavy meromyosin (HMMM) K(+)-EDTA-ATPase; the same dose response as with skeletal muscle actin took place. After the treatment with CM, however, the specific activity for the activation of HMMM Mg(2+)- ATPase by actin became two-fold that of untreated M1 actin, which was one third of the value for skeletal muscle actin. The V(max) for the control and the CM-treated M1 cell, as well as the skeletal muscle actins, proved to be the same. By contrast, the K(app) values for the control and CM-treated M1-cell actins were 3- and 1.5-fold the value for skeletal-muscle actin. This means that CM treatment of the M1 actin produced a twofold affinity for the Mg(2+)-ATPase of skeletal-muscle myosin. The critical concentrations for polymerization were compared under different salt concentrations and temperatures. Although no marked difference was found for the presence of 2 mM MgCl(2), 0.1 M KCl in place of MgCl(2) at 5 degrees C gave the following values: 0.1 mg/ml for skeletal-muscle actin, 0.7 mg/ml for control M1 actin, 0,5 mg/ml for CM- treated M1 actin, and 1.0 mg/ml for the D(-) subline that is insensitive to CM. Although the critical concentration of D(-) actin is extraordinarily high, this actin showed normal polymerization above the critical concentration. This together with the data presented in our previous paper, that the D(-) actin in the crude extract did not polymerize, suggests that an inhibitor for actin polymerization is present in the subline. The kinetics experiment at 0.1 M KCl and 25 degrees C revealed a slower polymerization of untreated M1- and D(-)-cell actins as compared with CM-treated M1 actin. This delayed polymerization was due to a delay during the nucleation stage, not during the elongation stage. By isoelectric focusing, the ratios of β- to γ-actin showed a marked difference depending on the states of cells: about 4.9 for control M1, 2.8 for CM-treated M1, and 7.6 for D(-)-subline actins. Tryptic peptide maps also revealed the presence of different peptides. Thus, the functional differences of actin before and after the differentiation was accompanied by some chemical changes in actin molecules.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blikstad I., Markey F., Carlsson L., Persson T., Lindberg U. Selective assay of monomeric and filamentous actin in cell extracts, using inhibition of deoxyribonuclease I. Cell. 1978 Nov;15(3):935–943. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90277-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boxer L. A., Hedley-Whyte E. T., Stossel T. P. Neutrophil action dysfunction and abnormal neutrophil behavior. N Engl J Med. 1974 Nov 21;291(21):1093–1099. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197411212912101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bray D., Brownlee S. M. Peptide mapping of proteins from acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1973 Sep;55(1):213–221. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(73)90306-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenner S. L., Korn E. D. Substoichiometric concentrations of cytochalasin D inhibit actin polymerization. Additional evidence for an F-actin treadmill. J Biol Chem. 1979 Oct 25;254(20):9982–9985. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown S. S., Spudich J. A. Cytochalasin inhibits the rate of elongation of actin filament fragments. J Cell Biol. 1979 Dec;83(3):657–662. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.3.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carlsson L., Nyström L. E., Sundkvist I., Markey F., Lindberg U. Actin polymerizability is influenced by profilin, a low molecular weight protein in non-muscle cells. J Mol Biol. 1977 Sep 25;115(3):465–483. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90166-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clarke M., Spudich J. A. Nonmuscle contractile proteins: the role of actin and myosin in cell motility and shape determination. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:797–822. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.004053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Condeelis J. S., Taylor D. L. The contractile basis of amoeboid movement. V. The control of gelation, solation, and contraction in extracts from Dictyostelium discoideum. J Cell Biol. 1977 Sep;74(3):901–927. doi: 10.1083/jcb.74.3.901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies W. A., Stossel T. P. Peripheral hyaline blebs (podosomes) of macrophages. J Cell Biol. 1977 Dec;75(3):941–955. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.3.941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fibach E., Sachs L. Control of normal differentiation of myeloid leukemic cells. IV. Induction of differentiation by serum from endotoxin treated mice. J Cell Physiol. 1974 Apr;83(2):177–185. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040830203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gordon D. J., Boyer J. L., Korn E. D. Comparative biochemistry of non-muscle actins. J Biol Chem. 1977 Nov 25;252(22):8300–8309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gordon D. J., Eisenberg E., Korn E. D. Characterization of cytoplasmic actin isolated from Acanthamoeba castellanii by a new method. J Biol Chem. 1976 Aug 10;251(15):4778–4786. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gordon D. J., Yang Y. Z., Korn E. D. Polymerization of Acanthamoeba actin. Kinetics, thermodynamics, and co-polymerization with muscle actin. J Biol Chem. 1976 Dec 10;251(23):7474–7479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hartwig J. H., Davies W. A., Stossel T. P. Evidence for contractile protein translocation in macrophage spreading, phagocytosis, and phagolysosome formation. J Cell Biol. 1977 Dec;75(3):956–967. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.3.956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hartwig J. H., Stossel T. P. Isolation and properties of actin, myosin, and a new actinbinding protein in rabbit alveolar macrophages. J Biol Chem. 1975 Jul 25;250(14):5696–5705. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hellewell S. B., Taylor D. L. The contractile basis of ameboid movement. VI. The solation-contraction coupling hypothesis. J Cell Biol. 1979 Dec;83(3):633–648. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.3.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hirai K. I., Nagata K., Maeda M., Ichikawa Y. Changes in ultrastructures and enzyme activities during differentiation of myeloid leukemia cells to normal macrophages. Exp Cell Res. 1979 Dec;124(2):269–283. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(79)90203-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hitchcock S. E. Actin deoxyroboncuclease I interaction. Depolymerization and nucleotide exchange. J Biol Chem. 1980 Jun 25;255(12):5668–5673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hitchcock S. E. Regulation of motility in nonmuscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jul;74(1):1–15. doi: 10.1083/jcb.74.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Honma Y., Kasukabe T., Okabe J., Hozumi M. Glucorticoid-induced differentiation of cultured mouse myeloid leukemia cells. Gan. 1977 Apr;68(2):241–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ichikawa Y. Differentiation of a cell line of myeloid leukemia. J Cell Physiol. 1969 Dec;74(3):223–234. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040740303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ichikawa Y. Further studies on the differentiation of a cell line of myeloid leukemia. J Cell Physiol. 1970 Oct;76(2):175–184. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040760207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ichikawa Y., Maeda M., Horiuchi M. Induction of differentiated functions which are reversibly suppressed by cytochalasin B. Exp Cell Res. 1975 Jan;90(1):20–30. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(75)90352-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kasukabe T., Honma Y., Hozumi M. Induction of lysosomal enzyme activities with glucocorticoids during differentiation of cultured mouse myeloid leukemia cells. Gan. 1977 Dec;68(6):765–773. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Krystosek A., Sachs L. Control of lysozyme induction in the differentiation of myeloid leukemic cells. Cell. 1976 Dec;9(4 Pt 2):675–684. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90131-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. LINBERG U. PURIFICATION OF AN INHIBITOR OF PANCREATIC DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE FROM CALF SPLEEN. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Feb 10;82:237–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lazarides E., Lindberg U. Actin is the naturally occurring inhibitor of deoxyribonuclease I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Dec;71(12):4742–4746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.12.4742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leavitt J., Leavitt A., Attallah A. M. Dissimilar modes of expression of beta- and gamma-actin in normal and leukemic human T lymphocytes. J Biol Chem. 1980 Jun 10;255(11):4984–4987. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lotem J., Sachs L. Control of Fc and C3 receptors on myeloid leukemic cells. J Immunol. 1976 Aug;117(2):580–586. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. MacLean-Fletcher S. D., Pollard T. D. Viscometric analysis of the gelation of Acanthamoeba extracts and purification of two gelation factors. J Cell Biol. 1980 May;85(2):414–428. doi: 10.1083/jcb.85.2.414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. MacLean-Fletcher S., Pollard T. D. Identification of a factor in conventional muscle actin preparations which inhibits actin filament self-association. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1980 Sep 16;96(1):18–27. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(80)91175-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Maeda M., Horiuchi M., Numa S., Ichikawa Y. Characterization of a differentiation-stimulating factor for mouse myeloid leukemia cells. Gan. 1977 Aug;68(4):435–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Maeda M., Ichikawa Y. Production of a colony-stimulating factor following differentiation of leukemic myleoblasts to macrophages. J Cell Physiol. 1980 Mar;102(3):323–331. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041020307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Markey F., Lindberg U., Eriksson L. Human platelets contain profilin, a potential regulator of actin polymerisability. FEBS Lett. 1978 Apr 1;88(1):75–79. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(78)80610-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Maruta H., Korn E. D. Purification from Acanthamoeba castellanii of proteins that induce gelation and syneresis of F-actin. J Biol Chem. 1977 Jan 10;252(1):399–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mimura N., Asano A. Ca2+-sensitive gelation of actin filaments by a new protein factor. Nature. 1979 Nov 1;282(5734):44–48. doi: 10.1038/282044a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nagata K., Ichikawa Y. Requirements for RNA and protein synthesis in the induction of several differentiation-markers in a myeloid leukemia cell line. J Cell Physiol. 1979 Jan;98(1):167–175. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040980118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nagata K., Ooguro K., Saito M., Kuboyama M., Ogasa K. A factor inducing differentiation of mouse myeloid leukemia cells in human amniotic fluid. Gan. 1977 Dec;68(6):757–764. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nagata K., Sagara J., Ichikawa Y. Changes in contractile proteins during differentiation of myeloid leukemia cells. I. Polymerization of actin. J Cell Biol. 1980 May;85(2):273–282. doi: 10.1083/jcb.85.2.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nagata K., Takahashi E., Saito M., Ono J., Kuboyama M. Differentiation of a cell line of mouse myeloid leukemia. I. Simultaneous induction of lysosomal enzyme activities and phagocytosis. Exp Cell Res. 1976 Jul;100(2):322–328. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90155-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. O'Farrell P. H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem. 1975 May 25;250(10):4007–4021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pollard T. D. The role of actin in the temperature-dependent gelation and contraction of extracts of Acanthamoeba. J Cell Biol. 1976 Mar;68(3):579–601. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.3.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pollard T. D., Weihing R. R. Actin and myosin and cell movement. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1974 Jan;2(1):1–65. doi: 10.3109/10409237409105443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Prentki M., Chaponnier C., Jeanrenaud B., Gabbiani G. Actin microfilaments, cell shape, and secretory processes in isolated rat hepatocytes. Effect of phalloidin and cytochalasin D. J Cell Biol. 1979 Jun;81(3):592–607. doi: 10.1083/jcb.81.3.592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sakiyama S., Fujimura S., Sakiyama H. Absence of gamma-actin expression in the mouse fibroblast cell line, L. J Biol Chem. 1981 Jan 10;256(1):31–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sargent J. R., Vadlamudi B. P. Electrophoresis of peptides on thin layers of silica gel. Anal Biochem. 1968 Oct 24;25(1):583–587. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(68)90137-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Shizuta Y., Shizuta H., Gallo M., Davies P., Pastan I. Purification and properties of filamin, and actin binding protein from chicken gizzard. J Biol Chem. 1976 Nov 10;251(21):6562–6567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Spudich J. A., Watt S. The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. J Biol Chem. 1971 Aug 10;246(15):4866–4871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Stossel T. P., Hartwig J. H. Interactions of actin, myosin, and a new actin-binding protein of rabbit pulmonary macrophages. II. Role in cytoplasmic movement and phagocytosis. J Cell Biol. 1976 Mar;68(3):602–619. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.3.602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Tilney L. G. The polymerization of actin. II. How nonfilamentous actin becomes nonrandomly distributed in sperm: evidence for the association of this actin with membranes. J Cell Biol. 1976 Apr;69(1):51–72. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tilney L. G. The polymerization of actin. III. Aggregates of nonfilamentous actin and its associated proteins: a storage form of actin. J Cell Biol. 1976 Apr;69(1):73–89. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.1.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang K. Filamin, a new high-molecular-weight protein found in smooth muscle and nonmuscle cells. Purification and properties of chicken gizzard filamin. Biochemistry. 1977 May 3;16(9):1857–1865. doi: 10.1021/bi00628a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Weiss B., Sachs L. Indirect induction of differentiation in myeloid leukemic cells by lipid A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Mar;75(3):1374–1378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.3.1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yagi K., Yazawa Y. Isolation and characterization of a subfragment of myosin A. J Biochem. 1966 Oct;60(4):450–458. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a128457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES