Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1984 Feb 1;98(2):436–443. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.2.436

Control of differentiation in heterokaryons and hybrids involving differentiation-defective myoblast variants

PMCID: PMC2113107  PMID: 6693490

Abstract

Clones of differentiation-defective myoblasts were isolated by selecting clones of L6 rat myoblasts that did not form myotubes under differentiation-stimulating conditions. Rat skeletal myosin light chain synthesis was induced in heterokaryons formed by fusing these defective myoblasts to differentiated chick skeletal myocytes. This indicates that the structural gene for this muscle protein was still responsive to chick inducing factors and that the defective myoblasts were not producing large quantities of molecules that dominantly suppressed the expression of differentiated functions. The regulation of the decision to differentiate was then examined in hybrids between differentiation- defective myoblasts and differentiation-competent myoblasts. Staining with antimyosin antibodies showed that the defective myoblasts and homotypic hybrids formed by fusing defective myoblasts to themselves could in fact differentiate, but did so more than a thousand times less frequently than the 64% differentiation achieved by competent L6 myoblasts or homotypic competent X competent L6 hybrids. Heterotypic hybrids between differentiation-defective myoblasts and competent L6 cells exhibited an intermediate behavior of approximately 1% differentiation. A theoretical model for the regulation of the commitment to terminal differentiation is proposed that could explain these results by invoking the need to achieve threshold levels of secondary inducing molecules in response to differentiation-stimulating conditions. This model helps explain many of the stochastic aspects of cell differentiation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1,014.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bissell M. J. The differentiated state of normal and malignant cells or how to define a "normal" cell in culture. Int Rev Cytol. 1981;70:27–100. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61130-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cahn R. D., Cahn M. B. Heritability of cellular differentiation: clonal growth and expression of differentiation in retinal pigment cells in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Jan;55(1):106–114. doi: 10.1073/pnas.55.1.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark W. A., Jr, Chizzonite R. A., Everett A. W., Rabinowitz M., Zak R. Species correlations between cardiac isomyosins. A comparison of electrophoretic and immunological properties. J Biol Chem. 1982 May 25;257(10):5449–5454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coon H. G. Clonal stability and phenotypic expression of chick cartilage cells in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Jan;55(1):66–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.55.1.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cox D. M., Niewczas-Late V., Riffell M. I., Hamerton J. L. Chromosomal mosaicism in diagnostic amniotic fluid cell cultures. Pediatr Res. 1974 Jun;8(6):679–683. doi: 10.1203/00006450-197406000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harrison P. R., Rutherford T., Conkie D., Affara N., Sommerville J., Hissey P., Paul J. Analysis of erythroid differentiation in Friend cells using noninducible variants. Cell. 1978 May;14(1):61–70. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90301-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hayward M. A., Mitchell T. A., Shapiro D. J. Induction of estrogen receptor and reversal of the nuclear/cytoplasmic receptor ratio during vitellogenin synthesis and withdrawal in Xenopus laevis. J Biol Chem. 1980 Dec 10;255(23):11308–11312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaufman S. J., Parks C. M. Loss of growth control and differentiation in the fu-1 variant of the L8 line of rat myoblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Sep;74(9):3888–3892. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.9.3888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Konieczny S. F., Coleman J. R. Analysis of myogenesis by somatic cell hybridization: III. Myogenic competence of hybrids derived from rat L6 myoblasts and mouse primary fibroblasts and myoblasts. Somatic Cell Genet. 1983 Jan;9(1):25–42. doi: 10.1007/BF01544046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lawrence J. B., Coleman J. R. Analysis of myogenesis by somatic cell hybridization. II. Retention of myogenic competence and suppression of transformed properties in hybrids between differentiation competent and incompetent rat L6 myoblasts. J Cell Physiol. 1983 Jan;114(1):99–110. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041140117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lawrence J. B., Konieczny S. F., Shaffer M., Coleman A. W., Coleman J. R. Analysis of myogenesis by somatic cell hybridization. I. Myogenic competence of homotypic hybrids derived from rat L6 myoblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1982 Dec;142(2):261–272. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(82)90367-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Loomis W. F., Jr, Wahrmann J. P., Luzzati D. Temperature-sensitive variants of an established myoblast line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Feb;70(2):425–429. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.2.425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mandel J. L., Pearson M. L. Insulin stimulates myogenesis in a rat myoblast line. Nature. 1974 Oct 18;251(5476):618–620. doi: 10.1038/251618a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ng S. K., Rogers J., Sanwal B. D. Alterations in differentiation and pyrimidine pathway enzymes in 5-azacytidine resistant variants of a myoblast line. J Cell Physiol. 1977 Feb;90(2):361–347. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040900221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. O'Farrell P. H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem. 1975 May 25;250(10):4007–4021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Peterson J. A. The widespread nature of phenotypic variability in hepatomas and cell lines, in the form of a geometric series. J Theor Biol. 1983 May 7;102(1):41–53. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(83)90261-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sanger J. W. The use of cytochalasin B to distinguish myoblasts from fibroblasts in cultures of developing chick striated muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Sep;71(9):3621–3625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.9.3621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shapiro D. Steroid hormone regulation of vitellogenin gene expression. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1982 Mar;12(3):187–203. doi: 10.3109/10409238209108706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Somers D. G., Pearson M. L., Ingles C. J. Isolation and characterization of an alpha-amanitin-resistant rat myoblast mutant cell line possessing alpha-amanitin-resistant RNA polymerase II. J Biol Chem. 1975 Jul 10;250(13):4825–4831. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tarikas H., Schubert D. Regulation of adenylate kinase and creatine kinase activities in myogenic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jun;71(6):2377–2381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.6.2377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vertel B. M., Fischman D. A. Myosin accumulation in mononucleated cells of chick muscle cultures. Dev Biol. 1976 Feb;48(2):438–446. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90105-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wright W. E., Aronoff J. The suppression of myogenic functions in heterokaryons formed by fusing chick myocytes to diploid rat fibroblasts. Cell Differ. 1983 May;12(5):299–306. doi: 10.1016/0045-6039(83)90026-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wright W. E., Gros F. Coexpression of myogenic functions in L6 rat x T984 mouse myoblast hybrids. Dev Biol. 1981 Aug;86(1):236–240. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90335-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wright W. E. Induction of muscle genes in neural cells. J Cell Biol. 1984 Feb;98(2):427–435. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.2.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wright W. E. Recovery of heterokaryons at high cell densities following isolation using irreversible biochemical inhibitors. Somatic Cell Genet. 1981 Nov;7(6):769–775. doi: 10.1007/BF01538763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wright W. E. Synthesis of rat myosin light chains in heterokaryons formed between undifferentiated rat myoblasts and chick skeletal myocytes. J Cell Biol. 1981 Oct;91(1):11–16. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wright W. E. The isolation of heterokaryons and hybrids by a selective system using irreversible biochemical inhibitors. Exp Cell Res. 1978 Mar 15;112(2):395–407. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(78)90222-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yaffe D. Retention of differentiation potentialities during prolonged cultivation of myogenic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Oct;61(2):477–483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES