Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1984 May 1;98(5):1730–1745. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.5.1730

Interconversion of metaphase and interphase microtubule arrays, as studied by the injection of centrosomes and nuclei into Xenopus eggs

PMCID: PMC2113192  PMID: 6725396

Abstract

We have designed experiments that distinguish centrosomal , nuclear, and cytoplasmic contributions to the assembly of the mitotic spindle. Mammalian centrosomes acting as microtubule-organizing centers were assayed by injection into Xenopus eggs either in a metaphase or an interphase state. Injection of partially purified centrosomes into interphase eggs induced the formation of extensive asters. Although centrosomes injected into unactivated eggs (metaphase) did not form asters, inhibition of centrosomes is not irreversible in metaphase cytoplasm: subsequent activation caused aster formation. When cytoskeletons containing nuclei and centrosomes were injected into the metaphase cytoplasm, they produced spindle-like structures with clearly defined poles. Electron microscopy revealed centrioles with nucleated microtubules. However, injection of nuclei prepared from karyoplasts that were devoid of centrosomes produced anastral microtubule arrays around condensing chromatin. Co-injection of karyoplast nuclei with centrosomes reconstituted the formation of spindle-like structures with well-defined poles. We conclude from these experiments that in mitosis, the centrosome acts as a microtubule-organizing center only in the proximity of the nucleus or chromatin, whereas in interphase it functions independently. The general implications of these results for the interconversion of metaphase and interphase microtubule arrays in all cells are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Borisy G. G., Olmsted J. B. Nucleated assembly of microtubules in porcine brain extracts. Science. 1972 Sep 29;177(4055):1196–1197. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4055.1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Calarco-Gillam P. D., Siebert M. C., Hubble R., Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Centrosome development in early mouse embryos as defined by an autoantibody against pericentriolar material. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(3 Pt 2):621–629. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90094-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Elinson R. P. Fertilization of immature frog eggs: cleavage and development following subsequent activation. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1977 Feb;37(1):187–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Forbes D. J., Kirschner M. W., Newport J. W. Spontaneous formation of nucleus-like structures around bacteriophage DNA microinjected into Xenopus eggs. Cell. 1983 Aug;34(1):13–23. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90132-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fraser L. R. Physico-chemical properties of an agent that induces parthenogenesis in Rana pipiens eggs. J Exp Zool. 1971 Jun;177(2):153–172. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401770204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Galey F. R., Nilsson S. E. A new method for transferring sections from the liquid surface of the trough through staining solutions to the supporting film of a grid. J Ultrastruct Res. 1966 Feb;14(3):405–410. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(66)80057-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Graham C. F. The regulation of DNA synthesis and mitosis in multinucleate frog eggs. J Cell Sci. 1966 Sep;1(3):363–374. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1.3.363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gurdon J. B. Injected nuclei in frog oocytes: fate, enlargement, and chromatin dispersal. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1976 Dec;36(3):523–540. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gurdon J. B., Woodland H. R. The cytoplasmic control of nuclear activity in animal development. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1968 May;43(2):233–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1968.tb00960.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hara K., Tydeman P., Kirschner M. A cytoplasmic clock with the same period as the division cycle in Xenopus eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jan;77(1):462–466. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.1.462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heidemann S. R., Kirschner M. W. Aster formation in eggs of Xenopus laevis. Induction by isolated basal bodies. J Cell Biol. 1975 Oct;67(1):105–117. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Heidemann S. R., Kirschner M. W. Induced formation of asters and cleavage furrows in oocytes of Xenopus laevis during in vitro maturation. J Exp Zool. 1978 Jun;204(3):431–444. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402040314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Inoué S., Borisy G. G., Kiehart D. P. Growth and lability of Chaetopterus oocyte mitotic spindles isolated in the presence of porcine brain tubulin. J Cell Biol. 1974 Jul;62(1):175–184. doi: 10.1083/jcb.62.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kirschner M. W. Implications of treadmilling for the stability and polarity of actin and tubulin polymers in vivo. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jul;86(1):330–334. doi: 10.1083/jcb.86.1.330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kishimoto T., Kanatani H. Cytoplasmic factor responsible for germinal vesicle breakdown and meiotic maturation in starfish oocyte. Nature. 1976 Mar 25;260(5549):321–322. doi: 10.1038/260321a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lucas J. J., Szekely E., Kates J. R. The regeneration and division of mouse L-cell karyoplasts. Cell. 1976 Jan;7(1):115–122. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90261-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maller J., Poccia D., Nishioka D., Kidd P., Gerhart J., Hartman H. Spindle formation and cleavage in Xenopus eggs injected with centriole-containing fractions from sperm. Exp Cell Res. 1976 May;99(2):285–294. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90585-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mc2ntosh J. R., Cande Z., Snyder J., Vanderslice K. Studies on the mechanism of mitosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;253:407–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb19217.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Merriam R. W. Movement of cytoplasmic proteins into nuclei induced to enlarge and initiate DNA or RNA synthesis. J Cell Sci. 1969 Sep;5(2):333–349. doi: 10.1242/jcs.5.2.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Meyerhof P. G., Masui Y. Chromosome condensation activity in Rana pipiens eggs matured in vivo and in blastomeres arrested by cytostatic factor (CSF). Exp Cell Res. 1979 Oct 15;123(2):345–353. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(79)90476-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Miake-Lye R., Newport J., Kirschner M. Maturation-promoting factor induces nuclear envelope breakdown in cycloheximide-arrested embryos of Xenopus laevis. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jul;97(1):81–91. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Molè-Bajer J., Bajer A. S. Action of taxol on mitosis: modification of microtubule arrangements and function of the mitotic spindle in Haemanthus endosperm. J Cell Biol. 1983 Feb;96(2):527–540. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.2.527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nelkin B., Nichols C., Vogelstein B. Protein factor(s) from mitotic CHO cells induce meiotic maturation in Xenopus laevis oocytes. FEBS Lett. 1980 Jan 14;109(2):233–238. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)81094-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Newport J., Kirschner M. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell. 1982 Oct;30(3):675–686. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90272-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Olmsted J. B., Borisy G. G. Ionic and nucleotide requirements for microtubule polymerization in vitro. Biochemistry. 1975 Jul;14(13):2996–3005. doi: 10.1021/bi00684a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ring D., Hubble R., Kirschner M. Mitosis in a cell with multiple centrioles. J Cell Biol. 1982 Sep;94(3):549–556. doi: 10.1083/jcb.94.3.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rink T. J., Tsien R. Y., Warner A. E. Free calcium in Xenopus embryos measured with ion-selective microelectrodes. Nature. 1980 Feb 14;283(5748):658–660. doi: 10.1038/283658a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shay J. W., Porter K. R., Prescott D. M. The surface morphology and fine structure of CHO (Chinese hamster ovary) cells following enucleation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Aug;71(8):3059–3063. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.8.3059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shelanski M. L., Gaskin F., Cantor C. R. Microtubule assembly in the absence of added nucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Mar;70(3):765–768. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.3.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Smith L. D., Ecker R. E. Role of the oocyte nucleus in physiological maturation in Rana pipiens. Dev Biol. 1969 Mar;19(3):281–309. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(69)90065-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sunkara P. S., Wright D. A., Rao P. N. Mitotic factors from mammalian cells induce germinal vesicle breakdown and chromosome condensation in amphibian oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jun;76(6):2799–2802. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.6.2799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Szollosi D., Calarco P., Donahue R. P. Absence of centrioles in the first and second meiotic spindles of mouse oocytes. J Cell Sci. 1972 Sep;11(2):521–541. doi: 10.1242/jcs.11.2.521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tuffanelli D. L., McKeon F., Kleinsmith D. M., Burnham T. K., Kirschner M. Anticentromere and anticentriole antibodies in the scleroderma spectrum. Arch Dermatol. 1983 Jul;119(7):560–566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Assel S., Brachet J. Formation de cytasters dans les oeufs de batraciens sous l'action de l'eau lourde. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1966 Apr;15(2):143–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vorobjev I. A., Chentsov YuS Centrioles in the cell cycle. I. Epithelial cells. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;93(3):938–949. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.3.938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wasserman W. J., Smith L. D. The cyclic behavior of a cytoplasmic factor controlling nuclear membrane breakdown. J Cell Biol. 1978 Jul;78(1):R15–R22. doi: 10.1083/jcb.78.1.r15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Weisenberg R. C. Microtubule formation in vitro in solutions containing low calcium concentrations. Science. 1972 Sep 22;177(4054):1104–1105. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4054.1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zorn G. A., Lucas J. J., Kates J. R. Purification and characterization of regenerating mouse L929 karyoplasts. Cell. 1979 Nov;18(3):659–672. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90121-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zucker R. S., Steinhardt R. A. Prevention of the cortical reaction in fertilized sea urchin eggs by injection of calcium-chelating ligands. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Jul 17;541(4):459–466. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(78)90155-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES