Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1984 Apr 1;98(4):1453–1473. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.4.1453

The influence of basal lamina on the accumulation of acetylcholine receptors at synaptic sites in regenerating muscle

PMCID: PMC2113239  PMID: 6609164

Abstract

If skeletal muscles are damaged in ways that spare the basal lamina sheaths of the muscle fibers, new myofibers develop within the sheaths and neuromuscular junctions form at the original synaptic sites on them. At the regenerated neuromuscular junctions, as at the original ones, the muscle fiber plasma membrane is characterized by infoldings and a high concentration of acetylcholine receptors (AChRs). The aim of this study was to determine whether or not the synaptic portion of the myofiber basal lamina sheath plays a direct role in the formation of the subsynaptic apparatus on regenerating myofibers, a question raised by the results of earlier experiments. The junctional region of the frog cutaneous pectoris muscle was crushed or frozen, which resulted in disintegration and phagocytosis of all cells at the synapse but left intact much of the myofiber basal lamina. Reinnervation was prevented. When new myofibers developed within the basal lamina sheaths, patches of AChRs and infoldings formed preferentially at sites where the myofiber membrane was apposed to the synaptic region of the sheaths. Processes from unidentified cells gradually came to lie on the presynaptic side of the basal lamina at a small fraction of the synaptic sites, but there was no discernible correlation between their presence and the effectiveness of synaptic sites in accumulating AChRs. We therefore conclude that molecules stably attached to the myofiber basal lamina at synaptic sites direct the formation of subsynaptic apparatus in regenerating myofibers. An analysis of the distribution of AChR clusters at synaptic sites indicated that they formed as a result of myofiber-basal lamina interactions that occurred at numerous places along the synaptic basal lamina, that their presence was not dependent on the formation of plasma membrane infoldings, and that the concentration of receptors within clusters could be as great as the AChR concentration at normal neuromuscular junctions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams J. C. Technical considerations on the use of horseradish peroxidase as a neuronal marker. Neuroscience. 1977;2(1):141–145. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(77)90074-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson M. J., Cohen M. W. Fluorescent staining of acetylcholine receptors in vertebrate skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1974 Mar;237(2):385–400. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson M. J., Cohen M. W., Zorychta E. Effects of innervation on the distribution of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;268(3):731–756. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BIRKS R., KATZ B., MILEDI R. Physiological and structural changes at the amphibian myoneural junction, in the course of nerve degeneration. J Physiol. 1960 Jan;150:145–168. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bader D. Density and distribution of alpha-bungarotoxin-binding sites in postsynaptic structures of regenerated rat skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 1981 Feb;88(2):338–345. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.2.338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berg D. K., Kelly R. B., Sargent P. B., Williamson P., Hall Z. W. Binding of -bungarotoxin to acetylcholine receptors in mammalian muscle (snake venom-denervated muscle-neonatal muscle-rat diaphragm-SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jan;69(1):147–151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Betz W., Sakmann B. Effects of proteolytic enzymes on function and structure of frog neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol. 1973 May;230(3):673–688. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bevan S., Grampp W., Miledi R. Properties of spontaneous potentials at denervated motor endplates of the frog. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976 Oct 15;194(1115):195–210. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1976.0073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bevan S., Steinbach J. H. The distribution of alpha-bungarotoxin binding sites of mammalian skeletal muscle developing in vivo. J Physiol. 1977 May;267(1):195–213. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bischoff R. Regeneration of single skeletal muscle fibers in vitro. Anat Rec. 1975 Jun;182(2):215–235. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091820207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bloch R. J., Geiger B. The localization of acetylcholine receptor clusters in areas of cell-substrate contact in cultures of rat myotubes. Cell. 1980 Aug;21(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90111-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Braithwaite A. W., Harris A. J. Neural influence on acetylcholine receptor clusters in embryonic development of skeletal muscles. Nature. 1979 Jun 7;279(5713):549–551. doi: 10.1038/279549a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Braun M., Schmidt R. F., Zimmermann M. Facilitation at the frog neuromuscular junction during and after repetitive stimulation. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1966;287(1):41–55. doi: 10.1007/BF00362453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Burden S. J., Sargent P. B., McMahan U. J. Acetylcholine receptors in regenerating muscle accumulate at original synaptic sites in the absence of the nerve. J Cell Biol. 1979 Aug;82(2):412–425. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.2.412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Burden S. Development of the neuromuscular junction in the chick embryo: the number, distribution, and stability of acetylcholine receptors. Dev Biol. 1977 Jun;57(2):317–329. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90218-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Burrage T. G., Lentz T. L. Ultrastructural characterization of surface specializations containing high-density acetylcholine receptors on embryonic chick myotubes in vivo and in vitro. Dev Biol. 1981 Jul 30;85(2):267–286. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90259-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. CHANG C. C., LEE C. Y. ISOLATION OF NEUROTOXINS FROM THE VENOM OF BUNGARUS MULTICINCTUS AND THEIR MODES OF NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING ACTION. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1963 Jul 1;144:241–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cohen M. W. Development of an amphibian neuromuscular junction in vivo and in culture. J Exp Biol. 1980 Dec;89:43–56. doi: 10.1242/jeb.89.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dennis M. J. Development of the neuromuscular junction: inductive interactions between cells. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1981;4:43–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.04.030181.000355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dennis M. J., Miledi R. Electrically induced release of acetylcholine from denervated Schwann cells. J Physiol. 1974 Mar;237(2):431–452. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fambrough D. M., Hartzell H. C. Acetylcholine receptors: number and distribution at neuromuscular junctions in rat diaphragm. Science. 1972 Apr 14;176(4031):189–191. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4031.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Frank E., Fischbach G. D. Early events in neuromuscular junction formation in vitro: induction of acetylcholine receptor clusters in the postsynaptic membrane and morphology of newly formed synapses. J Cell Biol. 1979 Oct;83(1):143–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hall Z. W., Kelly R. B. Enzymatic detachment of endplate acetylcholinesterase from muscle. Nat New Biol. 1971 Jul 14;232(28):62–63. doi: 10.1038/newbio232062a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hepler P. K. The blepharoplast of Marsilea: its de novo formation and spindle association. J Cell Sci. 1976 Jul;21(2):361–390. doi: 10.1242/jcs.21.2.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Heuser J. E., Reese T. S., Landis D. M. Functional changes in frog neuromuscular junctions studied with freeze-fracture. J Neurocytol. 1974 Mar;3(1):109–131. doi: 10.1007/BF01111936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Heuser J. E., Salpeter S. R. Organization of acetylcholine receptors in quick-frozen, deep-etched, and rotary-replicated Torpedo postsynaptic membrane. J Cell Biol. 1979 Jul;82(1):150–173. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.1.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hirokawa N., Heuser J. E. Internal and external differentiations of the postsynaptic membrane at the neuromuscular junction. J Neurocytol. 1982 Jun;11(3):487–510. doi: 10.1007/BF01257990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jacob M., Lentz T. L. Localization of acetylcholine receptors by means of horseradish peroxidase-alpha-bungarotoxin during formation and development of the neuromuscular junction in the chick embryo. J Cell Biol. 1979 Jul;82(1):195–211. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.1.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. KARNOVSKY M. J. THE LOCALIZATION OF CHOLINESTERASE ACTIVITY IN RAT CARDIAC MUSCLE BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. J Cell Biol. 1964 Nov;23:217–232. doi: 10.1083/jcb.23.2.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ko P. K., Anderson M. J., Cohen M. W. Denervated skeletal muscle fibers develop discrete patches of high acetylcholine receptor density. Science. 1977 Apr 29;196(4289):540–542. doi: 10.1126/science.850796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuffler S. W., Yoshikami D. The distribution of acetylcholine sensitivity at the post-synaptic membrane of vertebrate skeletal twitch muscles: iontophoretic mapping in the micron range. J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(3):703–730. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Laurie G. W., Leblond C. P., Martin G. R. Localization of type IV collagen, laminin, heparan sulfate proteoglycan, and fibronectin to the basal lamina of basement membranes. J Cell Biol. 1982 Oct;95(1):340–344. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.1.340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Letinsky M. S., Fischbeck K. H., McMahan U. J. Precision of reinnervation of original postsynaptic sites in frog muscle after a nerve crush. J Neurocytol. 1976 Dec;5(6):691–718. doi: 10.1007/BF01181582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Maeno T. Analysis of mobilization and demobilization processes in neuromuscular transmission in the frog. J Neurophysiol. 1969 Sep;32(5):793–800. doi: 10.1152/jn.1969.32.5.793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Marshall L. M., Sanes J. R., McMahan U. J. Reinnervation of original synaptic sites on muscle fiber basement membrane after disruption of the muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jul;74(7):3073–3077. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.7.3073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Matthews-Bellinger J., Salpeter M. M. Distribution of acetylcholine receptors at frog neuromuscular junctions with a discussion of some physiological implications. J Physiol. 1978 Jun;279:197–213. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. McMahan U. J., Edgington D. R., Kuffler D. P. Factors that influence regeneration of the neuromuscular junction. J Exp Biol. 1980 Dec;89:31–42. doi: 10.1242/jeb.89.1.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McMahan U. J., Sanes J. R., Marshall L. M. Cholinesterase is associated with the basal lamina at the neuromuscular junction. Nature. 1978 Jan 12;271(5641):172–174. doi: 10.1038/271172a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Miledi R., Potter L. T. Acetylcholine receptors in muscle fibres. Nature. 1971 Oct 29;233(5322):599–603. doi: 10.1038/233599a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Moody-Corbett F., Cohen M. W. Localization of cholinesterase at sites of high acetylcholine receptor density on embryonic amphibian muscle cells cultured without nerve. J Neurosci. 1981 Jun;1(6):596–605. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.01-06-00596.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. OTSUKA M., ENDO M., NONOMURA Y. Presynaptic nature of neuromuscular depression. Jpn J Physiol. 1962 Dec 15;12:573–584. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.12.573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Peng H. B., Cheng P. C., Luther P. W. Formation of ACh receptor clusters induced by positively charged latex beads. Nature. 1981 Aug 27;292(5826):831–834. doi: 10.1038/292831a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rennke H. G., Cotran R. S., Venkatachalam M. A. Role of molecular charge in glomerular permeability. Tracer studies with cationized ferritins. J Cell Biol. 1975 Dec;67(3):638–646. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.3.638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sanes J. R., Hall Z. W. Antibodies that bind specifically to synaptic sites on muscle fiber basal lamina. J Cell Biol. 1979 Nov;83(2 Pt 1):357–370. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.2.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sanes J. R. Laminin, fibronectin, and collagen in synaptic and extrasynaptic portions of muscle fiber basement membrane. J Cell Biol. 1982 May;93(2):442–451. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.2.442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sanes J. R., Marshall L. M., McMahan U. J. Reinnervation of muscle fiber basal lamina after removal of myofibers. Differentiation of regenerating axons at original synaptic sites. J Cell Biol. 1978 Jul;78(1):176–198. doi: 10.1083/jcb.78.1.176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Slater C. R. Neural influence on the postnatal changes in acetylcholine receptor distribution at nerve-muscle junctions in the mouse. Dev Biol. 1982 Nov;94(1):23–30. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90064-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Snow M. H. Myogenic cell formation in regenerating rat skeletal muscle injured by mincing. II. An autoradiographic study. Anat Rec. 1977 Jun;188(2):201–217. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091880206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. VENABLE J. H., COGGESHALL R. A SIMPLIFIED LEAD CITRATE STAIN FOR USE IN ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. J Cell Biol. 1965 May;25:407–408. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.2.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Vogel Z., Maloney G. J., Ling A., Daniels M. P. Identification of synaptic acetylcholine receptor sites in retina with peroxidase-labeled alpha-bungarotoxin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Aug;74(8):3268–3272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.8.3268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Vracko R. Basal lamina scaffold-anatomy and significance for maintenance of orderly tissue structure. Am J Pathol. 1974 Nov;77(2):314–346. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wernig A., Pécot-Dechavassine M., Stover H. Sprouting and regression of the nerve at the frog neuromuscular junction in normal conditions and after prolonged paralysis with curare. J Neurocytol. 1980 Jun;9(3):278–303. doi: 10.1007/BF01181538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yee A. G., Fischbach G. D., Karnovsky M. J. Clusters of intramembranous particles on cultured myotubes at sites that are highly sensitive to acetylcholine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jun;75(6):3004–3008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.6.3004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ziskind-Conhaim L., Bennett J. I. The effects of electrical inactivity and denervation on the distribution of acetylcholine receptors in developing rat muscle. Dev Biol. 1982 Mar;90(1):185–197. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90224-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES