Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1984 Nov 1;99(5):1794–1802. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.5.1794

Spatial distribution of DNA loop attachment and replicational sites in the nuclear matrix

PMCID: PMC2113354  PMID: 6490720

Abstract

Biochemical fractionation was combined with high resolution electron microscopic autoradiography to study the localization in rat liver nuclear matrix of attached DNA fragments, in vivo replicated DNA, and in vitro synthesized DNA. In particular, we determined the distribution of these DNA components with the peripheral nuclear lamina versus more internally localized structural elements of isolated nuclear matrix. Autoradiography demonstrated that the bulk of in vivo newly replicated DNA associated with the nuclear matrix (71%) was found within internal matrix regions. A similar interior localization was observed in isolated nuclei and in situ in whole liver tissue. Likewise, isolated nuclear lamina contained only a small amount (12%) of the total matrix- bound, newly replicated DNA. The structural localization of matrix- bound DNA fragments was examined following long-term in vivo labeling of the DNA. The radioactive DNA fragments were found predominantly within interior regions of the matrix structure (77%), and isolated nuclear lamina contained less than 15% of the total nuclear matrix- associated DNA. Most of the endogenous DNA template sites for the replicative enzyme DNA polymerase alpha (approximately 70%) were also sequestered within interior regions of the matrix. In contrast, a majority of the endogenous DNA template sites for DNA polymerase beta (a presumptive repair enzyme) were closely associated with the peripheral nuclear lamina. A similar spatial distribution for both polymerase activities was measured in isolated nuclei before matrix fractionation. Furthermore, isolated nuclear lamina contained only a small proportion of total matrix-bound DNA polymerase alpha endogenous and exogenous template activities (3-12%), but a considerable amount of the corresponding beta polymerase activities (47-52%). Our results support the hypothesis that DNA loops are both anchored and replicated at nuclear matrix-bound sites that are predominantly but not exclusively associated with interior components of the matrix structure. Our results also suggest that the sites of nuclear DNA polymerase beta-driven DNA synthesis are uniquely sequestered within the characteristic peripheral heterochromatin shell and associated nuclear envelope structure, where they may potentially participate in DNA repair and/or replicative functions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adolph K. W. Organization of chromosomes in HeLa cells: isolation of histone-depleted nuclei and nuclear scaffolds. J Cell Sci. 1980 Apr;42:291–304. doi: 10.1242/jcs.42.1.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agutter P. S., Richardson J. C. Nuclear non-chromatin proteinaceous structures: their role in the organization and function of the interphase nucleus. J Cell Sci. 1980 Aug;44:395–435. doi: 10.1242/jcs.44.1.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrack E. R., Coffey D. S. The specific binding of estrogens and androgens to the nuclear matrix of sex hormone responsive tissues. J Biol Chem. 1980 Aug 10;255(15):7265–7275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Basler J., Hastie N. D., Pietras D., Matsui S. I., Sandberg A. A., Berezney R. Hybridization of nuclear matrix attached deoxyribonucleic acid fragments. Biochemistry. 1981 Nov 24;20(24):6921–6929. doi: 10.1021/bi00527a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bekers A. G., Gijzen H. J., Taalman R. D., Wanka F. Ultrastructure of the nuclear matrix from Physarum polycephalum during the mitotic cycle. J Ultrastruct Res. 1981 Jun;75(3):352–362. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(81)80091-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bensch K. G., Tanaka S., Hu S. Z., Wang T. S., Korn D. Intracellular localization of human DNA polymerase alpha with monoclonal antibodies. J Biol Chem. 1982 Jul 25;257(14):8391–8396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benyajati C., Worcel A. Isolation, characterization, and structure of the folded interphase genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 1976 Nov;9(3):393–407. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90084-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berezney R., Buchholtz L. A. Dynamic association of replicating DNA fragments with the nuclear matrix of regenerating liver. Exp Cell Res. 1981 Mar;132(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(81)90076-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Berezney R., Buchholtz L. A. Isolation and characterization of rat liver nuclear matrices containing high molecular weight deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry. 1981 Aug 18;20(17):4995–5002. doi: 10.1021/bi00520a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Berezney R., Coffey D. S. Nuclear matrix. Isolation and characterization of a framework structure from rat liver nuclei. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jun;73(3):616–637. doi: 10.1083/jcb.73.3.616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Berezney R., Coffey D. S. Nuclear protein matrix: association with newly synthesized DNA. Science. 1975 Jul 25;189(4199):291–293. doi: 10.1126/science.1145202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Berezney R., Coffey D. S. The nuclear protein matrix: isolation, structure, and functions. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1976;14:63–100. doi: 10.1016/0065-2571(76)90008-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bhorjee J. S., Barclay S. L., Wedrychowski A., Smith A. M. Monoclonal antibodies specific for tight-binding human chromatin antigens reveal structural rearrangements within the nucleus during the cell cycle. J Cell Biol. 1983 Aug;97(2):389–396. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.2.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bodnar J. W., Jones C. J., Coombs D. H., Pearson G. D., Ward D. C. Proteins tightly bound to HeLa cell DNA at nuclear matrix attachment sites. Mol Cell Biol. 1983 Sep;3(9):1567–1579. doi: 10.1128/mcb.3.9.1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brasch K. Fine structure and localization of the nuclear matrix in situ. Exp Cell Res. 1982 Jul;140(1):161–171. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(82)90167-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Comings D. E., Okada T. A. Nuclear proteins. III. The fibrillar nature of the nuclear matrix. Exp Cell Res. 1976 Dec;103(2):341–360. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90271-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cook P. R., Brazell I. A. Supercoils in human DNA. J Cell Sci. 1975 Nov;19(2):261–279. doi: 10.1242/jcs.19.2.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Deumling B., Franke W. W. Nuclear membranes from mammalian liver, V. On the question of DNA polymerase activities associated with the nuclear envelope. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1972 Mar;353(3):287–297. doi: 10.1515/bchm2.1972.353.1.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dijkwel P. A., Mullenders L. H., Wanka F. Analysis of the attachment of replicating DNA to a nuclear matrix in mammalian interphase nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Jan;6(1):219–230. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.1.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Earnshaw W. C., Laemmli U. K. Architecture of metaphase chromosomes and chromosome scaffolds. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jan;96(1):84–93. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.1.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fakan S., Hancock R. Localization of newly-synthesized DNA in a mammalian cell as visualized by high resolution autoradiography. Exp Cell Res. 1974 Jan;83(1):95–102. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90692-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hartwig M. Organization of mammalian chromosomal DNA: supercoiled and folded circular DNA subunits from interphase cell nuclei. Acta Biol Med Ger. 1978;37(3):421–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huberman J. A., Tsai A., Deich R. A. DNA replication sites within nuclei of mammalian cells. Nature. 1973 Jan 5;241(5384):32–36. doi: 10.1038/241032a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hubert J., Bouvier D., Arnoult J., Bouteille M. Isolation and partial characterization of the nuclear shell of HeLa cells. Exp Cell Res. 1981 Feb;131(2):446–452. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(81)90254-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hunt B. F., Vogelstein B. Association of newly replicated DNA with the nuclear matrix of Physarum polycephalum. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jan 24;9(2):349–363. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.2.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Igó-Kemenes T., Zachau H. G. Domains in chromatin structure. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1978;42(Pt 1):109–118. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1978.042.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jones C., Su R. T. DNA polymerase alpha from the nuclear matrix of cells infected with simian virus 40. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Sep 25;10(18):5517–5532. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.18.5517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaufmann S. H., Coffey D. S., Shaper J. H. Considerations in the isolation of rat liver nuclear matrix, nuclear envelope, and pore complex lamina. Exp Cell Res. 1981 Mar;132(1):105–123. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(81)90088-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kay R. R., Fraser D., Johnston I. R. A method for the rapid isolation of nuclear membranes from rat liver. Characterisation of the membrane preparation and its associated DNA polymerase. Eur J Biochem. 1972 Oct 17;30(1):145–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1972.tb02081.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kay R. R., Haines M. E., Johnston I. R. Late replication of the DNA associated with the nuclear membrane. FEBS Lett. 1971 Sep 1;16(4):233–236. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(71)80358-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Krzyzowska-Gruca S., Zborek A., Gruca S. Distribution of interchromatin granules in nuclear matrices obtained from nuclei exhibiting different degree of chromatin condensation. Cell Tissue Res. 1983;231(2):427–437. doi: 10.1007/BF00222192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. LaFond R. E., Woodcock H., Woodcock C. L., Kundahl E. R., Lucas J. J. Generation of an internal matrix in mature avian erythrocyte nuclei during reactivation in cytoplasts. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jun;96(6):1815–1819. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.6.1815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lafond R. E., Woodcock C. L. Status of the nuclear matrix in mature and embryonic chick erythrocyte nuclei. Exp Cell Res. 1983 Aug;147(1):31–39. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(83)90268-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lebkowski J. S., Laemmli U. K. Evidence for two levels of DNA folding in histone-depleted HeLa interphase nuclei. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 5;156(2):309–324. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90331-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lebkowski J. S., Laemmli U. K. Non-histone proteins and long-range organization of HeLa interphase DNA. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 5;156(2):325–344. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90332-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. McCready S. J., Godwin J., Mason D. W., Brazell I. A., Cook P. R. DNA is replicated at the nuclear cage. J Cell Sci. 1980 Dec;46:365–386. doi: 10.1242/jcs.46.1.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nakane M., Ide T., Anzai K., Ohara S., Andoh T. Supercoiled DNA folded by nonhistone proteins in cultured mouse carcinoma cells. J Biochem. 1978 Jul;84(1):145–157. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a132103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pardoll D. M., Vogelstein B., Coffey D. S. A fixed site of DNA replication in eucaryotic cells. Cell. 1980 Feb;19(2):527–536. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90527-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Paulson J. R., Laemmli U. K. The structure of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):817–828. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90280-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Peacock A. C., Dingman C. W. Molecular weight estimation and separation of ribonucleic acid by electrophoresis in agarose-acrylamide composite gels. Biochemistry. 1968 Feb;7(2):668–674. doi: 10.1021/bi00842a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Piñon R., Salts Y. Isolation of folded chromosomes from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jul;74(7):2850–2854. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.7.2850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Razin S. V., Mantieva V. L., Georgiev G. P. The similarity of DNA sequences remaining bound to scaffold upon nuclease treatment of interphase nuclei and metaphase chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Nov 24;7(6):1713–1735. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.6.1713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Setterfield G., Hall R., Bladon T., Little J., Kaplan J. G. Changes in structure and composition of lymphocyte nuclei during mitogenic stimulation. J Ultrastruct Res. 1983 Mar;82(3):264–282. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(83)80014-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shaper J. H., Pardoll D. M., Kaufmann S. H., Barrack E. R., Vogelstein B., Coffey D. S. The relationship of the nuclear matrix to cellular structure and function. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1978;17:213–248. doi: 10.1016/0065-2571(79)90015-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith H. C., Berezney R. DNA polymerase alpha is tightly bound to the nuclear matrix of actively replicating liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1980 Dec 31;97(4):1541–1547. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(80)80041-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Smith H. C., Berezney R. Dynamic domains of DNA polymerase alpha in regenerating rat liver. Biochemistry. 1983 Jun 21;22(13):3042–3046. doi: 10.1021/bi00282a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Smith H. C., Berezney R. Nuclear matrix-bound deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis: an in vitro system. Biochemistry. 1982 Dec 21;21(26):6751–6761. doi: 10.1021/bi00269a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Stick R., Schwarz H. Disappearance and reformation of the nuclear lamina structure during specific stages of meiosis in oocytes. Cell. 1983 Jul;33(3):949–958. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90038-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Vogelstein B., Pardoll D. M., Coffey D. S. Supercoiled loops and eucaryotic DNA replicaton. Cell. 1980 Nov;22(1 Pt 1):79–85. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90156-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Werner D., Zimmermann H. P., Rauterberg E., Spalinger J. Antibodies to the most tightly bound proteins in eukaryotic DNA. Exp Cell Res. 1981 May;133(1):149–157. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(81)90365-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Williams C. A., Ockey C. H. Distribution of DNA replicator sites in mammalian nuclei after different methods of cell synchronization. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Dec;63(2):365–372. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90224-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wolfe J. A possible skeletal substructure of the macronucleus of Tetrahymena. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jan;84(1):160–171. doi: 10.1083/jcb.84.1.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES