Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1984 Sep 1;99(3):1066–1075. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.3.1066

Rapid rate of tubulin dissociation from microtubules in the mitotic spindle in vivo measured by blocking polymerization with colchicine

PMCID: PMC2113402  PMID: 6470037

Abstract

At metaphase, the amount of tubulin assembled into spindle microtubules is relatively constant; the rate of tubulin association equals the rate of dissociation. To measure the intrinsic rate of dissociation, we microinjected high concentrations of colchicine, or its derivative colcemid, into sea urchin embryos at metaphase to bind the free tubulin, thereby rapidly blocking polymerization. The rate of microtubule disassembly was measured from a calibrated video signal by the change in birefringent retardation (BR). After an initial delay after injection of colchicine or colcemid at final intracellular concentrations of 0.1-3.0 mM, BR decreased rapidly and simultaneously throughout the central spindle and aster. Measured BR in the central half-spindle decreased exponentially to 10% of its initial value within a characteristic period of approximately 20 s; the rate constant, k = 0.11 +/- 0.023 s-1, and the corresponding half-time, t 1/2, of BR decay was approximately 6.5 +/- 1.1 s in this concentration range. Below 0.1 mM colchicine or colcemid, the rate at which BR decreased was concentration dependent. Electron micrographs showed that the rapid decrease in BR corresponded to the disappearance of nonkinetochore microtubules; kinetochore fiber microtubules were differentially stable. As a control, lumicolchicine, which does not bind to tubulin with high affinity, was shown to have no effect on spindle BR at intracellular concentrations of 0.5 mM. If colchicine and colcemid block only polymerization, then the initial rate of tubulin dissociation from nonkinetochore spindle microtubules is in the range of 180-992 dimers per second. This range of rates is based on k = 11% of the initial polymer per second and an estimate from electron micrographs that the average length of a half-spindle microtubule is 1- 5.5 micron. Much slower rates of tubulin association are predicted from the characteristics of end-dependent microtubule assembly measured previously in vitro when the association rate constant is corrected for the lower rate of tubulin diffusion in the embryo cytoplasm. Various possibilities for this discrepancy are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen R. D., Travis J. L., Allen N. S., Yilmaz H. Video-enhanced contrast polarization (AVEC-POL) microscopy: a new method applied to the detection of birefringence in the motile reticulopodial network of Allogromia laticollaris. Cell Motil. 1981;1(3):275–289. doi: 10.1002/cm.970010302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aronson J., Inoué S. Reversal by light of the action of N-methyl N-desacetyl colchicine on mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1970 May;45(2):470–477. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.2.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Banerjee A. C., Bhattacharyya B. Colcemid and colchicine binding to tubulin. Similarity and dissimilarity. FEBS Lett. 1979 Mar 15;99(2):333–336. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(79)80985-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergen L. G., Borisy G. G. Head-to-tail polymerization of microtubules in vitro. Electron microscope analysis of seeded assembly. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jan;84(1):141–150. doi: 10.1083/jcb.84.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergen L. G., Borisy G. G. Tubulin-colchicine complex inhibits microtubule elongation at both plus and minus ends. J Biol Chem. 1983 Apr 10;258(7):4190–4194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Binder L. I., Dentler W. L., Rosenbaum J. L. Assembly of chick brain tubulin onto flagellar microtubules from Chlamydomonas and sea urchin sperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Mar;72(3):1122–1126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.3.1122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonder E. M., Mooseker M. S. Direct electron microscopic visualization of barbed end capping and filament cutting by intestinal microvillar 95-kdalton protein (villin): a new actin assembly assay using the Limulus acrosomal process. J Cell Biol. 1983 Apr;96(4):1097–1107. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.4.1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Borisy G. G. Polarity of microtubules of the mitotic spindle. J Mol Biol. 1978 Sep 25;124(3):565–570. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90188-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Borisy G. G., Taylor E. W. The mechanism of action of colchicine. Colchicine binding to sea urchin eggs and the mitotic apparatus. J Cell Biol. 1967 Aug;34(2):535–548. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.2.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Burnside B., Kozak C., Kafatos F. C. Tubulin determination by an isotope dilution-vinblastine precipitation method. The tubulin content of Spisula eggs and embryos. J Cell Biol. 1973 Dec;59(3):755–762. doi: 10.1083/jcb.59.3.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carlier M. F., Hill T. L., Chen Y. Interference of GTP hydrolysis in the mechanism of microtubule assembly: an experimental study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Feb;81(3):771–775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.3.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen W. D., Rebhun L. I. An estimate of the amount of microtubule protein in the isolated mitotic apparatus. J Cell Sci. 1970 Jan;6(1):159–176. doi: 10.1242/jcs.6.1.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Deery W. J., Weisenberg R. C. Kinetic and steady-state analysis of microtubules in the presence of colchicine. Biochemistry. 1981 Apr 14;20(8):2316–2324. doi: 10.1021/bi00511a038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Detrich H. W., 3rd, Wilson L. Purification, characterization, and assembly properties of tubulin from unfertilized eggs of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Biochemistry. 1983 May 10;22(10):2453–2462. doi: 10.1021/bi00279a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Erickson H. P., Pantaloni D. The role of subunit entropy in cooperative assembly. Nucleation of microtubules and other two-dimensional polymers. Biophys J. 1981 May;34(2):293–309. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84850-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Euteneuer U., Jackson W. T., McIntosh J. R. Polarity of spindle microtubules in Haemanthus endosperm. J Cell Biol. 1982 Sep;94(3):644–653. doi: 10.1083/jcb.94.3.644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Euteneuer U., McIntosh J. R. Structural polarity of kinetochore microtubules in PtK1 cells. J Cell Biol. 1981 May;89(2):338–345. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.2.338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Farrell K. W., Himes R. H., Jordan M. A., Wilson L. On the nonlinear relationship between the initial rates of dilution-induced microtubule disassembly and the initial free subunit concentration. J Biol Chem. 1983 Dec 10;258(23):14148–14156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Farrell K. W., Jordan M. A. A kinetic analysis of assembly-disassembly at opposite microtubule ends. J Biol Chem. 1982 Mar 25;257(6):3131–3138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Flavin M., Slaughter C. Microtubule assembly and function in Chlamydomonas: inhibition of growth and flagellar regeneration by antitubulins and other drugs and isolation of resistant mutants. J Bacteriol. 1974 Apr;118(1):59–69. doi: 10.1128/jb.118.1.59-69.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fuge H. Ultrastructure of the mitotic spindle. Int Rev Cytol Suppl. 1977;(6):1–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fuseler J. W. Temperature dependence of anaphase chromosome velocity and microtubule depolymerization. J Cell Biol. 1975 Dec;67(3):789–800. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.3.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Haber J. E., Peloquin J. G., Halvorson H. O., Borisy G. G. Colcemid inhibition of cell growth and the characterization of a colcemid-binding activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1972 Nov;55(2):355–367. doi: 10.1083/jcb.55.2.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Harris P. The role of membranes in the ogranization of the mitotic apparatus. Exp Cell Res. 1975 Sep;94(2):409–425. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(75)90507-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hill T. L., Kirschner M. W. Bioenergetics and kinetics of microtubule and actin filament assembly-disassembly. Int Rev Cytol. 1982;78:1–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hiller G., Weber K. Radioimmunoassay for tubulin: a quantitative comparison of the tubulin content of different established tissue culture cells and tissues. Cell. 1978 Aug;14(4):795–804. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90335-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hiramoto Y. A method of microinjection. Exp Cell Res. 1974 Aug;87(2):403–406. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90503-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hiramoto Y., Hamaguchi Y., Shóji Y., Schroeder T. E., Shimoda S., Nakamura S. Quantitative studies on the polarization optical properties of living cells II. The role of microtubules in birefringence of the spindle of the sea urchin egg. J Cell Biol. 1981 Apr;89(1):121–130. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.1.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hoebeke J., Van Nijen G., De Brabander M. Interaction of oncodazole (R 17934), a new antitumoral drug, with rat brain tubulin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976 Mar 22;69(2):319–324. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(76)90524-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Inoué S., Fuseler J., Salmon E. D., Ellis G. W. Functional organization of mitotic microtubules. Physical chemistry of the in vivo equilibrium system. Biophys J. 1975 Jul;15(7):725–744. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(75)85850-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Inoué S., Sato H. Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):259–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Johnson K. A., Borisy G. G. Kinetic analysis of microtubule self-assembly in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1977 Nov 25;117(1):1–31. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90020-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Karr T. L., Kristofferson D., Purich D. L. Calcium ion induces endwise depolymerization of bovine brain microtubules. J Biol Chem. 1980 Dec 25;255(24):11853–11856. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Karr T. L., Kristofferson D., Purich D. L. Mechanism of microtubule depolymerization. Correlation of rapid induced disassembly experiments with a kinetic model for endwise depolymerization. J Biol Chem. 1980 Sep 25;255(18):8560–8566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Keller T. C., 3rd, Rebhun L. I. Strongylocentrotus purpuratus spindle tubulin. I. Characteristics of its polymerization and depolymerization in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;93(3):788–796. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.3.788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kiehart D. P. Studies on the in vivo sensitivity of spindle microtubules to calcium ions and evidence for a vesicular calcium-sequestering system. J Cell Biol. 1981 Mar;88(3):604–617. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.3.604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Koren R., Hammes G. G. A kinetic study of protein-protein interactions. Biochemistry. 1976 Mar 9;15(5):1165–1171. doi: 10.1021/bi00650a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kreis T. E., Geiger B., Schlessinger J. Mobility of microinjected rhodamine actin within living chicken gizzard cells determined by fluorescence photobleaching recovery. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):835–845. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90445-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Margolis R. L., Wilson L. Addition of colchicine--tubulin complex to microtubule ends: the mechanism of substoichiometric colchicine poisoning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Aug;74(8):3466–3470. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.8.3466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Margolis R. L., Wilson L. Microtubule treadmills--possible molecular machinery. Nature. 1981 Oct 29;293(5835):705–711. doi: 10.1038/293705a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Moll E., Manz B., Mocikat S., Zimmermann H. P. Fluorescent deacetylcolchicine. New aspects of its activity and localization in PtK-1 cells. Exp Cell Res. 1982 Sep;141(1):211–220. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(82)90083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Murphy D. B., Johnson K. A., Borisy G. G. Role of tubulin-associated proteins in microtubule nucleation and elongation. J Mol Biol. 1977 Nov 25;117(1):33–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90021-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pfeffer T. A., Asnes C. F., Wilson L. Properties of tubulin in unfertilized sea urchin eggs. Quantitation and characterization by the colchicine-binding reaction. J Cell Biol. 1976 Jun;69(3):599–607. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.3.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Raff R. A., Greenhouse G., Gross K. W., Gross P. R. Synthesis and storage of microtubule proteins by sea urchin embryos. J Cell Biol. 1971 Aug;50(2):516–527. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.2.516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Raff R. A., Kaumeyer J. F. Soluble microtubule proteins of the sea urchin embryo: partial characterization of the proteins and behavior of the pool in early development. Dev Biol. 1973 Jun;32(2):309–320. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90243-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rieder C. L. The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int Rev Cytol. 1982;79:1–58. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61672-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sakai H. The isolated mitotic apparatus and chromosome motion. Int Rev Cytol. 1978;55:22–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Salmon E. D., Begg D. A. Functional implications of cold-stable microtubules in kinetochore fibers of insect spermatocytes during anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jun;85(3):853–865. doi: 10.1083/jcb.85.3.853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Salmon E. D., Ellis G. W. Compensator transducer increases ease, accuracy, and rapidity of measuring changes in specimen birefringence with polarization microscopy. J Microsc. 1976 Jan;106(1):63–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1976.tb02384.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Salmon E. D. Mitotic spindles isolated from sea urchin eggs with EGTA lysis buffers. Methods Cell Biol. 1982;25(Pt B):69–105. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61421-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Salmon E. D., Segall R. R. Calcium-labile mitotic spindles isolated from sea urchin eggs (Lytechinus variegatus). J Cell Biol. 1980 Aug;86(2):355–365. doi: 10.1083/jcb.86.2.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Salmon E. D. Spindle microtubules: thermodynamics of in vivo assembly and role in chromosome movement. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;253:383–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb19216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Salmon E. D., Wolniak S. M. Taxol stabilization of mitotic spindle microtubules: analysis using calcium-induced depolymerization. Cell Motil. 1984;4(3):155–167. doi: 10.1002/cm.970040302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sato H., Ellis G. W., Inoué S. Microtubular origin of mitotic spindle form birefringence. Demonstration of the applicability of Wiener's equation. J Cell Biol. 1975 Dec;67(3):501–517. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.3.501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Schiff P. B., Horwitz S. B. Taxol assembles tubulin in the absence of exogenous guanosine 5'-triphosphate or microtubule-associated proteins. Biochemistry. 1981 May 26;20(11):3247–3252. doi: 10.1021/bi00514a041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sluder G. Experimental manipulation of the amount of tubulin available for assembly into the spindle of dividing sea urchin eggs. J Cell Biol. 1976 Jul;70(1):75–85. doi: 10.1083/jcb.70.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sluder G. Role of spindle microtubules in the control of cell cycle timing. J Cell Biol. 1979 Mar;80(3):674–691. doi: 10.1083/jcb.80.3.674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Stephens R. E. A thermodynamic analysis of mitotic spindle equilibrium at active metaphase. J Cell Biol. 1973 Apr;57(1):133–147. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sternlicht H., Ringel I. Colchicine inhibition of microtubule assembly via copolymer formation. J Biol Chem. 1979 Oct 25;254(20):10540–10550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Summers K., Kirschner M. W. Characteristics of the polar assembly and disassembly of microtubules observed in vitro by darkfield light microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1979 Oct;83(1):205–217. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.1.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Telzer B. R., Haimo L. T. Decoration of spindle microtubules with Dynein: evidence for uniform polarity. J Cell Biol. 1981 May;89(2):373–378. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.2.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang Y. L., Lanni F., McNeil P. L., Ware B. R., Taylor D. L. Mobility of cytoplasmic and membrane-associated actin in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(15):4660–4664. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.15.4660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wilson L., Meza I. The mechanism of action of colchicine. Colchicine binding properties of sea urchin sperm tail outer doublet tubulin. J Cell Biol. 1973 Sep;58(3):709–719. doi: 10.1083/jcb.58.3.709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wojcieszyn J. W., Schlegel R. A., Wu E. S., Jacobson K. A. Diffusion of injected macromolecules within the cytoplasm of living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jul;78(7):4407–4410. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.7.4407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zeeberg B., Reid R., Caplow M. Incorporation of radioactive tubulin into microtubules at steady state. Experimental and theoretical analyses of diffusional and directional flux. J Biol Chem. 1980 Oct 25;255(20):9891–9899. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES