Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1985 Mar 1;100(3):736–747. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.3.736

Rates of diffusion of fluorescent molecules via cell-to-cell membrane channels in a developing tissue

PMCID: PMC2113529  PMID: 3972892

Abstract

Diffusion coefficients for the intercellular movement of fluorescent tracers have been measured in the epidermis of a larval beetle. Fluorescent tracer was injected into a cell and the spread of tracer from cell to cell in this monolayer was recorded by a TV camera. Fluorescence intensities were digitized from the TV images at successive times after the start of injection at various distances from the source by a microcomputer interfaced with a video analyzer. From the relationship between concentration (measured as light intensity), time and distance, an effective diffusion coefficient (De) is calculated for the tracer in the tissue. In newly ecdysed epidermis, De for carboxyfluorescein (CF) is 2.7 X 10(-7) cm2/s, and De for lissamine rhodamine B (LRB) is 1.2 X 10(-7) cm2/s, whereas in intermolt epidermis the De's for CF and LRB are 3.7 X 10(-7) and 1.2 X 10(-7) cm2/s, respectively. These diffusion coefficients are only an order of magnitude lower than their values in water. The ratio of De for the two tracers at these two stages of development differs from the ratio predicted in cytoplasm alone, with the movement of the slightly larger molecule (LRB) being impeded relative to that of the smaller molecule (CF). This suggests that the properties of the membrane channels amplify differences in the rates of movement of molecules of similar size. This may be important during cell patterning in development. De for CF was also monitored as junctional resistance was increased in the epidermis. During 30 min of exposure to 0.25 mM chlorpromazine, De dropped to 20% of its initial value of 5 X 10(-7) cm2/s, implying that the junctional membrane, rather than cytoplasm, is the major barrier to molecular diffusion among the cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brink P. R., Dewey M. M. Nexal membrane permeability to anions. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Jul;72(1):67–86. doi: 10.1085/jgp.72.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caveney S. Intercellular communication in insect development is hormonally controlled. Science. 1978 Jan 13;199(4325):192–195. doi: 10.1126/science.202023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caveney S., Podgorski C. Intercellular communication in a positional field. Ultrastructural correlates and tracer analysis of communication between insect epidermal cells. Tissue Cell. 1975;7(3):559–574. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(75)90026-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crick F. Diffusion in embryogenesis. Nature. 1970 Jan 31;225(5231):420–422. doi: 10.1038/225420a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Mello W. C. Effect of 2-4-dinitrophenol on intercellular communication in mammalian cardiac fibres. Pflugers Arch. 1979 Jul;380(3):267–276. doi: 10.1007/BF00582905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellis C. G., Safranyos R. G., Groom A. C. Television-computer method for in vivo measurement of capillary diameter, based on the passage of red cells. Microvasc Res. 1983 Sep;26(2):139–150. doi: 10.1016/0026-2862(83)90065-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Flagg-Newton J., Simpson I., Loewenstein W. R. Permeability of the cell-to-cell membrane channels in mammalian cell juncton. Science. 1979 Jul 27;205(4404):404–407. doi: 10.1126/science.377490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Imanaga I. Cell-to-cell diffusion of procion yellow in sheep and calf Purkinje fibers. J Membr Biol. 1974;16(4):381–388. doi: 10.1007/BF01872425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Inoué S. Video image processing greatly enhances contrast, quality, and speed in polarization-based microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1981 May;89(2):346–356. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.2.346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lacalli T. C., Harrison L. G. Turing's conditions and the analysis of morphogenetic models. J Theor Biol. 1979 Feb 21;76(4):419–436. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(79)90011-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lees-Miller J. P., Caveney S. Drugs that block calmoduLin activity inhibit cell-to-cell coupling in the epidermis of Tenebrio molitor. J Membr Biol. 1982;69(3):233–245. doi: 10.1007/BF01870402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lo C. W., Gilula N. B. Gap junctional communication in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Cell. 1979 Oct;18(2):399–409. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90059-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Loewenstein W. R. Junctional intercellular communication and the control of growth. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Feb 4;560(1):1–65. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(79)90002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Loewenstein W. R. Junctional intercellular communication: the cell-to-cell membrane channel. Physiol Rev. 1981 Oct;61(4):829–913. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1981.61.4.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Meinhardt H., Gierer A. Applications of a theory of biological pattern formation based on lateral inhibition. J Cell Sci. 1974 Jul;15(2):321–346. doi: 10.1242/jcs.15.2.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Michalke W. A gradient of diffusible substance in a monolayer of cultured cells. J Membr Biol. 1977 May 6;33(1-2):1–20. doi: 10.1007/BF01869509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Murray J. D. Parameter space for turing instability in reaction diffusion mechanisms: a comparison of models. J Theor Biol. 1982 Sep 7;98(1):143–163. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90063-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nicholson C., Phillips J. M. Ion diffusion modified by tortuosity and volume fraction in the extracellular microenvironment of the rat cerebellum. J Physiol. 1981 Dec;321:225–257. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Petersen N. O., McConnaughey W. B. Effects of multiple membranes on measurements of cell surface dynamics by fluorescence photobleaching. J Supramol Struct Cell Biochem. 1981;17(3):213–221. doi: 10.1002/jsscb.380170303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pollack G. H. Intercellular coupling in the atrioventricular node and other tissues of the rabbit heart. J Physiol. 1976 Feb;255(1):275–298. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rose B., Loewenstein W. R. Permeability of a cell junction and the local cytoplasmic free ionized calcium concentration: a study with aequorin. J Membr Biol. 1976 Aug 27;28(1):87–119. doi: 10.1007/BF01869692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rose B., Simpson I., Loewenstein W. R. Calcium ion produces graded changes in permeability of membrane channels in cell junction. Nature. 1977 Jun 16;267(5612):625–627. doi: 10.1038/267625a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Spray D. C., Harris A. L., Bennett M. V. Gap junctional conductance is a simple and sensitive function of intracellular pH. Science. 1981 Feb 13;211(4483):712–715. doi: 10.1126/science.6779379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Spray D. C., Harris A. L., Bennett M. V. Voltage dependence of junctional conductance in early amphibian embryos. Science. 1979 Apr 27;204(4391):432–434. doi: 10.1126/science.312530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Taylor D. L., Condeelis J. S. Cytoplasmic structure and contractility in amoeboid cells. Int Rev Cytol. 1979;56:57–144. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61821-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tsien R. W., Weingart R. Inotropic effect of cyclic AMP in calf ventricular muscle studied by a cut end method. J Physiol. 1976 Aug;260(1):117–141. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang Y. L., Lanni F., McNeil P. L., Ware B. R., Taylor D. L. Mobility of cytoplasmic and membrane-associated actin in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(15):4660–4664. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.15.4660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Warner A. E., Lawrence P. A. Permeability of gap junctions at the segmental border in insect epidermis. Cell. 1982 Feb;28(2):243–252. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90342-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Weidmann S. The diffusion of radiopotassium across intercalated disks of mammalian cardiac muscle. J Physiol. 1966 Nov;187(2):323–342. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Weingart R. The permeability to tetraethylammonium ions of the surface membrane and the intercalated disks of sheep and calf myocardium. J Physiol. 1974 Aug;240(3):741–762. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Weir M. P., Lo C. W. Gap junctional communication compartments in the Drosophila wing disk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 May;79(10):3232–3235. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.10.3232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Willingham M. C., Pastan I. The visualization of fluorescent proteins in living cells by video intensification microscopy (VIM). Cell. 1978 Mar;13(3):501–507. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90323-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wolpert L. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J Theor Biol. 1969 Oct;25(1):1–47. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(69)80016-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES