Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1984 Dec 1;99(6):2157–2164. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2157

Diffusion coefficient of fluorescein-labeled tubulin in the cytoplasm of embryonic cells of a sea urchin: video image analysis of fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching

PMCID: PMC2113538  PMID: 6501417

Abstract

The diffusion coefficient of tubulin has been measured in the cytoplasm of eggs and embryos of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. We have used brain tubulin, conjugated to dichlorotriazinyl-aminofluorescein, to inject eggs and embryos. The resulting distributions of fluorescence were perturbed by bleaching with a microbeam of light from the 488-nm line of an argon ion laser. Fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching was monitored with a sensitive video camera and photography of the television-generated image. With standard photometric methods, we have calibrated this recording system and measured the rates of fluorescence redistribution for tubulin, conjugated to dichlorotriazinyl-aminofluorescein, not incorporated into the mitotic spindle. The diffusion coefficient (D) was calculated from these data using Fick's second law of diffusion and a digital method for analysis of the photometric curves. We have tested our method by determining D for bovine serum albumin (BSA) under conditions where the value is already known and by measuring D for fluorescein-labeled BSA in sea urchin eggs with a standard apparatus for monitoring fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching. The values agree to within experimental error. Dcytoplasmtubulin = 5.9 +/- 2.2 X 10(-8) cm2/s; DcytoplasmBSA = 8.6 +/- 2.0 X 10(-8) cm2/s. Because DH2OBSA = 68 X 10(-8) cm2/s, these data suggest that the viscosity of sea urchin cytoplasm for protein is about eight times that of water and that most of the tubulin of the sea urchin cytoplasm exists as a dimer or small oligomer, which is unbound to structures that would impede its diffusion. Values and limitations of our method are discussed, and we draw attention to both the variations in D for single proteins in different cells and the importance of D for the upper limit to the rates of polymerization reactions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Axelrod D., Koppel D. E., Schlessinger J., Elson E., Webb W. W. Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys J. 1976 Sep;16(9):1055–1069. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85755-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barisas B. G., Leuther M. D. Fluorescence photobleaching recovery measurement of protein absolute diffusion constants. Biophys Chem. 1979 Sep;10(2):221–229. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(79)85044-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. De Brabander M., Geuens G., Nuydens R., Willebrords R., De Mey J. Microtubule assembly in living cells after release from nocodazole block: the effects of metabolic inhibitors, taxol and PH. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1981 Sep;5(9):913–920. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(81)90206-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hill T. L., Kirschner M. W. Regulation of microtubule and actin filament assembly--disassembly by associated small and large molecules. Int Rev Cytol. 1983;84:185–234. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61018-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jacobson K., Derzko Z., Wu E. S., Hou Y., Poste G. Measurement of the lateral mobility of cell surface components in single, living cells by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. J Supramol Struct. 1976;5(4):565(417)–576(428). doi: 10.1002/jss.400050411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jacobson K., Elson E., Koppel D., Webb W. International workshop on the application of fluorescence photobleaching techniques to problems in cell biology. Fed Proc. 1983 Jan;42(1):72–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jacobson K., Wu E., Poste G. Measurement of the translational mobility of concanavalin A in glycerol-saline solutions and on the cell surface by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Apr 16;433(1):215–222. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90189-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Keith C. H., Feramisco J. R., Shelanski M. Direct visualization of fluorescein-labeled microtubules in vitro and in microinjected fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jan;88(1):234–240. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.1.234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kiehart D. P. Studies on the in vivo sensitivity of spindle microtubules to calcium ions and evidence for a vesicular calcium-sequestering system. J Cell Biol. 1981 Mar;88(3):604–617. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.3.604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Koren R., Hammes G. G. A kinetic study of protein-protein interactions. Biochemistry. 1976 Mar 9;15(5):1165–1171. doi: 10.1021/bi00650a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kreis T. E., Birchmeier W. Microinjection of fluorescently labeled proteins into living cells with emphasis on cytoskeletal proteins. Int Rev Cytol. 1982;75:209–214. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61005-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kreis T. E., Geiger B., Schlessinger J. Mobility of microinjected rhodamine actin within living chicken gizzard cells determined by fluorescence photobleaching recovery. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):835–845. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90445-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Leslie R. J., Saxton W. M., Mitchison T. J., Neighbors B., Salmon E. D., McIntosh J. R. Assembly properties of fluorescein-labeled tubulin in vitro before and after fluorescence bleaching. J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2146–2156. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Margolis R. L., Wilson L. Microtubule treadmills--possible molecular machinery. Nature. 1981 Oct 29;293(5835):705–711. doi: 10.1038/293705a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Salmon E. D., McKeel M., Hays T. Rapid rate of tubulin dissociation from microtubules in the mitotic spindle in vivo measured by blocking polymerization with colchicine. J Cell Biol. 1984 Sep;99(3):1066–1075. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.3.1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Salmon E. D. Spindle microtubules: thermodynamics of in vivo assembly and role in chromosome movement. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;253:383–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb19216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang Y. L., Lanni F., McNeil P. L., Ware B. R., Taylor D. L. Mobility of cytoplasmic and membrane-associated actin in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(15):4660–4664. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.15.4660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weingarten M. D., Suter M. M., Littman D. R., Kirschner M. W. Properties of the depolymerization products of microtubules from mammalian brain. Biochemistry. 1974 Dec 31;13(27):5529–5537. doi: 10.1021/bi00724a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wojcieszyn J. W., Schlegel R. A., Wu E. S., Jacobson K. A. Diffusion of injected macromolecules within the cytoplasm of living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jul;78(7):4407–4410. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.7.4407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES