Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1984 Dec 1;99(6):1944–1954. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.1944

Phenotypic changes and loss of N-CAM-mediated adhesion in transformed embryonic chicken retinal cells

PMCID: PMC2113542  PMID: 6094590

Abstract

Transformation of 6-d-old embryonic chicken retinal cells by Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) was found to cause significant changes in several cellular properties including adhesiveness, motility, and state of differentiation. The alterations in cell adhesivity were analyzed by means of specific antibodies to the calcium-independent neural cell adhesion molecule, N-CAM. In the RSV-transformed cells the amount of N- CAM present at the cell surface was significantly decreased relative to normal cells, as assessed by immunofluorescent staining, specific immunoprecipitation, and immunoblotting experiments. This decrease was reflected in a marked reduction in N-CAM-mediated adhesiveness measured in vitro. A different, calcium-dependent, adhesive system also present on neurons was not detectably altered by RSV transformation and, in contrast with previous studies on normal neurons, this adhesive system was detected without treatment by proteases. In culture, the transformed cells formed fewer and less compact colonies than the normal retinal cells. Observation of the RSV-transformed retinal cells by time-lapse cinematography confirmed the reduction in adhesiveness and also revealed that the transformed cells were more highly motile than their normal counterparts. In addition, RSV transformation appeared to alter the differentiation of the cultured retinal cells. Immunofluorescent staining studies indicated that in contrast to mature neurons, transformed neural retinal cells expressed the 34,000-mol-wt tyrosine kinase substrate and reduced amounts of a neuron-specific ganglioside recognized by monoclonal antibody A2B5. These characteristics are shared by untransformed glial cells. In double immunofluorescent staining experiments, many cells expressed both N-CAM and pp60src shortly after viral infection, which implies that the N-CAM- positive neuroepithelial cells were transformed by RSV. In addition, a highly purified population of N-CAM-positive neural retinal cells, selected using a fluorescence-activated cell sorter, was rapidly and extensively transformed by RSV at rates comparable to those of the unfractionated population. These results established that the transformed cells were largely derived from RSV-infected neuroepithelial cells rather than from a small population of retinal glial cells present in the primary culture. The findings suggest reconsideration of the possible origin of tumors classified by morphological criteria as derived from glia and raise the possibility that the normal homologue of pp60src may play a role in the commitment of neuroepithelial cells to neuronal or glial differentiation pathways.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adler R., Magistretti P. J., Hyndman A. G., Shoemaker W. J. Purification and cytochemical identification of neuronal and non-neuronal cells in chick embryo retina cultures. Dev Neurosci. 1982;5(1):27–39. doi: 10.1159/000112659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alitalo K., Vaheri A. Pericellular matrix in malignant transformation. Adv Cancer Res. 1982;37:111–158. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60883-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boettiger D., Roby K., Brumbaugh J., Biehl J., Holtzer H. Transformation of chicken embryo retinal melanoblasts by a temperature-sensitive mutant of Rous sarcoma virus. Cell. 1977 Aug;11(4):881–890. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90299-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brackenbury R., Rutishauser U., Edelman G. M. Distinct calcium-independent and calcium-dependent adhesion systems of chicken embryo cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):387–391. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brackenbury R., Thiery J. P., Rutishauser U., Edelman G. M. Adhesion among neural cells of the chick embryo. I. An immunological assay for molecules involved in cell-cell binding. J Biol Chem. 1977 Oct 10;252(19):6835–6840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Calothy G., Poirier F., Dambrine G., Mignatti P., Combes P., Pessac B. Expression of viral oncogenes in differentiating chick embryo neuroretinal cells infected with avian tumor viruses. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1980;44(Pt 2):983–990. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1980.044.01.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cassiman J. J., Bernfield M. R. Transformation-induced alterations in fibroblast adhesion: masking by trypsin treatment. Exp Cell Res. 1975 Mar 1;91(1):31–35. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(75)90137-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chamberlain J. P. Fluorographic detection of radioactivity in polyacrylamide gels with the water-soluble fluor, sodium salicylate. Anal Biochem. 1979 Sep 15;98(1):132–135. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90716-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chuong C. M., McClain D. A., Streit P., Edelman G. M. Neural cell adhesion molecules in rodent brains isolated by monoclonal antibodies with cross-species reactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jul;79(13):4234–4238. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.13.4234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cole G. J., Glaser L. Inhibition of embryonic neural retina cell-substratum adhesion with a monoclonal antibody. J Biol Chem. 1984 Apr 10;259(7):4031–4034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Combes P. C., Privat A., Pessac B., Calothy G. Differentiation of chick embryo neuroretina cells in monolayer cultures. An ultrastructural study. I. Seven-day retina. Cell Tissue Res. 1977 Dec 13;185(2):159–173. doi: 10.1007/BF00220661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cotton P. C., Brugge J. S. Neural tissues express high levels of the cellular src gene product pp60c-src. Mol Cell Biol. 1983 Jun;3(6):1157–1162. doi: 10.1128/mcb.3.6.1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cunningham B. A., Hoffman S., Rutishauser U., Hemperly J. J., Edelman G. M. Molecular topography of the neural cell adhesion molecule N-CAM: surface orientation and location of sialic acid-rich and binding regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 May;80(10):3116–3120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.10.3116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. EPHRUSSI B., TEMIN H. M. Infection of chick iris epithelium with the Rous sarcoma virus in vitro. Virology. 1960 Jul;11:547–552. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(60)90099-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Edelman G. M. Cell adhesion molecules. Science. 1983 Feb 4;219(4584):450–457. doi: 10.1126/science.6823544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Edelman G. M., Chuong C. M. Embryonic to adult conversion of neural cell adhesion molecules in normal and staggerer mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Nov;79(22):7036–7040. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.22.7036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Edelman G. M., Hoffman S., Chuong C. M., Thiery J. P., Brackenbury R., Gallin W. J., Grumet M., Greenberg M. E., Hemperly J. J., Cohen C. Structure and modulation of neural cell adhesion molecules in early and late embryogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;48(Pt 2):515–526. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.048.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Edelman G. M. Modulation of cell adhesion during induction, histogenesis, and perinatal development of the nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1984;7:339–377. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.07.030184.002011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Edwards J. G., Campbell J. A., Williams J. F. Transformation of polyoma virus affects adhesion of fibroblasts. Nat New Biol. 1971 Jun 2;231(22):147–148. doi: 10.1038/newbio231147a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Edwards J. G., Dysart J. M., Edgar D. H., Robson R. T. On the reduced intercellular adhesiveness of virally transformed BHK21 cells. J Cell Sci. 1979 Feb;35:307–320. doi: 10.1242/jcs.35.1.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Eisenbarth G. S., Walsh F. S., Nirenberg M. Monoclonal antibody to a plasma membrane antigen of neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):4913–4917. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.4913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fidler I. J., Gersten D. M., Hart I. R. The biology of cancer invasion and metastasis. Adv Cancer Res. 1978;28:149–250. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60648-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fiszman M. Y., Fuchs P. Temperature-sensitive expression of differentiation in transformed myoblasts. Nature. 1975 Apr 3;254(5499):429–431. doi: 10.1038/254429a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Greenberg M. E., Brackenbury R., Edelman G. M. Alteration of neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) expression after neuronal cell transformation by Rous sarcoma virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Feb;81(3):969–973. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.3.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Greenberg M. E., Edelman G. M. Comparison of the 34,000-Da pp60src substrate and a 38,000-Da phosphoprotein identified by monoclonal antibodies. J Biol Chem. 1983 Jul 10;258(13):8497–8502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Grumet M., Edelman G. M. Heterotypic binding between neuronal membrane vesicles and glial cells is mediated by a specific cell adhesion molecule. J Cell Biol. 1984 May;98(5):1746–1756. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.5.1746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Grumet M., Hoffman S., Edelman G. M. Two antigenically related neuronal cell adhesion molecules of different specificities mediate neuron-neuron and neuron-glia adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jan;81(1):267–271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.1.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Grunwald G. B., Geller R. L., Lilien J. Enzymatic dissection of embryonic cell adhesive mechanisms. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jun;85(3):766–776. doi: 10.1083/jcb.85.3.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Halpern B., Pejsachowicz B., Febvre H. L., Barski G. Differences in patterns of aggregation of malignant and non-malignant mammalian cells. Nature. 1966 Jan 8;209(5019):157–159. doi: 10.1038/209157a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hanafusa H. Rapid transformation of cells by Rous sarcoma virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Jun;63(2):318–325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.63.2.318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hoffman S., Edelman G. M. Kinetics of homophilic binding by embryonic and adult forms of the neural cell adhesion molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Sep;80(18):5762–5766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.18.5762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hoffman S., Sorkin B. C., White P. C., Brackenbury R., Mailhammer R., Rutishauser U., Cunningham B. A., Edelman G. M. Chemical characterization of a neural cell adhesion molecule purified from embryonic brain membranes. J Biol Chem. 1982 Jul 10;257(13):7720–7729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Holtzer H., Biehl J., Yeoh G., Meganathan R., Kaji A. Effect of oncogenic virus on muscle differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Oct;72(10):4051–4055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.10.4051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kasai N., Yu R. K. The monoclonal antibody A2B5 is specific to ganglioside GQ1c. Brain Res. 1983 Oct 24;277(1):155–158. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90918-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lemmon V., Staros E. B., Perry H. E., Gottlieb D. I. A monoclonal antibody which binds to the surface of chick brain cells and myotubes: cell selectivity and properties of the antigen. Brain Res. 1982 Mar;255(3):349–360. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(82)90003-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lipsich L. A., Lewis A. J., Brugge J. S. Isolation of monoclonal antibodies that recognize the transforming proteins of avian sarcoma viruses. J Virol. 1983 Nov;48(2):352–360. doi: 10.1128/jvi.48.2.352-360.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Magnani J. L., Thomas W. A., Steinberg M. S. Two distinct adhesion mechanisms in embryonic neural retina cells. I. A kinetic analysis. Dev Biol. 1981 Jan 15;81(1):96–105. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90351-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Maness P. F., Engeser H., Greenberg M. E., O'Farrell M., Gall W. E., Edelman G. M. Characterization of the protein kinase activity of avian sarcoma virus src gene product. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5028–5032. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Meller K., Tetzlaff W. Scanning electron microscopic studies on the development of the chick retina. Cell Tissue Res. 1976 Jul 26;170(2):145–159. doi: 10.1007/BF00224296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nicolson G. L., Winkelhake J. L. Organ specificity of blood-borne tumour metastasis determined by cell adhesion? Nature. 1975 May 15;255(5505):230–232. doi: 10.1038/255230a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pacifici M., Boettiger D., Roby K., Holtzer H. Transformation of chondroblasts by Rous sarcoma virus and synthesis of the sulfated proteoglycan matrix. Cell. 1977 Aug;11(4):891–899. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90300-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Poirier F., Calothy G., Karess R. E., Erikson E., Hanafusa H. Role of p60src kinase activity in the induction of neuroretinal cell proliferation by rous sarcoma virus. J Virol. 1982 Jun;42(3):780–789. doi: 10.1128/jvi.42.3.780-789.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rothbard J. B., Brackenbury R., Cunningham B. A., Edelman G. M. Differences in the carbohydrate structures of neural cell-adhesion molecules from adult and embryonic chicken brains. J Biol Chem. 1982 Sep 25;257(18):11064–11069. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rougon G., Deagostini-Bazin H., Hirn M., Goridis C. Tissue- and developmental stage-specific forms of a neural cell surface antigen linked to differences in glycosylation of a common polypeptide. EMBO J. 1982;1(10):1239–1244. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb00019.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rutishauser U., Thiery J. P., Brackenbury R., Edelman G. M. Adhesion among neural cells of the chick embryo. III. Relationship of the surface molecule CAM to cell adhesion and the development of histotypic patterns. J Cell Biol. 1978 Nov;79(2 Pt 1):371–381. doi: 10.1083/jcb.79.2.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Schubert D., LaCorbiere M., Klier F. G., Birdwell C. A role for adherons in neural retina cell adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1983 Apr;96(4):990–998. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.4.990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tanaka A., Kaji A. Aggregation properties of chondrocytes infected with a temperature-sensitive mutant of Rous sarcoma virus. J Cell Sci. 1980 Jun;43:407–417. doi: 10.1242/jcs.43.1.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Thiery J. P., Brackenbury R., Rutishauser U., Edelman G. M. Adhesion among neural cells of the chick embryo. II. Purification and characterization of a cell adhesion molecule from neural retina. J Biol Chem. 1977 Oct 10;252(19):6841–6845. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Thiery J. P., Duband J. L., Rutishauser U., Edelman G. M. Cell adhesion molecules in early chicken embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Nov;79(21):6737–6741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.21.6737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Thomas W. A., Steinberg M. S. Two distinct adhesion mechanisms in embryonic neural retina cells. II. An immunological analysis. Dev Biol. 1981 Jan 15;81(1):106–114. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90352-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4350–4354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Urushihara H., Ozaki H. S., Takeichi M. Immunological detection of cell surface components related with aggregation of Chinese hamster and chick embryonic cells. Dev Biol. 1979 May;70(1):206–216. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(79)90017-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Whur P., Koppel H., Urquhart C., Williams D. C. Quantitative electronic analysis of normal and transformed BHK21 fibroblast aggregation. J Cell Sci. 1977 Feb;23:193–209. doi: 10.1242/jcs.23.1.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wright T. C., Ukena T. E., Campbell R., Karnovsky M. J. Rates of aggregation, loss of anchorage dependence, and tumorigenicity of cultured cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jan;74(1):258–262. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.1.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wright T. C., Underhill C. B., Toole B. P., Karnovsky M. J. Divalent cation-independent aggregation of rat-1 fibroblasts infected with a temperature-sensitive mutant of Rous sarcoma virus. Cancer Res. 1981 Dec;41(12 Pt 1):5107–5113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES