Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1985 Apr 1;100(4):1103–1114. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.4.1103

Development of cell surface linkage complexes in cultured fibroblasts

PMCID: PMC2113771  PMID: 3884631

Abstract

The possible role of a 140K membrane-associated protein complex (140K) in fibronectin-cytoskeleton associations has been examined. The 140K was identified by the monoclonal antibody JG22E. Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies to the 140K showed identical patterns of binding to the cell membranes of fixed and permeabilized chicken embryonic fibroblasts; localization was diffuse, but with marked concentration in cell-to-extracellular matrix contact sites. Correlative localization with interference reflection microscopy and double-label or triple- label immunofluorescence showed that 140K co-distributed with extracellular fibronectin fibrils and intracellular alpha-actinin in microfilament bundles at extracellular matrix contact sites but tended not to co-localize with tropomyosin present in bundles at sites farther from adhesion sites. In addition, binding of antibodies to 140K, alpha- actinin, and fibronectin was excluded from vinculin-rich focal adhesion sites at the cellular periphery. A progressive development of cell surface alpha-actinin-140K-fibronectin associations was observed in early spreading cells. The anti-140K monoclonal antibody JG22E inhibited the attachment and spreading of both normal and Rous sarcoma virus-transformed chicken embryonic fibroblasts to a fibronectin substratum. However, the anti-140K monoclonal antibody became a positive mediator of cell attachment and spreading if it was adsorbed or cross-linked to the substratum. Our results provide the first description of a membrane-associated protein complex that co-localizes with fibronectin and microfilament bundles, and they suggest that the 140K complex may be part of a cell surface linkage between fibronectin and the cytoskeleton.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (5.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ali I. U., Mautner V., Lanza R., Hynes R. O. Restoration of normal morphology, adhesion and cytoskeleton in transformed cells by addition of a transformation-sensitive surface protein. Cell. 1977 May;11(1):115–126. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90322-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avnur Z., Geiger B. The removal of extracellular fibronectin from areas of cell-substrate contact. Cell. 1981 Jul;25(1):121–132. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90236-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burnette W. N. "Western blotting": electrophoretic transfer of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate--polyacrylamide gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radiographic detection with antibody and radioiodinated protein A. Anal Biochem. 1981 Apr;112(2):195–203. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90281-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burridge K., Feramisco J. R. Microinjection and localization of a 130K protein in living fibroblasts: a relationship to actin and fibronectin. Cell. 1980 Mar;19(3):587–595. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(80)80035-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carter W. G., Rauvala H., Hakomori S. I. Studies on cell adhesion and recognition. II. The kinetics of cell adhesion and cell spreading on surfaces coated with carbohydrate-reactive proteins (glycosidases and lectins) and fibronectin. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jan;88(1):138–148. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.1.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chapman A. E. Characterization of a 140Kd cell surface glycoprotein involved in myoblast adhesion. J Cell Biochem. 1984;25(2):109–121. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240250206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen W. T. Mechanism of retraction of the trailing edge during fibroblast movement. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jul;90(1):187–200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.1.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen W. T., Olden K., Bernard B. A., Chu F. F. Expression of transformation-associated protease(s) that degrade fibronectin at cell contact sites. J Cell Biol. 1984 Apr;98(4):1546–1555. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.4.1546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen W. T., Singer S. J. Fibronectin is not present in the focal adhesions formed between normal cultured fibroblasts and their substrata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Dec;77(12):7318–7322. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.12.7318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen W. T., Singer S. J. Immunoelectron microscopic studies of the sites of cell-substratum and cell-cell contacts in cultured fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1982 Oct;95(1):205–222. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.1.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chiquet M., Puri E. C., Turner D. C. Fibronectin mediates attachment of chicken myoblasts to a gelatin-coated substratum. J Biol Chem. 1979 Jun 25;254(12):5475–5482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. David-Pfeuty T., Singer S. J. Altered distributions of the cytoskeletal proteins vinculin and alpha-actinin in cultured fibroblasts transformed by Rous sarcoma virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6687–6691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Decker C., Greggs R., Duggan K., Stubbs J., Horwitz A. Adhesive multiplicity in the interaction of embryonic fibroblasts and myoblasts with extracellular matrices. J Cell Biol. 1984 Oct;99(4 Pt 1):1398–1404. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.4.1398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Geiger B., Dutton A. H., Tokuyasu K. T., Singer S. J. Immunoelectron microscope studies of membrane-microfilament interactions: distributions of alpha-actinin, tropomyosin, and vinculin in intestinal epithelial brush border and chicken gizzard smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1981 Dec;91(3 Pt 1):614–628. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Greve J. M., Gottlieb D. I. Monoclonal antibodies which alter the morphology of cultured chick myogenic cells. J Cell Biochem. 1982;18(2):221–229. doi: 10.1002/jcb.1982.240180209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grinnell F., Hays D. G. Cell adhesion and spreading factor. Similarity to cold insoluble globulin in human serum. Exp Cell Res. 1978 Aug;115(1):221–229. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(78)90419-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grinnell F., Hays D. G. Induction of cell spreading by substratum-adsorbed ligands directed against the cell surface. Exp Cell Res. 1978 Oct 15;116(2):275–284. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(78)90449-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heggeness M. H., Ash J. F., Singer S. J. Transmembrane linkage of fibronectin to intracellular actin-containing filaments in cultured human fibroblasts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1978 Jun 20;312:414–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1978.tb16822.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hynes R. O., Destree A. T. Relationships between fibronectin (LETS protein) and actin. Cell. 1978 Nov;15(3):875–886. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90272-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hynes R. O., Destree A. T., Wagner D. D. Relationships between microfilaments, cell-substratum adhesion, and fibronectin. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1982;46(Pt 2):659–670. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1982.046.01.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hynes R. O., Wyke J. A. Alterations in surface proteins in chicken cells transformed by temperature-sensitive mutants of Rous sarcoma virus. Virology. 1975 Apr;64(2):492–504. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(75)90126-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hynes R. O., Yamada K. M. Fibronectins: multifunctional modular glycoproteins. J Cell Biol. 1982 Nov;95(2 Pt 1):369–377. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.2.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Izzard C. S., Lochner L. R. Cell-to-substrate contacts in living fibroblasts: an interference reflexion study with an evaluation of the technique. J Cell Sci. 1976 Jun;21(1):129–159. doi: 10.1242/jcs.21.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Izzard C. S., Lochner L. R. Formation of cell-to-substrate contacts during fibroblast motility: an interference-reflexion study. J Cell Sci. 1980 Apr;42:81–116. doi: 10.1242/jcs.42.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Neff N. T., Lowrey C., Decker C., Tovar A., Damsky C., Buck C., Horwitz A. F. A monoclonal antibody detaches embryonic skeletal muscle from extracellular matrices. J Cell Biol. 1982 Nov;95(2 Pt 1):654–666. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.2.654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Oesch B., Birchmeier W. New surface component of fibroblast's focal contacts identified by a monoclonal antibody. Cell. 1982 Dec;31(3 Pt 2):671–679. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90322-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Olden K., Yamada K. M. Mechanism of the decrease in the major cell surface protein of chick embryo fibroblasts after transformation. Cell. 1977 Aug;11(4):957–969. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90307-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pena S. D., Hughes R. C. Fibronectin-plasma membrane interactions in the adhesion and spreading of hamster fibroblasts. Nature. 1978 Nov 2;276(5683):80–83. doi: 10.1038/276080a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rauvala H., Carter W. G., Hakomori S. I. Studies on cell adhesion and recognition. I. Extent and specificity of cell adhesion triggered by carbohydrate-reactive proteins (glycosidases and lectins) and by fibronectin. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jan;88(1):127–137. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.1.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ruoslahti E., Engvall E., Hayman E. G. Fibronectin: current concepts of its structure and functions. Coll Relat Res. 1981;1(1):95–128. doi: 10.1016/s0174-173x(80)80011-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ruoslahti E., Hayman E. G., Kuusela P., Shively J. E., Engvall E. Isolation of a tryptic fragment containing the collagen-binding site of plasma fibronectin. J Biol Chem. 1979 Jul 10;254(13):6054–6059. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Singer I. I. Association of fibronectin and vinculin with focal contacts and stress fibers in stationary hamster fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1982 Feb;92(2):398–408. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.2.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Singer I. I., Paradiso P. R. A transmembrane relationship between fibronectin and vinculin (130 kd protein): serum modulation in normal and transformed hamster fibroblasts. Cell. 1981 May;24(2):481–492. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90339-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Singer I. I. The fibronexus: a transmembrane association of fibronectin-containing fibers and bundles of 5 nm microfilaments in hamster and human fibroblasts. Cell. 1979 Mar;16(3):675–685. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90040-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sugrue S. P., Hay E. D. Interaction of embryonic corneal epithelium with exogenous collagen, laminin, and fibronectin: role of endogenous protein synthesis. Dev Biol. 1982 Jul;92(1):97–106. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90154-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vollmers H. P., Birchmeier W. Monoclonal antibodies inhibit the adhesion of mouse B 16 melanoma cells in vitro and block lung metastasis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jun;80(12):3729–3733. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.12.3729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Willingham M. C., Yamada K. M., Yamada S. S., Pouysségur J., Pastan I. Microfilament bundles and cell shape are related to adhesiveness to substratum and are dissociable from growth control in cultured fibroblasts. Cell. 1977 Mar;10(3):375–380. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yamada K. M. Cell surface interactions with extracellular materials. Annu Rev Biochem. 1983;52:761–799. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.003553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yamada K. M. Immunological characterization of a major transformation-sensitive fibroblast cell surface glycoprotein. Localization, redistribution, and role in cell shape. J Cell Biol. 1978 Aug;78(2):520–541. doi: 10.1083/jcb.78.2.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yamada K. M., Kennedy D. W. Dualistic nature of adhesive protein function: fibronectin and its biologically active peptide fragments can autoinhibit fibronectin function. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 1):29–36. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES