Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1985 Oct 1;101(4):1492–1500. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.4.1492

Packing volume of sedimented microtubules: regulation and potential relationship to an intracellular matrix

PMCID: PMC2113933  PMID: 2864347

Abstract

To determine the contribution of microtubules to a hypothetical intracellular matrix, we have analyzed the space occupied by microtubules in vitro. Taxol-stabilized microtubules assembled from purified (three-times-cycled) bovine brain microtubule protein were pelleted by centrifugation under standardized conditions. The specific volume of the pellet, defined as the microliter volume per milligram protein, was 22.4. As suggested by others, this volume was strongly dependent on microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs), as shown by quantitation of the effects of purified MAP supplementation on specific volume. The specific volumes of microtubule pellets stripped of MAPs by high salt or chymotryptic digestion approached the mathematically optimal (least occupied space) and increased 14-fold with the highest MAP concentrations employed. Packing was also dependent on pH. Specific volumes comparable to those of MAP-depleted microtubules were attainable at pH's from 5.5 to 6.0, and specific volumes more than doubled at pH 7.5. MAP content was unaffected by pH. We present a theoretical analysis that suggests that as microtubules are centrifuged the mixture behaves as a liquid crystal. With packing, the mixture undergoes an isotropic-nematic phase transition in which the microtubules become oriented principally as parallel rods, mimicking their orientation in vivo. From the known concentration of microtubules in vivo, it can be inferred from our measurements that in some cells a large fraction, perhaps 40-50% of the cytosolic volume, is occupied by microtubules that form a mechanically irreducible space. Further theoretical analysis employing Ogston's formulation of the penetrability of fibrous networks suggests that the space between microtubules (in contrast to the extracellular matrix) imposes little barrier to the diffusion of macromolecules. A microtubule array thus achieves mechanical stability without affecting transport by diffusion. The space can accommodate other fibrous networks that could then affect transport, and, as we show, the space itself may be regulated by MAP content and intracellular pH.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. April E. W., Brandt P. W., Elliott G. F. The myofilament lattice: studies on isolated fibers. II. The effects of osmotic strength, ionic concentration, and pH upon the unit-cell volume. J Cell Biol. 1972 Apr;53(1):53–65. doi: 10.1083/jcb.53.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asnes C. F., Wilson L. Isolation of bovine brain microtubule protein without glycerol: polymerization kinetics change during purification cycles. Anal Biochem. 1979 Sep 15;98(1):64–73. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90706-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berlin R. D., Oliver J. M. Analogous ultrastructure and surface properties during capping and phagocytosis in leukocytes. J Cell Biol. 1978 Jun;77(3):789–804. doi: 10.1083/jcb.77.3.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bray D., Bunge M. B. Serial analysis of microtubules in cultured rat sensory axons. J Neurocytol. 1981 Aug;10(4):589–605. doi: 10.1007/BF01262592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Comper W. D., Laurent T. C. Physiological function of connective tissue polysaccharides. Physiol Rev. 1978 Jan;58(1):255–315. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1978.58.1.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fellous A., Francon J., Lennon A. M., Nunez J. Microtubule assembly in vitro. Purification of assembly-promoting factors. Eur J Biochem. 1977 Aug 15;78(1):167–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11726.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jacobson K., Wojcieszyn J. The translational mobility of substances within the cytoplasmic matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Nov;81(21):6747–6751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.21.6747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim H., Binder L. I., Rosenbaum J. L. The periodic association of MAP2 with brain microtubules in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1979 Feb;80(2):266–276. doi: 10.1083/jcb.80.2.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MacLean-Fletcher S. D., Pollard T. D. Viscometric analysis of the gelation of Acanthamoeba extracts and purification of two gelation factors. J Cell Biol. 1980 May;85(2):414–428. doi: 10.1083/jcb.85.2.414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mastro A. M., Babich M. A., Taylor W. D., Keith A. D. Diffusion of a small molecule in the cytoplasm of mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jun;81(11):3414–3418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.11.3414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Melmed R. N., Karanian P. J., Berlin R. D. Control of cell volume in the J774 macrophage by microtubule disassembly and cyclic AMP. J Cell Biol. 1981 Sep;90(3):761–768. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.3.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meyer F. A. Macromolecular basis of globular protein exclusion and of swelling pressure in loose connective tissue (umbilical cord). Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983 Feb 22;755(3):388–399. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(83)90242-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Murphy D. B., Borisy G. G. Association of high-molecular-weight proteins with microtubules and their role in microtubule assembly in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jul;72(7):2696–2700. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.7.2696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Regula C. S., Pfeiffer J. R., Berlin R. D. Microtubule assembly and disassembly at alkaline pH. J Cell Biol. 1981 Apr;89(1):45–53. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Salmon E. D. Pressure-induced depolymerization of brain microtubules in vitro. Science. 1975 Sep 12;189(4206):884–886. doi: 10.1126/science.1171523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schiff P. B., Fant J., Horwitz S. B. Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by taxol. Nature. 1979 Feb 22;277(5698):665–667. doi: 10.1038/277665a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vallee R. Structure and phosphorylation of microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP 2). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jun;77(6):3206–3210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wolosewick J. J., Porter K. R. Microtrabecular lattice of the cytoplasmic ground substance. Artifact or reality. J Cell Biol. 1979 Jul;82(1):114–139. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.1.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES