Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1986 Jan 1;102(1):124–130. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.1.124

Expression of muscle genes in heterokaryons depends on gene dosage

PMCID: PMC2114035  PMID: 3941151

Abstract

We report that gene dosage, or the ratio of nuclei from two cell types fused to form a heterokaryon, affects the time course of differentiation-specific gene expression. The rate of appearance of the human muscle antigen, 5.1H11, is significantly faster in heterokaryons with equal or near-equal numbers of mouse muscle and human fibroblast nuclei than in heterokaryons with increased numbers of nuclei from either cell type. By 4 d after fusion, a high frequency of gene expression is evident at all ratios and greater than 75% of heterokaryons express the antigen even when the nonmuscle nuclei greatly outnumber the muscle nuclei. The kinetic differences observed with different nuclear ratios suggest that the concentration of putative trans-acting factors significantly influences the rate of muscle gene expression: a threshold concentration is necessary, but an excess may be inhibitory.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (862.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blau H. M., Chiu C. P., Pavlath G. K., Webster C. Muscle gene expression in heterokaryons. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1985;182:231–247. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-4907-5_20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blau H. M., Chiu C. P., Webster C. Cytoplasmic activation of human nuclear genes in stable heterocaryons. Cell. 1983 Apr;32(4):1171–1180. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90300-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borrelli E., Hen R., Chambon P. Adenovirus-2 E1A products repress enhancer-induced stimulation of transcription. Nature. 1984 Dec 13;312(5995):608–612. doi: 10.1038/312608a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown D. D. The role of stable complexes that repress and activate eucaryotic genes. Cell. 1984 Jun;37(2):359–365. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90366-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caplan A. I., Ordahl C. P. Irreversible gene repression model for control of development. Science. 1978 Jul 14;201(4351):120–130. doi: 10.1126/science.351805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chiu C. P., Blau H. M. 5-Azacytidine permits gene activation in a previously noninducible cell type. Cell. 1985 Feb;40(2):417–424. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90155-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chiu C. P., Blau H. M. Reprogramming cell differentiation in the absence of DNA synthesis. Cell. 1984 Jul;37(3):879–887. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90423-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cozzarelli N. R. The mechanism of action of inhibitors of DNA synthesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:641–668. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.003233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Robertis E. M., Gurdon J. B. Gene activation in somatic nuclei after injection into amphibian oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jun;74(6):2470–2474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.6.2470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GURDON J. B. The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from intestinal epithelium cells of feeding tadpoles. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1962 Dec;10:622–640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jacobs J. P., Jones C. M., Baille J. P. Characteristics of a human diploid cell designated MRC-5. Nature. 1970 Jul 11;227(5254):168–170. doi: 10.1038/227168a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lawrence J. B., Coleman J. R. Extinction of muscle-specific properties in somatic cell heterokaryons. Dev Biol. 1984 Feb;101(2):463–476. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90160-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Metzenberg R. L., Chia W. Genetic control of phosphorus assimilation in Neurospora crassa: dose-dependent dominance and recessiveness in constitutive mutants. Genetics. 1979 Nov;93(3):625–643. doi: 10.1093/genetics/93.3.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meyer B. J., Maurer R., Ptashne M. Gene regulation at the right operator (OR) of bacteriophage lambda. II. OR1, OR2, and OR3: their roles in mediating the effects of repressor and cro. J Mol Biol. 1980 May 15;139(2):163–194. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Myers R. M., Rio D. C., Robbins A. K., Tjian R. SV40 gene expression is modulated by the cooperative binding of T antigen to DNA. Cell. 1981 Aug;25(2):373–384. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nadal-Ginard B. Commitment, fusion and biochemical differentiation of a myogenic cell line in the absence of DNA synthesis. Cell. 1978 Nov;15(3):855–864. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90270-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ptashne M., Jeffrey A., Johnson A. D., Maurer R., Meyer B. J., Pabo C. O., Roberts T. M., Sauer R. T. How the lambda repressor and cro work. Cell. 1980 Jan;19(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90383-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schmid V., Alder H. Isolated, mononucleated, striated muscle can undergo pluripotent transdifferentiation and form a complex regenerate. Cell. 1984 Oct;38(3):801–809. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90275-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thompson L. H., Baker R. M. Isolation of mutants of cultured mammalian cells. Methods Cell Biol. 1973;6:209–281. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60052-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tjian R. Protein-DNA interactions at the origin of simian virus 40 DNA replication. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 2):655–661. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1979.043.01.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tjian R. The binding site on SV40 DNA for a T antigen-related protein. Cell. 1978 Jan;13(1):165–179. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90147-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Walsh F. S., Ritter M. A. Surface antigen differentiation during human myogenesis in culture. Nature. 1981 Jan 1;289(5793):60–64. doi: 10.1038/289060a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weiss M. C. The analysis of cell differentiation by hybridization of somatic cells. Results Probl Cell Differ. 1980;11:87–92. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-38267-6_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wormington W. M., Brown D. D. Onset of 5 S RNA gene regulation during Xenopus embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 1983 Sep;99(1):248–257. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90273-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wormington W. M., Schlissel M., Brown D. D. Developmental regulation of Xenopus 5S RNA genes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 2):879–884. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wright W. E. Expression of differentiated functions in heterokaryons between skeletal myocytes, adrenal cells, fibroblasts and glial cells. Exp Cell Res. 1984 Mar;151(1):55–69. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(84)90355-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wright W. E. Induction of muscle genes in neural cells. J Cell Biol. 1984 Feb;98(2):427–435. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.2.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yaffe D., Saxel O. Serial passaging and differentiation of myogenic cells isolated from dystrophic mouse muscle. Nature. 1977 Dec 22;270(5639):725–727. doi: 10.1038/270725a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES