Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1986 Jan 1;102(1):200–209. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.1.200

The molecular organization of myosin in stress fibers of cultured cells

PMCID: PMC2114045  PMID: 3510218

Abstract

Antibodies to chicken gizzard myosin, subfragment 1, light chain 20, and light meromyosin were used to visualize myosin in stress fibers of cultured chicken cells. The antibody specificity was tested on purified gizzard proteins and total cell lysates using immunogold silver staining on protein blots. Immunofluorescence on cultured chicken fibroblasts and epithelial cells exhibited a similar staining pattern of antibodies to total myosin, subfragment 1, and light chain 20, whereas the antibodies to light meromyosin showed a substantially different reaction. The electron microscopic distribution of these antibodies was investigated using the indirect and direct immunogold staining method on permeabilized and fixed cells. The indirect approach enabled us to describe the general distribution of myosin in stress fibers. Direct double immunogold labeling, however, provided more detailed information on the orientation of myosin molecules and their localization relative to alpha-actinin: alpha-actinin, identified with antibodies coupled to 10-nm gold, was concentrated in the dense bodies or electron-dense bands of stress fibers, whereas myosin was confined to the intervening electron-lucid regions. Depending on the antibodies used in combination with alpha-actinin, the intervening regions revealed a different staining pattern: antibodies to myosin (reactive with the head portion of nonmuscle myosin) and to light chain 20 (both coupled to 5-nm gold) labeled two opposite bands adjacent to alpha- actinin, and antibodies to light meromyosin (coupled to 5-nm gold) labeled a single central zone. Based on these results, we conclude that myosin in stress fibers is organized into bipolar filaments.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aoki M., Tavassoli M. Identification of microfilaments in marrow sinus endothelial cells: their possible role in cell egress. J Ultrastruct Res. 1981 Mar;74(3):255–258. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(81)80116-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Begg D. A., Rodewald R., Rebhun L. I. The visualization of actin filament polarity in thin sections. Evidence for the uniform polarity of membrane-associated filaments. J Cell Biol. 1978 Dec;79(3):846–852. doi: 10.1083/jcb.79.3.846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buckley I. K., Porter K. R. Cytoplasmic fibrils in living cultured cells. A light and electron microscope study. Protoplasma. 1967;64(4):349–380. doi: 10.1007/BF01666538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burridge K. Are stress fibres contractile? Nature. 1981 Dec 24;294(5843):691–692. doi: 10.1038/294691a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Byers H. R., Fujiwara K. Stress fibers in cells in situ: immunofluorescence visualization with antiactin, antimyosin, and anti-alpha-actinin. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;93(3):804–811. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.3.804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Byers H. R., White G. E., Fujiwara K. Organization and function of stress fibers in cells in vitro and in situ. A review. Cell Muscle Motil. 1984;5:83–137. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-4592-3_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang C. M., Goldman R. D. The localization of actin-like fibers in cultured neuroblastoma cells as revealed by heavy meromyosin binding. J Cell Biol. 1973 Jun;57(3):867–874. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.3.867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cross R. A., Bardsley R. G., Ledward D. A., Small J. V., Sobieszek A. Conformational stability of the myosin rod. Eur J Biochem. 1984 Dec 3;145(2):305–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1984.tb08553.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Bruyn P. P., Cho Y. Contractile structures in endothelial cells of splenic sinusoids. J Ultrastruct Res. 1974 Oct;49(1):24–33. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(74)90075-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Mey J., Moeremans M., Geuens G., Nuydens R., De Brabander M. High resolution light and electron microscopic localization of tubulin with the IGS (immuno gold staining) method. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1981 Sep;5(9):889–899. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(81)90204-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Feramisco J. R. Microinjection of fluorescently labeled alpha-actinin into living fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Aug;76(8):3967–3971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.8.3967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fujiwara K., Pollard T. D. Fluorescent antibody localization of myosin in the cytoplasm, cleavage furrow, and mitotic spindle of human cells. J Cell Biol. 1976 Dec;71(3):848–875. doi: 10.1083/jcb.71.3.848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gabbiani G., Gabbiani F., Lombardi D., Schwartz S. M. Organization of actin cytoskeleton in normal and regenerating arterial endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Apr;80(8):2361–2364. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.8.2361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Geiger B. A 130K protein from chicken gizzard: its localization at the termini of microfilament bundles in cultured chicken cells. Cell. 1979 Sep;18(1):193–205. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90368-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gershoni J. M., Palade G. E. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels to a positively charged membrane filter. Anal Biochem. 1982 Aug;124(2):396–405. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(82)90056-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Goldman R. D., Chojnacki B., Yerna M. J. Ultrastructure of microfilament bundles in baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) cells. The use of tannic acid. J Cell Biol. 1979 Mar;80(3):759–766. doi: 10.1083/jcb.80.3.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gordon S. R., Essner E., Rothstein H. In situ demonstration of actin in normal and injured ocular tissues using 7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole phallacidin. Cell Motil. 1982;2(4):343–354. doi: 10.1002/cm.970020404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gordon W. E., 3rd Immunofluorescent and ultrastructural studies of "sarcomeric" units in stress fibers of cultured non-muscle cells. Exp Cell Res. 1978 Dec;117(2):253–260. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(78)90138-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Herman I. M., Pollard T. D. Electron microscopic localization of cytoplasmic myosin with ferritin-labeled antibodies. J Cell Biol. 1981 Feb;88(2):346–351. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.2.346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ishikawa H., Bischoff R., Holtzer H. Formation of arrowhead complexes with heavy meromyosin in a variety of cell types. J Cell Biol. 1969 Nov;43(2):312–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Karlsson R., Lindberg U. Changes in the organization of actin and myosin in non-muscle cells induced by N-ethylmaleimide. Exp Cell Res. 1985 Mar;157(1):95–115. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(85)90155-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Langanger G., de Mey J., Moeremans M., Daneels G., de Brabander M., Small J. V. Ultrastructural localization of alpha-actinin and filamin in cultured cells with the immunogold staining (IGS) method. J Cell Biol. 1984 Oct;99(4 Pt 1):1324–1334. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.4.1324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lazarides E., Burridge K. Alpha-actinin: immunofluorescent localization of a muscle structural protein in nonmuscle cells. Cell. 1975 Nov;6(3):289–298. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(75)90180-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lazarides E. Tropomyosin antibody: the specific localization of tropomyosin in nonmuscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1975 Jun;65(3):549–561. doi: 10.1083/jcb.65.3.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Majno G., Shea S. M., Leventhal M. Endothelial contraction induced by histamine-type mediators: an electron microscopic study. J Cell Biol. 1969 Sep;42(3):647–672. doi: 10.1083/jcb.42.3.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Moeremans M., Daneels G., Van Dijck A., Langanger G., De Mey J. Sensitive visualization of antigen-antibody reactions in dot and blot immune overlay assays with immunogold and immunogold/silver staining. J Immunol Methods. 1984 Nov 30;74(2):353–360. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(84)90303-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Owada M. K., Hakura A., Iida K., Yahara I., Sobue K., Kakiuchi S. Occurrence of caldesmon (a calmodulin-binding protein) in cultured cells: comparison of normal and transformed cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 May;81(10):3133–3137. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.10.3133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Röhlich P., Oláh I. Cross-striated fibrils in the endothelium of the rat myometral arterioles. J Ultrastruct Res. 1967 Jun;18(5):667–676. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(67)80212-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sanger J. W., Sanger J. M., Jockusch B. M. Differences in the stress fibers between fibroblasts and epithelial cells. J Cell Biol. 1983 Apr;96(4):961–969. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.4.961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sobieszek A., Small J. V. Myosin-linked calcium regulation in vertebrate smooth muscle. J Mol Biol. 1976 Mar 25;102(1):75–92. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90074-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Spooner B. S., Ash J. F., Wrenn J. T., Frater R. B., Wessells N. K. Heavy meromyosin binding to microfilaments involved in cell and morphogenetic movements. Tissue Cell. 1973;5(1):37–46. doi: 10.1016/s0040-8166(73)80004-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Spooner B. S., Yamada K. M., Wessells N. K. Microfilaments and cell locomotion. J Cell Biol. 1971 Jun;49(3):595–613. doi: 10.1083/jcb.49.3.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang K., Ash J. F., Singer S. J. Filamin, a new high-molecular-weight protein found in smooth muscle and non-muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Nov;72(11):4483–4486. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Weber K., Groeschel-Stewart U. Antibody to myosin: the specific visualization of myosin-containing filaments in nonmuscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Nov;71(11):4561–4564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.11.4561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wehland J., Weber K. Distribution of fluorescently labeled actin and tropomyosin after microinjection in living tissue culture cells as observed with TV image intensification. Exp Cell Res. 1980 Jun;127(2):397–408. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(80)90444-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. White G. E., Gimbrone M. A., Jr, Fujiwara K. Factors influencing the expression of stress fibers in vascular endothelial cells in situ. J Cell Biol. 1983 Aug;97(2):416–424. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.2.416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wong A. J., Pollard T. D., Herman I. M. Actin filament stress fibers in vascular endothelial cells in vivo. Science. 1983 Feb 18;219(4586):867–869. doi: 10.1126/science.6681677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zigmond S. H., Otto J. J., Bryan J. Organization of myosin in a submembranous sheath in well-spread human fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1979 Mar 15;119(2):205–219. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(79)90349-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. de Lanerolle P., Adelstein R. S., Feramisco J. R., Burridge K. Characterization of antibodies to smooth muscle myosin kinase and their use in localizing myosin kinase in nonmuscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Aug;78(8):4738–4742. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.8.4738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES