Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1986 Mar 1;102(3):902–910. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.902

Mutants of the membrane-binding region of Semliki Forest virus E2 protein. II. Topology and membrane binding

PMCID: PMC2114133  PMID: 3949882

Abstract

The p62/E2 protein of Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is a typical transmembrane glycoprotein, with an amino-terminal lumenal domain, a transmembrane (hydrophobic) domain, and a carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic domain (or tail). Our hypothesis has been that the membrane-binding polypeptide region (membrane anchor) of this protein consists of both the transmembrane domain and the adjacent positively charged peptide, Arg-Ser-Lys, which is part of the cytoplasmic domain. We have investigated three anchor mutants of the p62 protein with respect to both their disposition and their stability in cell membranes. The construction of the three mutants has been described (Cutler, D.F., and H. Garoff, J. Cell Biol., 102:889-901). They are as follows: A1, changing the basic charge cluster from Arg-Ser-Lys(+2) to Gly-Ser-Glu(- 1); A2, replacing an Ala in the middle of the hydrophobic stretch with a Glu; A3, changing the charge cluster from Arg-Ser-Lys(+2) to Gly-Ser- Met(0). All three mutants retain the transmembrane configuration of the wild-type p62. In a cell homogenate they have a cytoplasmic domain that is accessible to protease. In living cells an anti-peptide antibody specific for the cytoplasmic tail of p62 reacts with the tails of both wild-type and mutant p62s following its introduction into the cytoplasm. All three mutant proteins have Triton X-114 binding properties similar to the wild-type p62. However, when the membranes of cells expressing the three mutants or the wild-type p62 protein are washed with sodium carbonate, pH 11.5, three to four times as much mutant protein as wild-type p62 is released from the membranes. Thus the stability in cell membranes of the three mutant p62 proteins is significantly reduced.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams G. A., Rose J. K. Incorporation of a charged amino acid into the membrane-spanning domain blocks cell surface transport but not membrane anchoring of a viral glycoprotein. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Jun;5(6):1442–1448. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.6.1442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams G. A., Rose J. K. Structural requirements of a membrane-spanning domain for protein anchoring and cell surface transport. Cell. 1985 Jul;41(3):1007–1015. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80081-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alcaraz G., Kinet J. P., Kumar N., Wank S. A., Metzger H. Phase separation of the receptor for immunoglobulin E and its subunits in Triton X-114. J Biol Chem. 1984 Dec 10;259(23):14922–14927. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bordier C. Phase separation of integral membrane proteins in Triton X-114 solution. J Biol Chem. 1981 Feb 25;256(4):1604–1607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis N. G., Boeke J. D., Model P. Fine structure of a membrane anchor domain. J Mol Biol. 1985 Jan 5;181(1):111–121. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90329-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis N. G., Model P. An artificial anchor domain: hydrophobicity suffices to stop transfer. Cell. 1985 Jun;41(2):607–614. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fujiki Y., Hubbard A. L., Fowler S., Lazarow P. B. Isolation of intracellular membranes by means of sodium carbonate treatment: application to endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol. 1982 Apr;93(1):97–102. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garoff H., Frischauf A. M., Simons K., Lehrach H., Delius H. Nucleotide sequence of cdna coding for Semliki Forest virus membrane glycoproteins. Nature. 1980 Nov 20;288(5788):236–241. doi: 10.1038/288236a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Garoff H., Kondor-Koch C., Pettersson R., Burke B. Expression of Semliki Forest virus proteins from cloned complementary DNA. II. The membrane-spanning glycoprotein E2 is transported to the cell surface without its normal cytoplasmic domain. J Cell Biol. 1983 Sep;97(3):652–658. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.3.652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Henderson R. The structure of the purple membrane from Halobacterium hallobium: analysis of the X-ray diffraction pattern. J Mol Biol. 1975 Apr 5;93(2):123–138. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90123-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pinter A., Honnen W. J. The mature form of the Friend spleen focus-forming virus envelope protein, gp65, is efficiently secreted from cells. Virology. 1985 Jun;143(2):646–650. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(85)90406-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Quinn P., Griffiths G., Warren G. Density of newly synthesized plasma membrane proteins in intracellular membranes II. Biochemical studies. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;98(6):2142–2147. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.6.2142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rettenmier C. W., Roussel M. F., Quinn C. O., Kitchingman G. R., Look A. T., Sherr C. J. Transmembrane orientation of glycoproteins encoded by the v-fms oncogene. Cell. 1985 Apr;40(4):971–981. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90357-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Simons K., Warren G. Semliki Forest virus: a probe for membrane traffic in the animal cell. Adv Protein Chem. 1984;36:79–132. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60296-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Steck T. L., Yu J. Selective solubilization of proteins from red blood cell membranes by protein perturbants. J Supramol Struct. 1973;1(3):220–232. doi: 10.1002/jss.400010307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tabe L., Krieg P., Strachan R., Jackson D., Wallis E., Colman A. Segregation of mutant ovalbumins and ovalbumin-globin fusion proteins in Xenopus oocytes. Identification of an ovalbumin signal sequence. J Mol Biol. 1984 Dec 15;180(3):645–666. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90031-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tan K. B., Sokol F. Virion-bound protein kinase in Semliki forest and Sindbis viruses. J Virol. 1974 Jun;13(6):1245–1253. doi: 10.1128/jvi.13.6.1245-1253.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Timm B., Kondor-Koch C., Lehrach H., Riedel H., Edström J. E., Garoff H. Expression of viral membrane proteins from cloned cDNA by microinjection into eukaryotic cell nuclei. Methods Enzymol. 1983;96:496–511. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(83)96043-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. von Heijne G. Trans-membrane translocation of proteins. A detailed physico-chemical analysis. Eur J Biochem. 1980 Feb;103(3):431–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb05966.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES