Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1986 Apr 1;102(4):1183–1190. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.4.1183

Molecular mobility and nucleocytoplasmic flux in hepatoma cells

PMCID: PMC2114189  PMID: 2420804

Abstract

Fluorescence microphotolysis (photobleaching) was used to measure, in single polyethylene glycol-induced polykaryons of hepatoma tissue culture cells, nucleocytoplasmic flux and intracellular mobility for a series of dextrans ranging in molecular mass from 3 to 150 kD and for bovine serum albumin. For the dextrans, the cytoplasmic and the nucleoplasmic translational diffusion coefficients amounted to approximately 9 and approximately 15%, respectively, of the value in dilute buffer. The diffusion coefficients depended inversely on molecular radius, suggesting that diffusion was dominated by viscosity effects. By application of the Stokes-Einstein equation, cytoplasmic and nucleoplasmic viscosities were derived to be 6.6 and 8.1 cP, respectively, at 23 degrees C. Between 10 and 37 degrees C nucleoplasmic diffusion coefficients increased by approximately 45-85%, whereas cytoplasmic diffusion coefficients were virtually independent of temperature. In contrast to that of the dextrans, diffusion of bovine serum albumin was more restricted. In the cytoplasm the diffusion coefficient was approximately 1.5% of the value in dilute buffer; in the nucleus albumin was largely immobile. This indicated that albumin mobility is dominated by association with immobile cellular structures. Nucleocytoplasmic flux of dextrans depended inversely on molecular mass with an exclusion limit between 17 and 41 kD. This agrees with previous measurements on primary hepatocytes (Peters, R., 1984, EMBO [Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.] J. 3:1831-1836), suggesting that in both cell types the nuclear envelope has properties of a molecular sieve with a functional pore radius of approximately 55 A.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (954.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Axelrod D., Koppel D. E., Schlessinger J., Elson E., Webb W. W. Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys J. 1976 Sep;16(9):1055–1069. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85755-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Axelrod D. Lateral motion of membrane proteins and biological function. J Membr Biol. 1983;75(1):1–10. doi: 10.1007/BF01870794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barisas B. G., Leuther M. D. Fluorescence photobleaching recovery measurement of protein absolute diffusion constants. Biophys Chem. 1979 Sep;10(2):221–229. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(79)85044-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cherry R. J. Rotational and lateral diffusion of membrane proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Dec 20;559(4):289–327. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(79)90009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Darnell J. E., Jr Variety in the level of gene control in eukaryotic cells. Nature. 1982 Jun 3;297(5865):365–371. doi: 10.1038/297365a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dingwall C., Sharnick S. V., Laskey R. A. A polypeptide domain that specifies migration of nucleoplasmin into the nucleus. Cell. 1982 Sep;30(2):449–458. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90242-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Horowitz S. B., Moore L. C. The nuclear permeability, intracellular distribution, and diffusion of inulin in the amphibian oocyte. J Cell Biol. 1974 Feb;60(2):405–415. doi: 10.1083/jcb.60.2.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jacobson K., Wojcieszyn J. The translational mobility of substances within the cytoplasmic matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Nov;81(21):6747–6751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.21.6747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kalderon D., Richardson W. D., Markham A. F., Smith A. E. Sequence requirements for nuclear location of simian virus 40 large-T antigen. Nature. 1984 Sep 6;311(5981):33–38. doi: 10.1038/311033a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kreis T. E., Geiger B., Schlessinger J. Mobility of microinjected rhodamine actin within living chicken gizzard cells determined by fluorescence photobleaching recovery. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):835–845. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90445-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lanford R. E., Butel J. S. Construction and characterization of an SV40 mutant defective in nuclear transport of T antigen. Cell. 1984 Jul;37(3):801–813. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90415-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lang I., Peters R. Nuclear envelope permeability: a sensitive indicator of pore complex integrity. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1984;164:377–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Paine P. L., Moore L. C., Horowitz S. B. Nuclear envelope permeability. Nature. 1975 Mar 13;254(5496):109–114. doi: 10.1038/254109a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Paine P. L. Nucleocytoplasmic movement of fluorescent tracers microinjected into living salivary gland cells. J Cell Biol. 1975 Sep;66(3):652–657. doi: 10.1083/jcb.66.3.652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Peters R. Flux measurement in single cells by fluorescence microphotolysis. Eur Biophys J. 1984;11(1):43–50. doi: 10.1007/BF00253857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Peters R. Nuclear envelope permeability measured by fluorescence microphotolysis of single liver cell nuclei. J Biol Chem. 1983 Oct 10;258(19):11427–11429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Peters R. Nucleo-cytoplasmic flux and intracellular mobility in single hepatocytes measured by fluorescence microphotolysis. EMBO J. 1984 Aug;3(8):1831–1836. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02055.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peters R., Passow H. Anion transport in single erythrocyte ghosts measured by fluorescence microphotolysis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Nov 7;777(2):334–338. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(84)90436-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Peters R., Peters J., Tews K. H., Bähr W. A microfluorimetric study of translational diffusion in erythrocyte membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1974 Nov 15;367(3):282–294. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(74)90085-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Peters R., Richter H. P. Translational diffusion in the plasma membrane of sea urchin eggs. Dev Biol. 1981 Sep;86(2):285–293. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90186-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Peters R. Translational diffusion in the plasma membrane of single cells as studied by fluorescence microphotolysis. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1981 Aug;5(8):733–760. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(81)90231-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Reynolds C. R., Tedeschi H. Permeability properties of mammalian cell nuclei in living cells and in vitro. J Cell Sci. 1984 Aug;70:197–207. doi: 10.1242/jcs.70.1.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tanner J. E. Intracellular diffusion of water. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1983 Jul 15;224(2):416–428. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(83)90228-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang Y. L., Lanni F., McNeil P. L., Ware B. R., Taylor D. L. Mobility of cytoplasmic and membrane-associated actin in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(15):4660–4664. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.15.4660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wojcieszyn J. W., Schlegel R. A., Wu E. S., Jacobson K. A. Diffusion of injected macromolecules within the cytoplasm of living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jul;78(7):4407–4410. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.7.4407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES