Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1986 May 1;102(5):1688–1698. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.5.1688

The distribution of cytoplasmic microtubules throughout the cell cycle of the centric diatom Stephanopyxis turris: their role in nuclear migration and positioning the mitotic spindle during cytokinesis

PMCID: PMC2114199  PMID: 3517004

Abstract

The cell cycle of the marine centric diatom Stephanopyxis turris consists of a series of spatially and temporally well-ordered events. We have used immunofluorescence microscopy to examine the role of cytoplasmic microtubules in these events. At interphase, microtubules radiate out from the microtubule-organizing center, forming a network around the nucleus and extending much of the length and breadth of the cell. As the cell enters mitosis, this network breaks down and a highly ordered mitotic spindle is formed. Peripheral microtubule bundles radiate out from each spindle pole and swing out and away from the central spindle during anaphase. Treatment of synchronized cells with 2.5 X 10(-8) M Nocodazole reversibly inhibited nuclear migration concurrent with the disappearance of the extensive cytoplasmic microtubule arrays associated with migrating nuclei. Microtubule arrays and mitotic spindles that reformed after the drug was washed out appeared normal. In contrast, cells treated with 5.0 X 10(-8) M Nocodazole were not able to complete nuclear migration after the drug was washed out and the mitotic spindles that formed were multipolar. Normal and multipolar spindles that were displaced toward one end of the cell by the drug treatment had no effect on the plane of division during cytokinesis. The cleavage furrow always bisected the cell regardless of the position of the mitotic spindle, resulting in binucleate/anucleate daughter cells. This suggests that in S. turris, unlike animal cells, the location of the plane of division is cortically determined before mitosis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Asai D. J., Brokaw C. J., Thompson W. C., Wilson L. Two different monoclonal antibodies to alpha-tubulin inhibit the bending of reactivated sea urchin spermatozoa. Cell Motil. 1982;2(6):599–614. doi: 10.1002/cm.970020608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bestor T. H., Schatten G. Anti-tubulin immunofluorescence microscopy of microtubules present during the pronuclear movement of sea urchin fertilization. Dev Biol. 1981 Nov;88(1):80–91. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90220-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Busby C. H., Gunning B. Observations on pre-prophase bands of microtubules in uniseriate hairs, stomatal complexes of sugar cane, and Cyperus root meristems. Eur J Cell Biol. 1980 Jun;21(2):214–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clayton L., Lloyd C. W. Actin organization during the cell cycle in meristematic plant cells. Actin is present in the cytokinetic phragmoplast. Exp Cell Res. 1985 Jan;156(1):231–238. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(85)90277-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coss R. A., Pickett-Heaps J. D. The effects of isopropyl N-phenyl carbamate on the green alga Oedogonium cardiacum. I. Cell division. J Cell Biol. 1974 Oct;63(1):84–98. doi: 10.1083/jcb.63.1.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dawson P. J., Hulme J. S., Lloyd C. W. Monoclonal antibody to intermediate filament antigen cross-reacts with higher plant cells. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1793–1798. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. De Mey J., Lambert A. M., Bajer A. S., Moeremans M., De Brabander M. Visualization of microtubules in interphase and mitotic plant cells of Haemanthus endosperm with the immuno-gold staining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Mar;79(6):1898–1902. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.6.1898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Galatis B., Mitrakos K. On the differential divisions and preprophase microtubule bands involved in the development of stomata of Vigna sinensis L. J Cell Sci. 1979 Jun;37:11–37. doi: 10.1242/jcs.37.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Green P. B. Shifts in plant cell axiality: histogenetic influences on cellulose orientation in the succulent, Graptopetalum. Dev Biol. 1984 May;103(1):18–27. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harris P., Osborn M., Weber K. Distribution of tubulin-containing structures in the egg of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus from fertilization through first cleavage. J Cell Biol. 1980 Mar;84(3):668–679. doi: 10.1083/jcb.84.3.668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hiramoto Y. Analysis of cleavage stimulus by means of micromanipulation of sea urchin eggs. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Oct;68(2):291–298. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90153-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hollenbeck P. J., Cande W. Z. Microtubule distribution and reorganization in the first cell cycle of fertilized eggs of Lytechinus pictus. Eur J Cell Biol. 1985 May;37:140–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KAWAMURA K. Studies on cytokinesis in neuroblasts of the grasshopper, Chortophaga viridifasciata (De Geer). I. Formation and behavior of the mitotic apparatus. Exp Cell Res. 1960 Oct;21:1–18. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(60)90341-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mar H. Radial cortical fibers and pronuclear migration in fertilized and artificially activated eggs of Lytechinus pictus. Dev Biol. 1980 Jul;78(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90313-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pickett-Heaps J. D., McDonald K. L., Tippit D. H. Cell division in the pennate diatom Diatoma vulgare. Protoplasma. 1975;86(1-3):205–242. doi: 10.1007/BF01275633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Porter K. R. Microtubules in intracellular locomotion. Ciba Found Symp. 1973;14:149–169. doi: 10.1002/9780470719978.ch7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rappaport R. Cytokinesis in animal cells. Int Rev Cytol. 1971;31:169–213. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60059-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rappaport R., Rappaport B. N. Division of constricted and urethane-treated sand dollar eggs: a test of the polar stimulation hypothesis. J Exp Zool. 1984 Jul;231(1):81–92. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402310111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rappaport R., Rappaport B. N. Establishment of cleavage furrows by the mitotic spindle. J Exp Zool. 1974 Aug;189(2):189–196. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401890206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schatten G., Schatten H. Effects of motility inhibitors during sea urchin fertilization: microfilament inhibitors prevent sperm incorporation and restructuring of fertilized egg cortex, whereas microtubule inhibitors prevent pronuclear migrations. Exp Cell Res. 1981 Oct;135(2):311–330. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(81)90167-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Soranno T., Pickett-Heaps J. Directionally controlled spindle disassembly after mitosis in the diatom Pinnularia. Eur J Cell Biol. 1982 Feb;26(2):234–243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Spiegelman B. M., Lopata M. A., Kirschner M. W. Aggregation of microtubule initiation sites preceding neurite outgrowth in mouse neuroblastoma cells. Cell. 1979 Feb;16(2):253–263. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tippit D. H., Pickett-Heaps J. D. Mitosis in the pennate diatom Surirella ovalis. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jun;73(3):705–727. doi: 10.1083/jcb.73.3.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wick S. M., Seagull R. W., Osborn M., Weber K., Gunning B. E. Immunofluorescence microscopy of organized microtubule arrays in structurally stabilized meristematic plant cells. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jun;89(3):685–690. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.3.685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES