Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1986 Jun 1;102(6):2176–2184. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.6.2176

Membrane protein redistribution during Xenopus first cleavage

PMCID: PMC2114256  PMID: 3711145

Abstract

A large increase in surface area must accompany formation of the amphibian embryo first cleavage furrow. The additional membrane for this areal expansion has been thought to be provided entirely from cytoplasmic stores during furrowing. We have radioiodinated surface proteins of fertilized, precleavage Xenopus laevis embryos and followed their redistribution during first cleavage by autoradiography. Near the end of first cleavage, membrane of the outer, pigmented surface of the embryo and a short band of membrane at the leading edge of the furrow displayed a high silver grain density, but the remainder of the furrow membrane was lightly labeled. The membrane of the cleavage furrow is thus mosaic in character; the membrane at the leading edge originates in part from the surface of the zygote, but most of the membrane lining the furrow walls is derived from a source inaccessible to surface radioiodination. The furrow membrane adjacent to the outer, pigmented surface consistently showed a very low silver grain density and was underlain by large membranous vesicles, suggesting that new membrane derived from cytoplasmic precursors is inserted primarily in this location, at least during the later phase of cleavage. Radioiodinated membrane proteins and surface-attached carbon particles, which lie in the path of the future furrow, contract toward the animal pole in the initial stages of cleavage while markers in other regions do not. We suggest that the domain of heavily labeled membrane at the leading edge of the definitive furrow contains the labeled elements that are gathered at the animal pole during the initial surface contraction and that they include membrane anchors for the underlying contractile ring of microfilaments.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong P. B., Roberson M. M., Nuccitelli R., Kline D. Adhesion and polarity of amphibian embryo blastomeres. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;85(Pt B):235–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bluemink J. G., Tertoolen L. G., Ververgaert P. H., Verkleij A. J. Freeze-fracture electron microscopy of preexisting and nascent cell membrane in cleaving eggs of Xenopus laevis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Aug 4;443(1):143–155. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90498-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bluemink J. G. The first cleavage of the amphibian egg. An electron microscope study of the onset of cytokinesis in the egg of Ambystoma mexicanum. J Ultrastruct Res. 1970 Jul;32(1):142–166. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(70)80042-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bluemink J. G., de Laat S. W. New membrane formation during cytokinesis in normal and cytochalasin B-treated eggs of Xenopus laevis. I. Electron microscope observations. J Cell Biol. 1973 Oct;59(1):89–108. doi: 10.1083/jcb.59.1.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Darribere T., Boucaut J. C., Keil-Dlouha V. Cell surface proteins in the early embryogenesis of Pleurodeles waltlii. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982 Apr 7;686(2):145–152. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(82)90106-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fraker P. J., Speck J. C., Jr Protein and cell membrane iodinations with a sparingly soluble chloroamide, 1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-3a,6a-diphrenylglycoluril. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Feb 28;80(4):849–857. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(78)91322-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kalt M. R. The relationship between cleavage and blastocoel formation in Xenopus laevis. II. Electron microscopic observations. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1971 Aug;26(1):51–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kline D., Robinson K. R., Nuccitelli R. Ion currents and membrane domains in the cleaving Xenopus egg. J Cell Biol. 1983 Dec;97(6):1753–1761. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.6.1753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lopo A. C., Vacquier V. D. Antibody to a sperm surface glycoprotein inhibits the egg jelly-induced acrosome reaction of sea urchin sperm. Dev Biol. 1980 Oct;79(2):325–333. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90119-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Markwell M. A., Fox C. F. Surface-specific iodination of membrane proteins of viruses and eucaryotic cells using 1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-3alpha,6alpha-diphenylglycoluril. Biochemistry. 1978 Oct 31;17(22):4807–4817. doi: 10.1021/bi00615a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nagata T., Nawa T., Yokota S. A new technique for electron microscopic dry-mounting radioautography of soluble-compounds. Histochemie. 1969;18(3):241–249. doi: 10.1007/BF00306170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roberson M. M., Armstrong P. B. Carbohydrate-binding component of amphibian embryo cell surfaces: restriction to surface regions capable of cell adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jun;77(6):3460–3463. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Roberson M. M., Armstrong P. B. Regional segregation of ConA receptors on dissociated amphibian embryo cells. Exp Cell Res. 1979 Aug;122(1):23–29. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(79)90556-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sanders E. J., Dicaprio R. A. A freeze-fracture and concanavalin A-binding study of the membrane of cleaving Xenopus embryos. Differentiation. 1976 Nov 2;7(1):13–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1977.tb01492.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sawai T. Movement of the cell surface and change in surface area during cleavage in the newt's egg. J Cell Sci. 1976 Aug;21(3):537–551. doi: 10.1242/jcs.21.3.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schroeder T. E. The contractile ring. II. Determining its brief existence, volumetric changes, and vital role in cleaving Arbacia eggs. J Cell Biol. 1972 May;53(2):419–434. doi: 10.1083/jcb.53.2.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Singal P. K., Sanders E. J. Cytomembranes in first cleavage Xenopus embryos. Interrelationship between Golgi bodies, endoplasmic reticulum and lipid droplets. Cell Tissue Res. 1974;154(2):189–209. doi: 10.1007/BF00223164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Spornitz U. M. Lamellar bodies in oocytes of Xenopus laevis and their relation to the mode of fixation. Experientia. 1973 May 15;29(5):589–591. doi: 10.1007/BF01926683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. White J. G., Borisy G. G. On the mechanisms of cytokinesis in animal cells. J Theor Biol. 1983 Mar 21;101(2):289–316. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(83)90342-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. de Laat W. S., Bluemink J. G. New membrane formation during cytokinesis in normal and cytochalasin B-treated eggs of Xenopus laevis. II. Electrophysiological observations. J Cell Biol. 1974 Mar;60(3):529–540. doi: 10.1083/jcb.60.3.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES