Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1986 Nov 1;103(5):1873–1881. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.5.1873

The reproduction of centrosomes: nuclear versus cytoplasmic controls

PMCID: PMC2114374  PMID: 3782286

Abstract

The tight coordination normally found between nuclear events and the doubling of centrosomes at each cell cycle suggests that nuclear activities may be part of the mechanism that controls the reproduction of centrosomes. To determine if this is the case, we used a micropipette to completely remove the nucleus from eggs of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus at prophase of the first mitosis, leaving only one centrosome in the cell. The subsequent behavior of this centrosome was then followed in vivo with the polarization microscope. In all cases the centrosome reproduced in a precise 1:2:4:8 fashion with a periodicity that was slightly slower than the centrosome cycle of control eggs. The cell cycle-related changes in centrosome morphology were identical to those of control eggs in that: (a) the astral birefringence varied cyclically to a normal extent, (b) the astral focus enlarged and then flattened during the telophase equivalent, (c) cleavage furrows were initiated as the astral birefringence faded, and (d) daughter centrosomes separated before the increase in astral birefringence at the onset of each mitosis. To determine if centrioles also reproduced normally, enucleate eggs were followed in vivo until they contained eight centrosomes. They were then individually removed from the preparations, fixed, and embedded. Each egg was serially 0.25-micron sectioned for observation with the high voltage electron microscope. We completely reconstructed 23 centrosomes in four eggs; all centrosomes contained two centrioles apiece. These results demonstrate that the subunits for complete centrosome assembly can be stockpiled ahead of time and that the properly controlled use of these subunits for centrosome reproduction does not require nuclear transcription or nuclear DNA synthesis at each cell cycle.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berns M. W., Rattner J. B., Brenner S., Meredith S. The role of the centriolar region in animal cell mitosis. A laser microbeam study. J Cell Biol. 1977 Feb;72(2):351–367. doi: 10.1083/jcb.72.2.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berns M. W., Richardson S. M. Continuation of mitosis after selective laser microbeam destruction of the centriolar region. J Cell Biol. 1977 Dec;75(3):977–982. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.3.977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brachet J., de Petrocellis B. The effects of aphidicolin, an inhibitor of DNA replication, on sea urchin development. Exp Cell Res. 1981 Sep;135(1):179–189. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(81)90310-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DeFoor P. H., Stubblefield E. Effects of actinomycin D, amethopterin, and 5-fluro-2'-deoxyuridine on procentriole formation in Chinese hamster fibroblasts in culture. Exp Cell Res. 1974 Mar 30;85(1):136–142. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90223-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dippell R. V. Effects of nuclease and protease digestion on the ultrastructure of Paramecium basal bodies. J Cell Biol. 1976 Jun;69(3):622–637. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.3.622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fuseler J. W. Repetitive procurement of mature gametes from individual sea stars and sea urchins. J Cell Biol. 1973 Jun;57(3):879–881. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.3.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GROSS P. R. THE IMMEDIACY OF GENOMIC CONTROL DURING EARLY DEVELOPMENT. J Exp Zool. 1964 Oct;157:21–41. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401570107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gould R. R., Borisy G. G. The pericentriolar material in Chinese hamster ovary cells nucleates microtubule formation. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jun;73(3):601–615. doi: 10.1083/jcb.73.3.601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HIRAMOTO Y. Microinjection of the live spermatozoa into sea urchin eggs. Exp Cell Res. 1962 Sep;27:416–426. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(62)90006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heidemann S. R., Sander G., Kirschner M. W. Evidence for a functional role of RNA in centrioles. Cell. 1977 Mar;10(3):337–350. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ikegami S., Amemiya S., Oguro M., Nagano H., Mano Y. Inhibition by aphidicolin of cell cycle progression and DNA replication in sea urchin embryos. J Cell Physiol. 1979 Sep;100(3):439–444. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041000307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kiehart D. P. Microinjection of echinoderm eggs: apparatus and procedures. Methods Cell Biol. 1982;25(Pt B):13–31. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61418-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Krystal G. W., Poccia D. Control of chromosome condensation in the sea urchin egg. Exp Cell Res. 1979 Oct 15;123(2):207–219. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(79)90461-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuriyama R., Borisy G. G. Centriole cycle in Chinese hamster ovary cells as determined by whole-mount electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1981 Dec;91(3 Pt 1):814–821. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nagano H., Hirai S., Okano K., Ikegami S. Achromosomal cleavage of fertilized starfish eggs in the presence of aphidicolin. Dev Biol. 1981 Jul 30;85(2):409–415. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90272-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nishioka D., Balczon R., Schatten G. Relationships between DNA synthesis and mitotic events in fertilized sea urchin eggs: aphidicolin inhibits DNA synthesis, nuclear breakdown and proliferation of microtubule organizing centers, but not cycles of microtubule assembly. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1984 Apr;8(4):337–346. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(84)90161-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Paweletz N., Mazia D., Finze E. M. The centrosome cycle in the mitotic cycle of sea urchin eggs. Exp Cell Res. 1984 May;152(1):47–65. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(84)90229-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peterson S. P., Berns M. W. Evidence for centriolar region RNA functioning in spindle formation in dividing PTK2 cells. J Cell Sci. 1978 Dec;34:289–301. doi: 10.1242/jcs.34.1.289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. REICH E., FRANKLIN R. M., SHATKIN A. J., TATUMEL Action of actinomycin D on animal cells and viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Jul 15;48:1238–1245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.7.1238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rattner J. B., Phillips S. G. Independence of centriole formation and DNA synthesis. J Cell Biol. 1973 May;57(2):359–372. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.2.359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rieder C. L. Ribonucleoprotein staining of centrioles and kinetochores in newt lung cell spindles. J Cell Biol. 1979 Jan;80(1):1–9. doi: 10.1083/jcb.80.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sluder G., Begg D. A. Experimental analysis of the reproduction of spindle poles. J Cell Sci. 1985 Jun;76:35–51. doi: 10.1242/jcs.76.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sluder G., Rieder C. L. Centriole number and the reproductive capacity of spindle poles. J Cell Biol. 1985 Mar;100(3):887–896. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.3.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sluder G. Role of spindle microtubules in the control of cell cycle timing. J Cell Biol. 1979 Mar;80(3):674–691. doi: 10.1083/jcb.80.3.674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Snyder J. A. Evidence for a ribonucleoprotein complex as a template for microtubule initiation in vivo. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1980 Sep;4(9):859–868. doi: 10.1016/0309-1651(80)90184-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES