Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1987 Feb 1;104(2):371–379. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.2.371

The distribution of acetylcholine receptor clusters and sites of transmitter release along chick ciliary ganglion neurite-myotube contacts in culture

PMCID: PMC2114411  PMID: 3805125

Abstract

Acetylcholine receptors accumulate along the length of cholinergic neuron-skeletal muscle contacts in vitro. The main purpose of this study was to describe, in a quantitative way, the distribution of acetylcholine receptor clusters induced by ciliary ganglion neurons over a period of time extending from hours to weeks after contacts are established. Neurites were filled with Lucifer Yellow and receptor clusters were identified with rhodamine-bungarotoxin. A cluster located within 5 micron of a nerve process or 10 micron of the base of a growth cone was considered to be a neurite-associated receptor patch (NARP). The first synaptic potentials were evoked 20 min after growth cone- myotube contact, and, after 24 h of co-culture, greater than 60% of the nerve-muscle pairs tested were functionally connected. NARPs appear rapidly; the first clusters were detected approximately 6 h after the neurons were plated. They were composed of several small subclusters or speckles of rhodamine-bungarotoxin fluorescence. The initial accumulation of receptors may occur at the advancing tips of nerve processes because NARPs were found at greater than 80% of the growth cone-muscle contacts examined between 12 and 24 h of co-culture. Over the 3-wk period examined, the mean incidence of NARPs ranged between 1.0 and 2.6 per 100 micron of neurite-myotube contact, with the peak observed on the second day of co-culture. During the first 3 d in culture, when the neurons were multipolar, nearly all of the primary processes induced one or more clusters. With time, as the neurons become unipolar (Role and Fischbach, 1987) NARPs persisted along the remaining dominant process. Measurements made during the third day of co-culture suggest that NARPs disappear along shorter neurites before they retract. Synaptic currents were detected by focal extracellular recording at 55% of the NARPs. The fact that spontaneous or evoked responses were not recorded at 45% suggests that contacts with clusters exhibit two functional states. Two types of presynaptic specialization at identified NARPs observed by scanning electron microscopy appear to be correlated with the functional state.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson M. J., Cohen M. W. Nerve-induced and spontaneous redistribution of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;268(3):757–773. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson M. J., Cohen M. W., Zorychta E. Effects of innervation on the distribution of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;268(3):731–756. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson M. J., Kidokoro Y., Gruener R. Correlation between acetylcholine receptor localization and spontaneous synaptic potentials in cultures of nerve and muscle. Brain Res. 1979 Apr 20;166(1):185–190. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90662-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson M. J., Klier F. G., Tanguay K. E. Acetylcholine receptor aggregation parallels the deposition of a basal lamina proteoglycan during development of the neuromuscular junction. J Cell Biol. 1984 Nov;99(5):1769–1784. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.5.1769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bader C. R., Bertrand D., Kato A. C. Chick ciliary ganglion in dissociated cell culture. II. Electrophysiological properties. Dev Biol. 1982 Nov;94(1):131–141. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90076-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buc-Caron M. H., Nystrom P., Fischbach G. D. Induction of acetylcholine receptor synthesis and aggregation: partial purification of low-molecular-weight activity. Dev Biol. 1983 Feb;95(2):378–386. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90039-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bursztajn S., Fischbach G. D. Evidence that coated vesicles transport acetylcholine receptors to the surface membrane of chick myotubes. J Cell Biol. 1984 Feb;98(2):498–506. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.2.498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen M. W. Development of an amphibian neuromuscular junction in vivo and in culture. J Exp Biol. 1980 Dec;89:43–56. doi: 10.1242/jeb.89.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen M. W., Weldon P. R. Localization of acetylcholine receptors and synaptic ultrastructure at nerve-muscle contacts in culture: dependence on nerve type. J Cell Biol. 1980 Aug;86(2):388–401. doi: 10.1083/jcb.86.2.388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen S. A., Fischbach G. D. Clusters of acetylcholine receptors located at identified nerve-muscle synapses in vitro. Dev Biol. 1977 Aug;59(1):24–38. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90237-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fischbach G. D., Cohen S. A. The distribution of acetylcholine sensitivity over uninnervated and innervated muscle fibers grown in cell culture. Dev Biol. 1973 Mar;31(1):147–162. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90326-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fischbach G. D., Frank E., Jessell T. M., Rubin L. L., Schuetze S. M. Accumulation of acetylcholine receptors and acetylcholinesterase at newly formed nerve-muscle synapses. Pharmacol Rev. 1978 Dec;30(4):411–428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Frank E., Fischbach G. D. Early events in neuromuscular junction formation in vitro: induction of acetylcholine receptor clusters in the postsynaptic membrane and morphology of newly formed synapses. J Cell Biol. 1979 Oct;83(1):143–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Heuser J. E., Reese T. S., Dennis M. J., Jan Y., Jan L., Evans L. Synaptic vesicle exocytosis captured by quick freezing and correlated with quantal transmitter release. J Cell Biol. 1979 May;81(2):275–300. doi: 10.1083/jcb.81.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hume R. I., Role L. W., Fischbach G. D. Acetylcholine release from growth cones detected with patches of acetylcholine receptor-rich membranes. Nature. 1983 Oct 13;305(5935):632–634. doi: 10.1038/305632a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jacob M., Lentz T. L. Localization of acetylcholine receptors by means of horseradish peroxidase-alpha-bungarotoxin during formation and development of the neuromuscular junction in the chick embryo. J Cell Biol. 1979 Jul;82(1):195–211. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.1.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jessell T. M., Siegel R. E., Fischbach G. D. Induction of acetylcholine receptors on cultured skeletal muscle by a factor extracted from brain and spinal cord. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5397–5401. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Katz B., Miledi R. Estimates of quantal content during 'chemical potentiation' of transmitter release. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Aug 31;205(1160):369–378. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuromi H., Kidokoro Y. Nerve disperses preexisting acetylcholine receptor clusters prior to induction of receptor accumulation in Xenopus muscle cultures. Dev Biol. 1984 May;103(1):53–61. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Landmesser L., Pilar G. Fate of ganglionic synapses and ganglion cell axons during normal and induced cell death. J Cell Biol. 1976 Feb;68(2):357–374. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.2.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Landmesser L., Pilar G. Synapse formation during embryogenesis on ganglion cells lacking a periphery. J Physiol. 1974 Sep;241(3):715–736. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Margiotta J. F., Berg D. K. Functional synapses are established between ciliary ganglion neurones in dissociated cell culture. Nature. 1982 Mar 11;296(5853):152–154. doi: 10.1038/296152a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Marwitt R., Pilar G., Weakly J. N. Characterization of two ganglion cell populations in avian ciliary ganglia. Brain Res. 1971 Jan 22;25(2):317–334. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90441-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moody-Corbett F., Cohen M. W. Influence of nerve on the formation and survival of acetylcholine receptor and cholinesterase patches on embryonic Xenopus muscle cells in culture. J Neurosci. 1982 May;2(5):633–646. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.02-05-00633.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nishi R., Berg D. K. Dissociated ciliary ganglion neurons in vitro: survival and synapse formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Nov;74(11):5171–5175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.11.5171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pilar G., Landmesser L., Burstein L. Competition for survival among developing ciliary ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol. 1980 Jan;43(1):233–254. doi: 10.1152/jn.1980.43.1.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pilar G., Vaughan P. C. Electrophysiological investigations of the pigeon iris neuromuscular junctions. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1969 Apr;29(1):51–72. doi: 10.1016/0010-406x(69)91725-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pilar G., Vaughan P. C. Mechanical responses of the pigeon iris muscle fibres. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1969 Apr;29(1):73–87. doi: 10.1016/0010-406x(69)91726-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pilar G., Vaughan P. C. Ultrastructure and contractures of the pigeon iris striated muscle. J Physiol. 1971 Dec;219(2):253–266. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Role L. W., Fischbach G. D. Changes in the number of chick ciliary ganglion neuron processes with time in cell culture. J Cell Biol. 1987 Feb;104(2):363–370. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.2.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Role L. W., Matossian V. R., O'Brien R. J., Fischbach G. D. On the mechanism of acetylcholine receptor accumulation at newly formed synapses on chick myotubes. J Neurosci. 1985 Aug;5(8):2197–2204. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-08-02197.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Smith M. A., Slater C. R. Spatial distribution of acetylcholine receptors at developing chick neuromuscular junctions. J Neurocytol. 1983 Dec;12(6):993–1005. doi: 10.1007/BF01153346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tuttle J. B., Suszkiw J. B., Ard M. Long-term survival and development of dissociated parasympathetic neurons in culture. Brain Res. 1980 Feb 3;183(1):161–180. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90127-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Young S. H., Poo M. M. Spontaneous release of transmitter from growth cones of embryonic neurones. Nature. 1983 Oct 13;305(5935):634–637. doi: 10.1038/305634a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ziskind-Conhaim L., Geffen I., Hall Z. W. Redistribution of acetylcholine receptors on developing rat myotubes. J Neurosci. 1984 Sep;4(9):2346–2349. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-09-02346.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES