Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1987 Mar 1;104(3):557–564. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.3.557

Functional gap junctions are not required for muscle gene activation by induction in Xenopus embryos

PMCID: PMC2114533  PMID: 3818792

Abstract

Muscle gene expression is known to be induced in animal pole cells of a Xenopus blastula after 2-3 h of close contact with vegetal pole cells. We tested whether this induction requires functional gap junctions between vegetal and animal portions of an animal-vegetal conjugate. Muscle gene transcription was assayed with a muscle-specific actin gene probe and the presence or absence of communication through gap junctions was determined electrophysiologically. Antibodies to gap junction protein were shown to block gap junction communication for the whole of the induction time, but did not prevent successful induction of muscle gene activation. The outcome was the same whether communication between inducing vegetal cells and responding animal cells was blocked by introducing antibodies into vegetal cells alone or into animal cells alone. We conclude that gap junctions are not required for this example of embryonic induction.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dale L., Smith J. C., Slack J. M. Mesoderm induction in Xenopus laevis: a quantitative study using a cell lineage label and tissue-specific antibodies. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985 Oct;89:289–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gurdon J. B., Fairman S., Mohun T. J., Brennan S. Activation of muscle-specific actin genes in Xenopus development by an induction between animal and vegetal cells of a blastula. Cell. 1985 Jul;41(3):913–922. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80072-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gurdon J. B. Methods for nuclear transplantation in amphibia. Methods Cell Biol. 1977;16:125–139. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60096-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Melton D. A., Krieg P. A., Rebagliati M. R., Maniatis T., Zinn K., Green M. R. Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Sep 25;12(18):7035–7056. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.18.7035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mohun T. J., Brennan S., Dathan N., Fairman S., Gurdon J. B. Cell type-specific activation of actin genes in the early amphibian embryo. Nature. 1984 Oct 25;311(5988):716–721. doi: 10.1038/311716a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nieuwkoop P. D. Origin and establishment of embryonic polar axes in amphibian development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1977;11:115–132. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60744-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Palmer J. F., Slack C. Some bio-electric parameters of early Xenopus embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1970 Nov;24(3):535–553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sargent T. D., Jamrich M., Dawid I. B. Cell interactions and the control of gene activity during early development of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1986 Mar;114(1):238–246. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90399-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Slack C., Warner A. E. Properties of surface and junctional membranes of embryonic cells isolated from blastula stages of Xenopus laevis. J Physiol. 1975 Jun;248(1):97–120. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Warner A. E., Guthrie S. C., Gilula N. B. Antibodies to gap-junctional protein selectively disrupt junctional communication in the early amphibian embryo. Nature. 1984 Sep 13;311(5982):127–131. doi: 10.1038/311127a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Warner A. E. The role of gap junctions in amphibian development. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985 Nov;89 (Suppl):365–380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES