Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1987 Mar 1;104(3):739–748. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.3.739

The solution to the cytological paradox of isomorphy

PMCID: PMC2114552  PMID: 3818798

Abstract

Cells with polyploid nuclei are generally larger than cells of the same organism or species with nonpolyploid nuclei. However, no such change of cell size with ploidy level is observed in those red algae which alternate isomorphic haploid with diploid generations. The results of this investigation reveal the explanation. Nuclear DNA content and other parameters were measured in cells of the filamentous red alga Griffithsia pacifica. Nuclei of the diploid generation contain twice the DNA content of those of the haploid generation. However, all cells except newly formed reproductive cells are multinucleate. The nuclei are arranged in a nearly perfect hexagonal array just beneath the cell surface. When homologous cells of the two generations are compared, although the cell size is nearly identical, each nucleus of the diploid cell is surrounded by a region of cytoplasm (a "domain") nearly twice that surrounding a haploid nucleus. Cytoplasmic domains associated with a diploid nucleus contain twice the number of plastids, and consequently twice the amount of plastid DNA, than is associated with the domain of a haploid nucleus. Thus, doubling of ploidy is reflected in doubling of the size and organelle content of the domain associated with each nucleus. However, cell size does not differ between homologous cells of the two generations, because total nuclear DNA (sum of the DNA in all nuclei in a cell) per cell does not differ. This is the solution to the cytological paradox of isomorphy.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bennett M. D. Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1972 Jun 6;181(1063):109–135. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1972.0042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COMMONER B. ROLES OF DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID IN INHERITANCE. Nature. 1964 Jun 6;202:960–968. doi: 10.1038/202960a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cavalier-Smith T. Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox. J Cell Sci. 1978 Dec;34:247–278. doi: 10.1242/jcs.34.1.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clutterbuck A. J. Cell volume per nucleus in haploid and diploid strains of Aspergillus nidulans. J Gen Microbiol. 1969 Feb;55(2):291–299. doi: 10.1099/00221287-55-2-291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coleman A. W., Maguire M. J., Coleman J. R. Mithramycin- and 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-DNA staining for fluorescence microspectrophotometric measurement of DNA in nuclei, plastids, and virus particles. J Histochem Cytochem. 1981 Aug;29(8):959–968. doi: 10.1177/29.8.6168681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Epstein C. J. Cell size, nuclear content, and the development of polyploidy in the Mammalian liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Feb;57(2):327–334. doi: 10.1073/pnas.57.2.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Epstein C. J., Gatens E. A. Nuclear ploidy in mammalian parenchymal liver cells. Nature. 1967 Jun 3;214(5092):1050–1051. doi: 10.1038/2141050a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fantes P. A., Grant W. D., Pritchard R. H., Sudbery P. E., Wheals A. E. The regulation of cell size and the control of mitosis. J Theor Biol. 1975 Mar;50(1):213–244. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90034-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GREEN P. B. Multinet growth in the cell wall of Nitella. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1960 Apr;7:289–296. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.2.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gertel E. T., Green P. B. Cell growth pattern and wall microfibrillar arrangement: experiments with nitella. Plant Physiol. 1977 Aug;60(2):247–254. doi: 10.1104/pp.60.2.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goff L. J., Coleman A. W. Elucidation of fertilization and development in a red alga by quantitative DNA microspectrofluorometry. Dev Biol. 1984 Mar;102(1):173–194. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90183-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gunge N., Nakatomi Y. Genetic Mechanisms of Rare Matings of the Yeast SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE Heterozygous for Mating Type. Genetics. 1972 Jan;70(1):41–58. doi: 10.1093/genetics/70.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Holm-Hansen O. Algae: amounts of DNA and organic carbon in single cells. Science. 1969 Jan 3;163(3862):87–88. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3862.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Login G. R. Microwave fixation versus formalin fixation of surgical and autopsy tissue. Am J Med Technol. 1978 May;44(5):435–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Olmo E., Morescalchi A. Evolution of the genome and cell sizes in salamanders. Experientia. 1975 Jul 15;31(7):804–806. doi: 10.1007/BF01938475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pedersen R. A. DNA content, ribosomal gene multiplicity, and cell size in fish. J Exp Zool. 1971 May;177(1):65–78. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401770108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sweeney G. D., Cole F. M., Freeman K. B., Patel H. V. Heterogeneity of rat liver parenchymal cells: cell volume as a function of DNA content. J Lab Clin Med. 1979 Nov;94(5):718–725. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Watanabe T., Tanaka Y. Age-related alterations in the size of human hepatocytes. A study of mononuclear and binucleate cells. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol. 1982;39(1):9–20. doi: 10.1007/BF02892832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES