Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1987 Mar 1;104(3):417–430. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.3.417

A mutation affecting basal body duplication and cell shape in Paramecium [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1987 Jun;104(6):1755]

PMCID: PMC2114561  PMID: 3606747

Abstract

The thermosensitive mutant sm19 of Paramecium tetraurelia undergoes a progressive reduction in cell length and basal body number over successive divisions at the nonpermissive temperature of 35 degrees C. In spite of these defects, sm19 cells retain the same generation time as wild-type cells at 35 degrees C. Cytological observations at both electron and light microscopy levels reveal no other perturbation than the rarefaction of basal bodies and the rare (3%) absence of one or two microtubules in basal bodies or ciliary axonemes. The temperature- sensitive period, during the last 30 min of the cell cycle, corresponds to the phase of basal body duplication. Upon transfer back to the permissive temperature, all basal bodies are normally duplicated. The mutational defect is transiently restored by microinjection of wild- type cytoplasm or of a soluble proteic fraction from wild-type cell homogenates. Altogether, the cytological and physiological data support the conclusion that the sm19+ gene codes for a diffusible product required for the initiation of basal body duplication and would thus be the first identified gene involved in this process. Our data also indicate that in Paramecium basal body number is not coupled with control of the cell cycle, but helps determine the shape of the cell via the organization of the cytoskeleton.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BEISSON J., SONNEBORN T. M. CYTOPLASMIC INHERITANCE OF THE ORGANIZATION OF THE CELL CORTEX IN PARAMECIUM AURELIA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Feb;53:275–282. doi: 10.1073/pnas.53.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beisson J., Cohen J., Lefort-Tran M., Pouphile M., Rossignol M. Control of membrane fusion in exocytosis. Physiological studies on a Paramecium mutant blocked in the final step of the trichocyst extrusion process. J Cell Biol. 1980 May;85(2):213–227. doi: 10.1083/jcb.85.2.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berger J. D. Gene expression and phenotypic change in Paramecium tetraurelia exconjugants. Genet Res. 1976 Apr;27(2):123–134. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300016335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen J., Beisson J. Genetic analysis of the relationships between the cell surface and the nuclei in Paramecium tetraurella. Genetics. 1980 Aug;95(4):797–818. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.4.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DIPPELL R. V. A temporary stain for Paramecium and other ciliate protozoa. Stain Technol. 1955 Mar;30(2):69–71. doi: 10.3109/10520295509113746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dippell R. V. The development of basal bodies in paramecium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Oct;61(2):461–468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.2.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Doerder F. P., Frankel J., Jenkins L. M., DeBault L. E. Form and pattern in ciliated protozoa: analysis of a genic mutant with altered cell shape in Tetrahymena pyriformis, Syngen 1. J Exp Zool. 1975 May;192(2):237–258. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401920214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Frankel J. A genically determined abnormality in the number and arrangement of basal bodies in a ciliate. Dev Biol. 1973 Feb;30(2):336–365. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90093-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Giloh H., Sedat J. W. Fluorescence microscopy: reduced photobleaching of rhodamine and fluorescein protein conjugates by n-propyl gallate. Science. 1982 Sep 24;217(4566):1252–1255. doi: 10.1126/science.7112126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodenough U. W., StClair H. S. BALD-2: a mutation affecting the formation of doublet and triplet sets of microtubules in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Cell Biol. 1975 Sep;66(3):480–491. doi: 10.1083/jcb.66.3.480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grimes G. W., McKenna M. E., Goldsmith-Spoegler C. M., Knaupp E. A. Patterning and assembly of ciliature are independent processes in hypotrich ciliates. Science. 1980 Jul 11;209(4453):281–283. doi: 10.1126/science.209.4453.281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hiwatashi K., Haga N., Takahashi M. Restoration of membrane excitability in a behavioral mutant of Paramecium caudatum during conjugation and by microinjection of wild-type cytoplasm. J Cell Biol. 1980 Feb;84(2):476–480. doi: 10.1083/jcb.84.2.476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang B., Ramanis Z., Dutcher S. K., Luck D. J. Uniflagellar mutants of Chlamydomonas: evidence for the role of basal bodies in transmission of positional information. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):745–753. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90436-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang B., Rifkin M. R., Luck D. J. Temperature-sensitive mutations affecting flagellar assembly and function in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jan;72(1):67–85. doi: 10.1083/jcb.72.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jarvik J. W., Chojnacki B. Flagellar morphology in stumpy-flagella mutants of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Protozool. 1985 Nov;32(4):649–656. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1985.tb03095.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Knowles J. K. An improved microinjection technique in Paramecium aurelia. Transfer of mitochondria conferring erythromycin-resistance. Exp Cell Res. 1974 Sep;88(1):79–87. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90620-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuriyama R., Borisy G. G. Centriole cycle in Chinese hamster ovary cells as determined by whole-mount electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1981 Dec;91(3 Pt 1):814–821. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mazia D., Schatten G., Sale W. Adhesion of cells to surfaces coated with polylysine. Applications to electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1975 Jul;66(1):198–200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.66.1.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schliwa M., van Blerkom J. Structural interaction of cytoskeletal components. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jul;90(1):222–235. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.1.222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. WHITSON G. L. TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY AND ITS RELATIONS TO CHANGES IN GROWTH, CONTROL OF CELL DIVISION, AND STABILITY OF MORPHOGENESIS IN PARAMECIUM AURELIA SYNGEN 4 STOCK 51. J Cell Physiol. 1964 Dec;64:455–464. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030640317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wright R. L., Chojnacki B., Jarvik J. W. Abnormal basal-body number, location, and orientation in a striated fiber-defective mutant of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jun;96(6):1697–1707. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.6.1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES