Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1986 Dec 1;103(6):2091–2102. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2091

In vitro transport of a fluorescent nuclear protein and exclusion of non-nuclear proteins

PMCID: PMC2114618  PMID: 3097026

Abstract

An in vitro system was developed that provides a quick microscopic assay for nuclear transport. The assay uses an extract of Xenopus eggs, normal or synthetic nuclei, and a fluorescently labeled nuclear protein, nucleoplasmin. This in vitro system accurately mimics in vivo nuclear transport, both in exclusivity and in the amount of accumulation observed (up to 17-fold). Selective accumulation of fluorescent nucleoplasmin is observed microscopically within 30 min with rat liver nuclei, Xenopus embryonic nuclei, regrown Xenopus sperm nuclei, or nuclei reconstituted in vitro from bacteriophage lambda DNA. This transport requires the signal domain of nucleoplasmin. Furthermore, the ability of nuclei to accumulate nucleoplasmin directly correlates with their ability to exclude the fluorescent non-nuclear proteins, FITC-immunoglobulin and phycoerythrin. An active transport model would predict that nuclear transport be temperature- and energy- dependent and that inhibition of transport by either low temperature or energy depletion would be reversible. Both predictions were confirmed in our system. Nucleoplasmin accumulation increases with temperature, while the protein is completely excluded at 0 degrees C. The effects of low temperature are reversible. As found for 125I-labeled nucleoplasmin (Newmeyer, D. D., J. M. Lucocq, T. R. Burglin, and E. M. De Robertis, 1986, EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J., 5:501-510), transport of fluorescent nucleoplasmin is inhibited by ATP depletion. This effect is reversed by later ATP addition. Under ATP-depleted conditions non- nuclear proteins continue to be excluded. These results argue for a direct role of ATP in transport rather than for a simple role in preserving envelope integrity. In a first step towards defining the minimum requirements for a transport medium, egg extracts were depleted of membrane vesicles. Membrane-depleted extracts neither support transport nor maintain the integrity of the nuclear envelope.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aaronson R. P., Blobel G. On the attachment of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol. 1974 Sep;62(3):746–754. doi: 10.1083/jcb.62.3.746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blobel G., Potter V. R. Nuclei from rat liver: isolation method that combines purity with high yield. Science. 1966 Dec 30;154(3757):1662–1665. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3757.1662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bonner W. M. Protein migration into nuclei. I. Frog oocyte nuclei in vivo accumulate microinjected histones, allow entry to small proteins, and exclude large proteins. J Cell Biol. 1975 Feb;64(2):421–430. doi: 10.1083/jcb.64.2.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burke B., Gerace L. A cell free system to study reassembly of the nuclear envelope at the end of mitosis. Cell. 1986 Feb 28;44(4):639–652. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90273-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Robertis E. M. Nucleocytoplasmic segregation of proteins and RNAs. Cell. 1983 Apr;32(4):1021–1025. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90285-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dingwall C., Sharnick S. V., Laskey R. A. A polypeptide domain that specifies migration of nucleoplasmin into the nucleus. Cell. 1982 Sep;30(2):449–458. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90242-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Einck L., Bustin M. Functional histone antibody fragments traverse the nuclear envelope. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jan;98(1):205–213. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.1.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feldherr C. M., Cohen R. J., Ogburn J. A. Evidence for mediated protein uptake by amphibian oocyte nuclei. J Cell Biol. 1983 May;96(5):1486–1490. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.5.1486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feldherr C. M., Kallenbach E., Schultz N. Movement of a karyophilic protein through the nuclear pores of oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2216–2222. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Feldherr C. M., Ogburn J. A. Mechanism for the selection of nuclear polypeptides in Xenopus oocytes. II. Two-dimensional gel analysis. J Cell Biol. 1980 Dec;87(3 Pt 1):589–593. doi: 10.1083/jcb.87.3.589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Feldherr C. M., Richmond P. A., Noonan K. D. The distribution of ConA-binding sites on oocyte nuclear envelopes. Exp Cell Res. 1977 Jul;107(2):439–444. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(77)90367-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Forbes D. J., Kirschner M. W., Newport J. W. Spontaneous formation of nucleus-like structures around bacteriophage DNA microinjected into Xenopus eggs. Cell. 1983 Aug;34(1):13–23. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90132-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Franke W. W., Scheer U., Krohne G., Jarasch E. D. The nuclear envelope and the architecture of the nuclear periphery. J Cell Biol. 1981 Dec;91(3 Pt 2):39s–50s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.39s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gerace L., Blobel G. The nuclear envelope lamina is reversibly depolymerized during mitosis. Cell. 1980 Jan;19(1):277–287. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90409-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gerace L., Ottaviano Y., Kondor-Koch C. Identification of a major polypeptide of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol. 1982 Dec;95(3):826–837. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.3.826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall M. N., Hereford L., Herskowitz I. Targeting of E. coli beta-galactosidase to the nucleus in yeast. Cell. 1984 Apr;36(4):1057–1065. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90055-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang L. W., Schindler M. Chemical factors that influence nucleocytoplasmic transport: a fluorescence photobleaching study. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):853–858. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kalderon D., Roberts B. L., Richardson W. D., Smith A. E. A short amino acid sequence able to specify nuclear location. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(3 Pt 2):499–509. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90457-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Krohne G., Franke W. W. Immunological identification and localization of the predominant nuclear protein of the amphibian oocyte nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Feb;77(2):1034–1038. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.2.1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lang I., Scholz M., Peters R. Molecular mobility and nucleocytoplasmic flux in hepatoma cells. J Cell Biol. 1986 Apr;102(4):1183–1190. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.4.1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lohka M. J., Masui Y. Formation in vitro of sperm pronuclei and mitotic chromosomes induced by amphibian ooplasmic components. Science. 1983 May 13;220(4598):719–721. doi: 10.1126/science.6601299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lohka M. J., Masui Y. Roles of cytosol and cytoplasmic particles in nuclear envelope assembly and sperm pronuclear formation in cell-free preparations from amphibian eggs. J Cell Biol. 1984 Apr;98(4):1222–1230. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.4.1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Maul G. G. The nuclear and the cytoplasmic pore complex: structure, dynamics, distribution, and evolution. Int Rev Cytol Suppl. 1977;(6):75–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Miake-Lye R., Newport J., Kirschner M. Maturation-promoting factor induces nuclear envelope breakdown in cycloheximide-arrested embryos of Xenopus laevis. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jul;97(1):81–91. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mills A. D., Laskey R. A., Black P., De Robertis E. M. An acidic protein which assembles nucleosomes in vitro is the most abundant protein in Xenopus oocyte nuclei. J Mol Biol. 1980 May 25;139(3):561–568. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90148-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Newmeyer D. D., Lucocq J. M., Bürglin T. R., De Robertis E. M. Assembly in vitro of nuclei active in nuclear protein transport: ATP is required for nucleoplasmin accumulation. EMBO J. 1986 Mar;5(3):501–510. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04239.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Newport J., Spann T., Kanki J., Forbes D. The role of mitotic factors in regulating the timing of the midblastula transition in Xenopus. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1985;50:651–656. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1985.050.01.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nigg E. A., Hilz H., Eppenberger H. M., Dutly F. Rapid and reversible translocation of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase type II from the Golgi complex to the nucleus. EMBO J. 1985 Nov;4(11):2801–2806. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb04006.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Paine P. L., Moore L. C., Horowitz S. B. Nuclear envelope permeability. Nature. 1975 Mar 13;254(5496):109–114. doi: 10.1038/254109a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schindler M., Holland J. F., Hogan M. Lateral diffusion in nuclear membranes. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1408–1414. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schindler M., Jiang L. W. Nuclear actin and myosin as control elements in nucleocytoplasmic transport. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):859–862. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Seve A. P., Hubert J., Bouvier D., Masson C., Geraud G., Bouteille M. In situ distribution in different cell types of nuclear glycoconjugates detected by two lectins. J Submicrosc Cytol. 1984 Oct;16(4):631–641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stevens B. J., Swift H. RNA transport from nucleus to cytoplasm in Chironomus salivary glands. J Cell Biol. 1966 Oct;31(1):55–77. doi: 10.1083/jcb.31.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Velazquez J. M., Lindquist S. hsp70: nuclear concentration during environmental stress and cytoplasmic storage during recovery. Cell. 1984 Mar;36(3):655–662. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90345-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Virtanen I., Wartiovaara J. Distribution of lectin binding sites on rat liver cell nuclei: comparison of fluorescein- and ferritin-labelling methods. Cell Mol Biol Incl Cyto Enzymol. 1978;23(1):73–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Virtanen I., Wartiovaara J. Lectin receptor sites on rat liver cell nuclear membranes. J Cell Sci. 1976 Nov;22(2):335–344. doi: 10.1242/jcs.22.2.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES