Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1987 Aug 1;105(2):937–947. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.2.937

Heterokaryon analysis of muscle differentiation: regulation of the postmitotic state

PMCID: PMC2114765  PMID: 3624312

Abstract

MM14 mouse myoblasts withdraw irreversibly from the cell cycle and become postmitotic within a few hours of being deprived of fibroblast growth factor (Clegg, C. H., T. A. Linkhart, B. B. Olwin, and S. D. Hauschka, 1987, J. Cell Biol., 105:949-956). To examine the mechanisms that may regulate this developmental state of skeletal muscle, we tested the mitogen responsiveness of various cell types after their polyethylene glycol-mediated fusion with post-mitotic myocytes. Heterokaryons containing myocytes and quiescent nonmyogenic cells such as 3T3, L cell, and a differentiation-defective myoblast line (DD-1) responded to mitogen-rich medium by initiating DNA synthesis. Myonuclei replicated DNA and reexpressed thymidine kinase. In contrast, (myocyte x G1 myoblast) heterokaryons failed to replicate DNA in mitogen-rich medium and became postmitotic. This included cells with a nuclear ratio of three myoblasts to one myocyte. Proliferation dominance in (myocyte x 3T3 cell) and (myocyte x DD-1) heterokaryons was conditionally regulated by the timing of mitogen treatment; such cells became postmitotic when mitogen exposure was delayed for as little as 6 h after cell fusion. In addition, (myocyte x DD-1) heterokaryons expressed a muscle-specific trait and lost epidermal growth factor receptors when they became postmitotic. These results demonstrate that DNA synthesis is not irreversibly blocked in skeletal muscle; myonuclei readily express proliferation-related functions when provided with a mitogenic signal. Rather, myocyte-specific repression of DNA synthesis in heterokaryons argues that the postmitotic state of skeletal muscle is regulated by diffusible factors that inhibit processes of cellular mitogenesis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blau H. M., Chiu C. P., Webster C. Cytoplasmic activation of human nuclear genes in stable heterocaryons. Cell. 1983 Apr;32(4):1171–1180. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90300-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blau H. M., Pavlath G. K., Hardeman E. C., Chiu C. P., Silberstein L., Webster S. G., Miller S. C., Webster C. Plasticity of the differentiated state. Science. 1985 Nov 15;230(4727):758–766. doi: 10.1126/science.2414846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clegg C. H., Linkhart T. A., Olwin B. B., Hauschka S. D. Growth factor control of skeletal muscle differentiation: commitment to terminal differentiation occurs in G1 phase and is repressed by fibroblast growth factor. J Cell Biol. 1987 Aug;105(2):949–956. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.2.949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis F. M., Adelberg E. A. Use of somatic cell hybrids for analysis of the differentiated state. Bacteriol Rev. 1973 Jun;37(2):197–214. doi: 10.1128/br.37.2.197-214.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fogel M., Defendi V. Infection of muscle cultures from various species with oncogenic DNA viruses (SV40 and polyoma). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Sep;58(3):967–973. doi: 10.1073/pnas.58.3.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Groudine M., Casimir C. Post-transcriptional regulation of the chicken thymidine kinase gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Feb 10;12(3):1427–1446. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.3.1427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jimenez de Asua L., Richmond K. M., Otto A. M. Two growth factors and two hormones regulate initiation of DNA synthesis in cultured mouse cells through different pathways of events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Feb;78(2):1004–1008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. KIT S., DUBBS D. R., PIEKARSKI L. J., HSU T. C. DELETION OF THYMIDINE KINASE ACTIVITY FROM L CELLS RESISTANT TO BROMODEOXYURIDINE. Exp Cell Res. 1963 Aug;31:297–312. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(63)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaighn M. E., Ebert J. D., Stott P. M. The susceptibility of differentiating muscle clones to Rous sarcoma virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Jul;56(1):133–140. doi: 10.1073/pnas.56.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelly K., Cochran B. H., Stiles C. D., Leder P. Cell-specific regulation of the c-myc gene by lymphocyte mitogens and platelet-derived growth factor. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(3 Pt 2):603–610. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90092-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Konieczny S. F., Lawrence J. B., Coleman J. R. Analysis of muscle protein expression in polyethylene glycol-induced chicken: rat myoblast heterokaryons. J Cell Biol. 1983 Nov;97(5 Pt 1):1348–1355. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.5.1348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lawrence J. B., Coleman J. R. Extinction of muscle-specific properties in somatic cell heterokaryons. Dev Biol. 1984 Feb;101(2):463–476. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90160-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lim R. W., Hauschka S. D. A rapid decrease in epidermal growth factor-binding capacity accompanies the terminal differentiation of mouse myoblasts in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1984 Feb;98(2):739–747. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.2.739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lim R. W., Hauschka S. D. EGF responsiveness and receptor regulation in normal and differentiation-defective mouse myoblasts. Dev Biol. 1984 Sep;105(1):48–58. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90260-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Linkhart T. A., Clegg C. H., Hauschika S. D. Myogenic differentiation in permanent clonal mouse myoblast cell lines: regulation by macromolecular growth factors in the culture medium. Dev Biol. 1981 Aug;86(1):19–30. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90311-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Linkhart T. A., Clegg C. H., Hauschka S. D. Control of mouse myoblast commitment to terminal differentiation by mitogens. J Supramol Struct. 1980;14(4):483–498. doi: 10.1002/jss.400140407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Merrill G. F., Hauschka S. D., McKnight S. L. tk Enzyme expression in differentiating muscle cells is regulated through an internal segment of the cellular tk gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Sep;4(9):1777–1784. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.9.1777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schwab I. A., Luger O. Reinitiation of DNA synthesis in postmitotic nuclei of myotubes by virus-mediated fusion with embryonic fibroblasts. Differentiation. 1980 Apr;16(2):93–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1980.tb01063.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wright W. E. Control of differentiation in heterokaryons and hybrids involving differentiation-defective myoblast variants. J Cell Biol. 1984 Feb;98(2):436–443. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.2.436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wright W. E. Induction of muscle genes in neural cells. J Cell Biol. 1984 Feb;98(2):427–435. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.2.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wright W. E. Synthesis of rat myosin light chains in heterokaryons formed between undifferentiated rat myoblasts and chick skeletal myocytes. J Cell Biol. 1981 Oct;91(1):11–16. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES