Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1987 Sep 1;105(3):1435–1442. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.3.1435

Selective interaction of peripheral and central nervous system cells with two distinct cell-binding domains of fibronectin

PMCID: PMC2114815  PMID: 2958484

Abstract

Mechanisms of cell interaction with fibronectin have been studied with proteolytic fibronectin fragments that have well-defined ligand binding properties. Results of a previous study (Rogers, S. L., J. B. McCarthy, S. L. Palm, L. T. Furcht, and P. C. Letourneau, 1985, J. Neurosci., 5:369-378) demonstrated that (a) central (CNS) and peripheral (PNS) nervous system neurons adhere to, and extend neurites on a 33-kD carboxyl terminal fibronectin fragment that also binds heparin, and (b) neurons from the PNS, but not the CNS, have stable interactions with a 75-kD cell-binding fragment and with intact fibronectin. In the present study domain-specific reagents were used in inhibition assays to further differentiate cell surface interactions with the two fibronectin domains, and to define the significance of these domains to cell interactions with the intact fibronectin molecule. These reagents are (a) a soluble synthetic tetrapeptide Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser (RGDS; Pierschbacher, M. D., and E. Ruoslahti, 1984, Nature (Lond.), 309:30- 33) representing a cell-binding determinant in the 75-kD fragment, and (b) an antibody raised against the 33-kD fragment that binds specifically to that fragment. Initial cell attachment to, and neurite extension upon, fibronectin and the two different fragments was evaluated in the presence and absence of the two reagents. Attachment of both PNS and CNS cells to intact fibronectin was reduced in the presence of RGDS, the former more so than the latter. In contrast, the antibody to the 33-kD fragment did not affect attachment of PNS cells to fibronectin, but significantly decreased attachment of CNS cells to the molecule. RGDS inhibited attachment of CNS cells to the molecule. RGDS inhibited attachment of both cell types to the 75-kD fragment to a greater degree than it did attachment to the intact molecule. Cell interaction with the 33-kD fragment was not affected by RGDS. Reduction of neurite lengths (determined after 24 h of culture) by the domain- specific reagents paralleled the reduction in initial adhesion to each substratum. Therefore, it appears that (a) both PNS and CNS cells have receptors for each cell-binding domain of fibronectin, (b) the receptor(s) for the two domains are distinct, with attachment to the 33- kD fragment being independent of RGDS, and (c) the relative importance of each domain to cell interaction with intact fibronectin is different for CNS and PNS cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akeson R., Warren S. L. PC12 adhesion and neurite formation on selected substrates are inhibited by some glycosaminoglycans and a fibronectin-derived tetrapeptide. Exp Cell Res. 1986 Feb;162(2):347–362. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(86)90340-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akiyama S. K., Hasegawa E., Hasegawa T., Yamada K. M. The interaction of fibronectin fragments with fibroblastic cells. J Biol Chem. 1985 Oct 25;260(24):13256–13260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Akiyama S. K., Yamada S. S., Yamada K. M. Characterization of a 140-kD avian cell surface antigen as a fibronectin-binding molecule. J Cell Biol. 1986 Feb;102(2):442–448. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.2.442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bozyczko D., Horwitz A. F. The participation of a putative cell surface receptor for laminin and fibronectin in peripheral neurite extension. J Neurosci. 1986 May;6(5):1241–1251. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-05-01241.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bronner-Fraser M. Alterations in neural crest migration by a monoclonal antibody that affects cell adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1985 Aug;101(2):610–617. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.2.610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown P. J., Juliano R. L. Selective inhibition of fibronectin-mediated cell adhesion by monoclonal antibodies to a cell-surface glycoprotein. Science. 1985 Jun 21;228(4706):1448–1451. doi: 10.1126/science.4012302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cole G. J., Schubert D., Glaser L. Cell-substratum adhesion in chick neural retina depends upon protein-heparan sulfate interactions. J Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;100(4):1192–1199. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.4.1192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Decker C., Greggs R., Duggan K., Stubbs J., Horwitz A. Adhesive multiplicity in the interaction of embryonic fibroblasts and myoblasts with extracellular matrices. J Cell Biol. 1984 Oct;99(4 Pt 1):1398–1404. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.4.1398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eisenbarth G. S., Walsh F. S., Nirenberg M. Monoclonal antibody to a plasma membrane antigen of neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):4913–4917. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.4913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grinnell F., Feld M. K. Adsorption characteristics of plasma fibronectin in relationship to biological activity. J Biomed Mater Res. 1981 May;15(3):363–381. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820150308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hasegawa T., Hasegawa E., Chen W. T., Yamada K. M. Characterization of a membrane-associated glycoprotein complex implicated in cell adhesion to fibronectin. J Cell Biochem. 1985;28(4):307–318. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240280409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hayashi M., Yamada K. M. Domain structure of the carboxyl-terminal half of human plasma fibronectin. J Biol Chem. 1983 Mar 10;258(5):3332–3340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Horwitz A., Duggan K., Greggs R., Decker C., Buck C. The cell substrate attachment (CSAT) antigen has properties of a receptor for laminin and fibronectin. J Cell Biol. 1985 Dec;101(6):2134–2144. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.6.2134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Humphries M. J., Akiyama S. K., Komoriya A., Olden K., Yamada K. M. Identification of an alternatively spliced site in human plasma fibronectin that mediates cell type-specific adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;103(6 Pt 2):2637–2647. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hynes R. O. Fibronectins. Sci Am. 1986 Jun;254(6):42–51. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0686-42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Izzard C. S., Radinsky R., Culp L. A. Substratum contacts and cytoskeletal reorganization of BALB/c 3T3 cells on a cell-binding fragment and heparin-binding fragments of plasma fibronectin. Exp Cell Res. 1986 Aug;165(2):320–336. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(86)90586-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Knudsen K. A., Horwitz A. F., Buck C. A. A monoclonal antibody identifies a glycoprotein complex involved in cell-substratum adhesion. Exp Cell Res. 1985 Mar;157(1):218–226. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(85)90164-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Laterra J., Silbert J. E., Culp L. A. Cell surface heparan sulfate mediates some adhesive responses to glycosaminoglycan-binding matrices, including fibronectin. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jan;96(1):112–123. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.1.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Letourneau P. C. Cell-to-substratum adhesion and guidance of axonal elongation. Dev Biol. 1975 May;44(1):92–101. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(75)90379-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Loring J., Glimelius B., Weston J. A. Extracellular matrix materials influence quail neural crest cell differentiation in vitro. Dev Biol. 1982 Mar;90(1):165–174. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90222-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Matthew W. D., Greenspan R. J., Lander A. D., Reichardt L. F. Immunopurification and characterization of a neuronal heparan sulfate proteoglycan. J Neurosci. 1985 Jul;5(7):1842–1850. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-07-01842.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McCarthy J. B., Hagen S. T., Furcht L. T. Human fibronectin contains distinct adhesion- and motility-promoting domains for metastatic melanoma cells. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jan;102(1):179–188. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.1.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Palm S. L., Furcht L. T. Production of laminin and fibronectin by Schwannoma cells: cell-protein interactions in vitro and protein localization in peripheral nerve in vivo. J Cell Biol. 1983 May;96(5):1218–1226. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.5.1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Perkins M. E., Ji T. H., Hynes R. O. Cross-linking of fibronectin to sulfated proteoglycans at the cell surface. Cell. 1979 Apr;16(4):941–952. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90109-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pierschbacher M. D., Hayman E. G., Ruoslahti E. Location of the cell-attachment site in fibronectin with monoclonal antibodies and proteolytic fragments of the molecule. Cell. 1981 Oct;26(2 Pt 2):259–267. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90308-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pierschbacher M. D., Ruoslahti E. Cell attachment activity of fibronectin can be duplicated by small synthetic fragments of the molecule. Nature. 1984 May 3;309(5963):30–33. doi: 10.1038/309030a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pierschbacher M. D., Ruoslahti E. Variants of the cell recognition site of fibronectin that retain attachment-promoting activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Oct;81(19):5985–5988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.19.5985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pytela R., Pierschbacher M. D., Ruoslahti E. Identification and isolation of a 140 kd cell surface glycoprotein with properties expected of a fibronectin receptor. Cell. 1985 Jan;40(1):191–198. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90322-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ratner N., Bunge R. P., Glaser L. A neuronal cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan is required for dorsal root ganglion neuron stimulation of Schwann cell proliferation. J Cell Biol. 1985 Sep;101(3):744–754. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.3.744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rogers S. L., Letourneau P. C., Palm S. L., McCarthy J., Furcht L. T. Neurite extension by peripheral and central nervous system neurons in response to substratum-bound fibronectin and laminin. Dev Biol. 1983 Jul;98(1):212–220. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90350-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rogers S. L., McCarthy J. B., Palm S. L., Furcht L. T., Letourneau P. C. Neuron-specific interactions with two neurite-promoting fragments of fibronectin. J Neurosci. 1985 Feb;5(2):369–378. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-02-00369.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rovasio R. A., Delouvee A., Yamada K. M., Timpl R., Thiery J. P. Neural crest cell migration: requirements for exogenous fibronectin and high cell density. J Cell Biol. 1983 Feb;96(2):462–473. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.2.462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ruoslahti E., Hayman E. G., Pierschbacher M. D. Extracellular matrices and cell adhesion. Arteriosclerosis. 1985 Nov-Dec;5(6):581–594. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.5.6.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schubert D., LaCorbiere M. Isolation of a cell-surface receptor for chick neural retina adherons. J Cell Biol. 1985 Jan;100(1):56–63. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.1.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Smith D. E., Mosher D. F., Johnson R. B., Furcht L. T. Immunological identification of two sulfhydryl-containing fragments of human plasma fibronectin. J Biol Chem. 1982 May 25;257(10):5831–5838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tobey S. L., McClelland K. J., Culp L. A. Neurite extension by neuroblastoma cells on substratum-bound fibronectin's cell-binding fragment but not on the heparan sulfate-binding protein, platelet factor-4. Exp Cell Res. 1985 Jun;158(2):395–412. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(85)90464-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tooney N. M., Mosesson M. W., Amrani D. L., Hainfeld J. F., Wall J. S. Solution and surface effects on plasma fibronectin structure. J Cell Biol. 1983 Dec;97(6):1686–1692. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.6.1686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Urushihara H., Yamada K. M. Evidence for involvement of more than one class of glycoprotein in cell interactions with fibronectin. J Cell Physiol. 1986 Mar;126(3):323–332. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041260302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Woods A., Couchman J. R., Johansson S., Hök M. Adhesion and cytoskeletal organisation of fibroblasts in response to fibronectin fragments. EMBO J. 1986 Apr;5(4):665–670. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04265.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Woods A., Hök M., Kjellén L., Smith C. G., Rees D. A. Relationship of heparan sulfate proteoglycans to the cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix of cultured fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1984 Nov;99(5):1743–1753. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.5.1743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yamada K. M. Cell surface interactions with extracellular materials. Annu Rev Biochem. 1983;52:761–799. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.003553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yamada K. M., Critchley D. R., Fishman P. H., Moss J. Exogenous gangliosides enhance the interaction of fibronectin with ganglioside-deficient cells. Exp Cell Res. 1983 Feb;143(2):295–302. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(83)90054-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yamada K. M., Kennedy D. W. Dualistic nature of adhesive protein function: fibronectin and its biologically active peptide fragments can autoinhibit fibronectin function. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 1):29–36. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES