Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1987 Nov 1;105(5):2191–2201. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2191

Microtubule assembly in cytoplasmic extracts of Xenopus oocytes and eggs

PMCID: PMC2114874  PMID: 3680377

Abstract

We have investigated the differences in microtubule assembly in cytoplasm from Xenopus oocytes and eggs in vitro. Extracts of activated eggs could be prepared that assembled extensive microtubule networks in vitro using Tetrahymena axonemes or mammalian centrosomes as nucleation centers. Assembly occurred predominantly from the plus-end of the microtubule with a rate constant of 2 microns.min-1.microM-1 (57 s- 1.microM-1). At the in vivo tubulin concentration, this corresponds to the extraordinarily high rate of 40-50 microns.min-1. Microtubule disassembly rates in these extracts were -4.5 microns.min-1 (128 s-1) at the plus-end and -6.9 microns.min-1 (196 s-1) at the minus-end. The critical concentration for plus-end microtubule assembly was 0.4 microM. These extracts also promoted the plus-end assembly of microtubules from bovine brain tubulin, suggesting the presence of an assembly promoting factor in the egg. In contrast to activated eggs, assembly was never observed in extracts prepared from oocytes, even at tubulin concentrations as high as 20 microM. Addition of oocyte extract to egg extracts or to purified brain tubulin inhibited microtubule assembly. These results suggest that there is a plus-end-specific inhibitor of microtubule assembly in the oocyte and a plus-end-specific promoter of assembly in the eggs. These factors may serve to regulate microtubule assembly during early development in Xenopus.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen C., Borisy G. G. Structural polarity and directional growth of microtubules of Chlamydomonas flagella. J Mol Biol. 1974 Dec 5;90(2):381–402. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90381-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryan J. B., Nagle B. W., Doenges K. H. Inhibition of tubulin assembly by RNA and other polyanions: evidence for a required protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Sep;72(9):3570–3574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Detrich H. W., 3rd, Wilson L. Purification, characterization, and assembly properties of tubulin from unfertilized eggs of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Biochemistry. 1983 May 10;22(10):2453–2462. doi: 10.1021/bi00279a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elinson R. P. Changes in levels of polymeric tubulin associated with activation and dorsoventral polarization of the frog egg. Dev Biol. 1985 May;109(1):224–233. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90362-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans L., Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Influence of the centrosome on the structure of nucleated microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;100(4):1185–1191. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.4.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gard D. L., Kirschner M. W. A microtubule-associated protein from Xenopus eggs that specifically promotes assembly at the plus-end. J Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;105(5):2203–2215. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gerhart J., Wu M., Kirschner M. Cell cycle dynamics of an M-phase-specific cytoplasmic factor in Xenopus laevis oocytes and eggs. J Cell Biol. 1984 Apr;98(4):1247–1255. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.4.1247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heidemann S. R., Gallas P. T. The effect of taxol on living eggs of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1980 Dec;80(2):489–494. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90421-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heidemann S. R., Hamborg M. A., Balasz J. E., Lindley S. Microtubules in immature oocytes of Xenopus laevis. J Cell Sci. 1985 Aug;77:129–141. doi: 10.1242/jcs.77.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heidemann S. R., Kirschner M. W. Aster formation in eggs of Xenopus laevis. Induction by isolated basal bodies. J Cell Biol. 1975 Oct;67(1):105–117. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Karsenti E., Newport J., Hubble R., Kirschner M. Interconversion of metaphase and interphase microtubule arrays, as studied by the injection of centrosomes and nuclei into Xenopus eggs. J Cell Biol. 1984 May;98(5):1730–1745. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.5.1730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Keller T. C., 3rd, Rebhun L. I. Strongylocentrotus purpuratus spindle tubulin. I. Characteristics of its polymerization and depolymerization in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;93(3):788–796. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.3.788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Manes M. E., Barbieri F. D. On the possibility of sperm aster involvement in dorso-ventral polarization and pronuclear migration in the amphibian egg. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1977 Aug;40:187–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):237–242. doi: 10.1038/312237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Microtubule assembly nucleated by isolated centrosomes. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):232–237. doi: 10.1038/312232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Newport J., Kirschner M. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell. 1982 Oct;30(3):675–686. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90272-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Olmsted J. B. Microtubule-associated proteins. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1986;2:421–457. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.02.110186.002225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schulze E., Kirschner M. Microtubule dynamics in interphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):1020–1031. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Suprenant K. A., Rebhun L. I. Cytoplasmic tubulin from the unfertilized sea urchin egg: II. Variation of the intrinsic calcium sensitivity of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus egg tubulin as a function of temperature and brain microtubule-associated proteins. Cell Motil. 1984;4(5):333–350. doi: 10.1002/cm.970040504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Suprenant K. A., Rebhun L. I. Purification and characterization of oocyte cytoplasmic tubulin and meiotic spindle tubulin of the surf clam Spisula solidissima. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jan;98(1):253–266. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.1.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tilney L. G., Bonder E. M., Coluccio L. M., Mooseker M. S. Actin from Thyone sperm assembles on only one end of an actin filament: a behavior regulated by profilin. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jul;97(1):112–124. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.1.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weisenberg R. C., Rosenfeld A. C. In vitro polymerization of microtubules into asters and spindles in homogenates of surf clam eggs. J Cell Biol. 1975 Jan;64(1):146–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.64.1.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES