Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1988 Feb 1;106(2):385–393. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.2.385

Motility-dependence of the heterogenous staining of culture cells by a monoclonal anti-tropomyosin antibody

PMCID: PMC2114971  PMID: 2448313

Abstract

A monoclonal antibody (CG1) which recognizes tropomyosin isoforms 1 and 3 of chicken embryo fibroblasts was used to detect what is a motility- dependent change in the availability of the antigenic determinant in tropomyosin molecules along microfilaments. Immunofluorescence microscopy with this antibody revealed a heterogenous staining pattern among chicken embryo fibroblasts cells such that a population (17%) of cells showed only background staining. Stress fibers in about half the population of the cells stained weakly with this antibody, while the stress fibers in another population of cells (35%) showed very strong staining. After glycerination or cytochalasin B treatment, all of the cells became positive in reaction to CG1 antibody, suggesting that the antigenic determinant was present in every cell. On the other hand, all of the cells after brief nonionic detergent treatment became negative to CG1 antibody. The CG1 staining pattern was not significantly changed in cells at different stages after release from colcemid blockage, nor was a brief treatment of cells with buffer containing 2 M urea, mild trypsin, chymotrypsin, or V.8 protease effective in changing the reactivity. However, most of the cells with a morphology typical of movement, and all of the contracted, glycerinated cells were strongly positive to CG1 antibody. These results suggest that the unmasking of the CG1 determinant may be motility-dependent. Immunoblot analysis showed that forced modification on the cysteine residue of tropomyosin molecules, caused either by performic acid oxidation or by disulfide cross-linking with the chemical 5,5'-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoate), results in drastic changes in the reactivity of the different isoforms to CG1 antibody. These results indicate that the cysteine residue is involved in the CG1 determinant. The motility-dependent unmasking of this determinant may suggest an important role for nonmuscle tropomyosin in regulating cell motility.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. I. Movements of the leading edge. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Mar;59(3):393–398. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90646-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Betteridge D. R., Lehrer S. S. Two conformational states of didansylcystine-labeled rabbit cardiac tropomyosin. J Mol Biol. 1983 Jun 25;167(2):481–496. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80346-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blose S. H. Ten-nanometer filaments and mitosis: maintenance of structural continuity in dividing endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jul;76(7):3372–3376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bretscher A. Thin filament regulatory proteins of smooth- and non-muscle cells. Nature. 1986 Jun 19;321(6072):726–727. doi: 10.1038/321726b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Côté G. P., Smillie L. B. The interaction of equine platelet tropomyosin with skeletal muscle actin. J Biol Chem. 1981 Jul 25;256(14):7257–7261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Côté G. P. Structural and functional properties of the non-muscle tropomyosins. Mol Cell Biochem. 1983;57(2):127–146. doi: 10.1007/BF00849190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ebashi S., Endo M., Otsuki I. Control of muscle contraction. Q Rev Biophys. 1969 Nov;2(4):351–384. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500001190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Franke W. W., Schmid E., Wellsteed J., Grund C., Gigi O., Geiger B. Change of cytokeratin filament organization during the cell cycle: selective masking of an immunologic determinant in interphase PtK2 cells. J Cell Biol. 1983 Oct;97(4):1255–1260. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.4.1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldman R. D. The effects of cytochalasin B on the microfilaments of baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) cells. J Cell Biol. 1972 Feb;52(2):246–254. doi: 10.1083/jcb.52.2.246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HOFFMANN-BERLING H. Adenosintriphosphat als Betriebsstoff von Zellbewegungen. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1954 Jun;14(2):182–194. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(54)90157-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hendricks M., Weintraub H. Tropomyosin is decreased in transformed cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Sep;78(9):5633–5637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.9.5633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Herman I. M., Crisona N. J., Pollard T. D. Relation between cell activity and the distribution of cytoplasmic actin and myosin. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jul;90(1):84–91. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.1.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kreis T. E., Birchmeier W. Stress fiber sarcomeres of fibroblasts are contractile. Cell. 1980 Nov;22(2 Pt 2):555–561. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90365-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Leavitt J., Latter G., Lutomski L., Goldstein D., Burbeck S. Tropomyosin isoform switching in tumorigenic human fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Jul;6(7):2721–2726. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.7.2721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lehman W., Szent-Györgyi A. G. Regulation of muscular contraction. Distribution of actin control and myosin control in the animal kingdom. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Jul;66(1):1–30. doi: 10.1085/jgp.66.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lehrer S. S., Graceffa P., Betteridge D. Conformational dynamics of tropomyosin in solution: evidence for two conformational states. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1981;366:285–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb20762.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lehrer S. S. Intramolecular crosslinking of tropomyosin via disulfide bond formation: evidence for chain register. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Sep;72(9):3377–3381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Leonardi C. L., Warren R. H., Rubin R. W. Lack of tropomyosin correlates with the absence of stress fibers in transformed rat kidney cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982 Apr 29;720(2):154–162. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(82)90007-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lin J. J., Chou C. S., Lin J. L. Monoclonal antibodies against chicken tropomyosin isoforms: production, characterization, and application. Hybridoma. 1985 Fall;4(3):223–242. doi: 10.1089/hyb.1985.4.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lin J. J., Helfman D. M., Hughes S. H., Chou C. S. Tropomyosin isoforms in chicken embryo fibroblasts: purification, characterization, and changes in Rous sarcoma virus-transformed cells. J Cell Biol. 1985 Mar;100(3):692–703. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.3.692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin J. J. Monoclonal antibodies against myofibrillar components of rat skeletal muscle decorate the intermediate filaments of cultured cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Apr;78(4):2335–2339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.4.2335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mannherz H. G., Goody R. S. Proteins of contractile systems. Annu Rev Biochem. 1976;45:427–465. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.45.070176.002235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Marston S. B., Smith C. W. The thin filaments of smooth muscles. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1985 Dec;6(6):669–708. doi: 10.1007/BF00712237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Matsumura F., Lin J. J., Yamashiro-Matsumura S., Thomas G. P., Topp W. C. Differential expression of tropomyosin forms in the microfilaments isolated from normal and transformed rat cultured cells. J Biol Chem. 1983 Nov 25;258(22):13954–13964. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Matsumura F., Yamashiro-Matsumura S., Lin J. J. Isolation and characterization of tropomyosin-containing microfilaments from cultured cells. J Biol Chem. 1983 May 25;258(10):6636–6644. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Matsumura F., Yamashiro-Matsumura S. Purification and characterization of multiple isoforms of tropomyosin from rat cultured cells. J Biol Chem. 1985 Nov 5;260(25):13851–13859. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sobue K., Muramoto Y., Fujita M., Kakiuchi S. Purification of a calmodulin-binding protein from chicken gizzard that interacts with F-actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Sep;78(9):5652–5655. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.9.5652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4350–4354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES